Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies beyond Bitcoin are already a more complicated story. The endless argument over what should be called a shitcoin and what should count as a “normal” cryptocurrency will probably continue for a long time. For many years, my own dividing line looked like this: 1. Bitcoin 2. Ethereum ------ shitcoins ------ 3. Other cryptocurrencies Ethereum is, without question, a revolution. Smar…

Channel
PAVELUDO Expert Advisors
@new_signals
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,383subscribers
-100 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001407441138 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @new_signals |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/new_signals |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 4,383 | -14 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 4,397 | -12 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 22:56 | 4,409 | -9 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 4,418 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 4,429 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 4,431 | -7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 4,438 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 4,449 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 4,455 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 4,461 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 4,466 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 4,472 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4,479 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 4,482 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 4,481 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 4,483 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 4,483 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 23 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Bitcoin Is Entering a Zone of Long-Term Interest Bitcoin is approaching a phase that, in my view, looks interesting for long-term buying. Bitcoin’s multi-year cycles have been fairly similar to each other. For that reason, it makes sense to assume that the current cycle, and the next ones as well, will be broadly similar. Since 2014, Bitcoin has each time gone through a drawdown from its ATH of roughly 80%, 80%, a…
As for the Gold Reaper signal itself and The Gold Reaper MT5 trading robot behind it, I will come back to that separately. The signal itself looks interesting across a broad set of metrics, but it makes more sense to break it down in the next step, using a more proper analytical toolkit. And by the way, if anyone knows a service where you can get analytics on public trading accounts at this level of detail, send me …
How I set out to analyze Gold Reaper and ended up building my own alpha-version trading-account analyzer As I already mentioned, new developers have been added to EasyAlgos, which means new trading systems have appeared there as well. From the point of view of diversifying a portfolio of trading systems, I was quite interested in seeing what was actually available there. For the first analysis, I chose one of the c…
Html file with Golden Reaper signal analysis. Yes, the file is large, but it contains a huge amount of minute-level data, and this is only an alpha version.
Photo, posted without a caption
Why I Don’t Want to Mix Analysis and Decisions I already had the experience of running a blog about investing and trading. I ran a similar blog in Russian for just under ten years. It was a very valuable experience. It forced me to go deep into a wide range of investment-related topics and to understand them in real detail. Now I see that the main mistake of that project was its format. I was doing not only analys…
I have long divided a trader’s strengths into two separate dimensions. The first is market understanding: the ability to genuinely see what is happening. What market regime we are in, where the structure is, where the noise is, where the risk is, and where the usual logic is already starting to break down. The second is the ability to make decisions that actually lead to profit. And the problem is that many people…
For a long time, I had been thinking about creating a separate Telegram channel alongside PAVELUDO Expert Advisors. That channel has always been very clearly tied to my own products: trading robots and signals. And every time I had the idea of publishing some analytical material that had nothing to do with my products directly, it felt like an unnecessary mix of topics. But the reality is that my finished products, …
I’ve returned all the robots to normal operating mode.
Hi everyone. The world is going crazy again. While Israel and the US are “hammering” Iran, the oil market — and, following it, other markets as well — remains under tension. Most of the volatility is already priced in, but for extra safety I will not be running my robots on my own accounts during this week. On the other hand, since most of the risks are already reflected in current prices, you may still run my EAs …
⚠️ Another war in the Middle East is creating too much uncertainty in the financial markets. In these conditions, I recommend turning off all of my trading robots 🛑🤖 — they are not designed to operate during periods of heightened political and financial uncertainty 🌍📉.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @new_signals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PAVELUDO Expert Advisors” (@new_signals), 4,383 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/new_signals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.