Photo, posted without a caption
👍5

Channel
@new_car_smell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,569subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001483330135 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @new_car_smell |
| Created | 12 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/new_car_smell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 7,569 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:13 | 7,572 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 7,575 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 7,577 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 7,581 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 7,582 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 7,594 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 7,595 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 7,608 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 7,601 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 7,603 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 7,603 | first reading |
65 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 47,214 |
| Reactions total | 2,231 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,993 reactions across 65 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 605 | 20.2% | |
| 👍 | 524 | 17.5% | |
| ❤ | 498 | 16.6% | |
| custom 5456342988462515144 | 449 | 15.0% | |
| 😁 | 262 | 8.75% | |
| 🤣 | 185 | 6.18% | |
| 🤔 | 58 | 1.94% | |
| 👀 | 51 | 1.70% | |
| 🎉 | 45 | 1.50% | |
| ❤🔥 | 43 | 1.44% | |
| 👌 | 38 | 1.27% | |
| 🍾 | 32 | 1.07% | |
| 🤪 | 27 | 0.902% | |
| ⚡ | 23 | 0.768% | |
| 🫡 | 23 | 0.768% | |
| 💊 | 21 | 0.702% | |
| 🤨 | 21 | 0.702% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 0.535% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 0.468% | |
| 😐 | 13 | 0.434% | |
| 8 further kinds | 45 | 1.50% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,993 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5
Снова легонькая #легкая_угадайка. Пятница же – чего напрягать и напрягаться? Всего-то и нужно, что назвать марку этого транспортного средства. Три, два, раз – ответ готов 🙂 #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😁8🔥7custom 54563429884625151447❤1
Если вы до сих пор думаете, что во главе крупных «западных концернов» стоят умные – да хоть просто разумные – люди, то вот вам цитата одного из них. «Когда я впервые сел за руль электрического CLA 45 с системой звуковой имитации выпуска, я почувствовал себя заново рожденным христианином, – сказал глава Mercedes-Benz Ола Каллениус. – Знаете, это как мотор V8 только лучше – больше мощности и тяги. И звук тоже есть». 😕…
🤣51💊13custom 54563429884625151445❤2😐2😁1
☹️ Китайские тоже плачут Мы как-то приняли за данность, что автопром Китая почти как танки Гудериана – сметают все на своем пути. Видят цель, не замечают преград. В реальности там идет бойня, из которой живыми выходят не все. Пример – Avatr. На бумаге все всегда было идеально. Changan дает деньги и производственные мощности, CATL – батареи, Huawei – электронику и автопилот. Главный дизайнер – Надер Фагихзаде, экс-B…
😁28custom 54563429884625151449🤔6🔥5🙏3❤1👀1
От мечт к реальности. Напомните, плиз, как выглядело ценообразование на классические Lada на итальянском рынке в 1970-80-х? #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥8⚡3👌2custom 54563429884625151442
Photo, posted without a caption
❤17🤩6👍5👏1😍1
Серьезный вопрос. А есть ли автомобиль, которым вы восхищаетесь и любите, но при этом никогда бы не купили, будь даже такая возможность? Для меня это Citroen SM. Всегда он. Фьюжн божественной эстетики, сумасшедших характеристик, идиосинкратического набора комплектующих (французская гидравлика, итальянский мотор), помноженный на качество сборки, характерное для компании на грани банкротства. Только если купить, пос…
❤31👍14custom 54563429884625151447😁3🤣1
Сегодня 88 лет Марчелло Гандини. Нелюдимый, тихий гений. Порой и необъяснимый. Countach обожал, к «Миуре» относился прохладно. А на чем мэтр в нулевых гонял в «Пятерочку» из своего дома в предгорьях Альп в получасе от Турина? #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤23🤣15🤔7🔥6😎4custom 54563429884625151441
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10👏4👌2
Кстати, про Тони Крука из Bristol на канале уже было. Вот же оторва был мужик. 🙂 #олдскул Подпишись на Запах Новой Машины
👍22❤7custom 54563429884625151445
✈️ Bristol Blenheim — это самолет или автомобиль? Да. На секундочку, Bristol Aeroplane — одна из старейших авиационных компаний Великобритании. Основана в 1910-м, самолеты выпускала еще до Первой мировой. А после Второй занялась и автомобилями. Очень удачно подвернулись репарации. Из Мюнхена вывезли права на три модели BMW, документацию на мотор 328 и заодно конструктора Фрица Фидлера. Первые «Бристоли» не только …
🔥50custom 545634298846251514412❤11🤔3⚡2👍1
Под хороший снимок и #угадайка_без_вариантов заходит отлично. Никаких изменений в правилах: четыре подсказки на словах, одна на фото. Чур не гуглить — это тоже как всегда. Если уж загуглили, держите правильный ответ при себе, пусть другие помучаются. 😉 Сегодня достаточно назвать только марку. Ну и самое главное — добавляйте цепочку логических рассуждений в ответ. Так ведь интересней. Итак, погнали. 1️⃣ Эта автом…
🤔14custom 545634298846251514412❤7😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @new_car_smell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Снова легонькая #легкая_угадайка. Пятница же – чего напрягать и напрягаться? Всего-то и нужно, что назвать марку этого транспортного средства. Три, два, раз – ответ готов 🙂 #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
От мечт к реальности. Напомните, плиз, как выглядело ценообразование на классические Lada на итальянском рынке в 1970-80-х? #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сегодня 88 лет Марчелло Гандини. Нелюдимый, тихий гений. Порой и необъяснимый. Countach обожал, к «Миуре» относился прохладно. А на чем мэтр в нулевых гонял в «Пятерочку» из своего дома в предгорьях Альп в получасе от Турина? #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Марка и модель здесь несущественны. Вопрос в другом: для чего предназначен это дефлектор? 😉 #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Автомобили этой марки часто бывают вариантами угадайки, и на них очень часто покупаются. 😉 Папамобиль какого бренда перед вами? #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Угадайка с подковыркой. Скажите вот, пожалуйста, из какого дерева была сделана приборная панель – вернее вся передняя панель от двери до двери – на люксовых автомобилях Facel Vega Excellence? #легкая_угадайка
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Запах новой машины” (@new_car_smell), 7,569 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/new_car_smell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.