Лучший канал в интернете по мнению Невзорова @nevzorovtv
@nevzorovfanclub
Для донатов https://t.me/nevzorovtv_donate
https://instagram.com/lydianevzorova
https://www.youtube.com/@NevzorovTV
Created
14 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,386–53,591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 19:56
53,418
-30
16 Aug 2026, 16:09
53,448
-18
14 Aug 2026, 22:45
53,466
-18
13 Aug 2026, 16:28
53,484
-8
12 Aug 2026, 16:43
53,492
-17
11 Aug 2026, 18:47
53,509
-21
10 Aug 2026, 19:14
53,530
-19
9 Aug 2026, 22:24
53,549
-18
8 Aug 2026, 21:23
53,567
+157
7 Aug 2026, 19:11
53,410
-27
6 Aug 2026, 22:00
53,437
-14
6 Aug 2026, 01:45
53,451
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:48
53,451
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 8 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
557.3%
avg views ÷ 53,418 subscribers
Avg views / post
298,000
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
11 (8 February 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
893,100
Reactions total
21,394
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
926
Videos
799
Links
248
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8m 17s
Average length
1m 39s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42,536 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤮
14,573
34.3%
🔥
11,879
27.9%
❤
10,782
25.3%
🤯
1,691
3.98%
🤣
1,481
3.48%
🙏
1,042
2.45%
🤬
401
0.943%
😁
259
0.609%
😢
217
0.51%
💔
115
0.27%
😱
96
0.226%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,536reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
179
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 11 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
127
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nevzorovalidia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 February 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Все пишут, что меня арестовали за
Финансирование экстремизма. То есть, за содержание себя и собственной семьи (единственной в мире признанной экстремистской организацией).
Все понимаю, иметь имущество, дом, деньги, счета и пенсии, получать донаты и зарабатывать - нельзя.
Очевидно, смысл в том, чтобы мы умерли от голода, а с нами и наш «экстремизм». Ок. Логично.
Но возникает серьезный юридический вопрос.))
Огран…
По нашим данным, WB хранил и доставлял на оккупированные территории Украины дроны и другие товары военного назначения. Не только через мелких бизнесменов, а прямо -заказы Минобороны орков. В этом и есть основная причина уничтожения складов.
Wildberries никогда не принадлежали Ким. Все кремлевское.
@nevzorovtv
@nevzorovalidia
Удивительно наблюдать как на пятом году «посыпались» и «поплыли» «хорошие русские». Столько лет они держались в рамках приличий, но WB вопрос все испортил.
Они напрочь потеряли причинно- следственную связь и начали сердечно сочувствовать «несчастным» русским торговцам.
Их обязывают к состраданию «высокие моральные качества» и «нормы гуманизма».
Я буквально в шоке читаю комментарии бывших соратников по борьбе.
Они нас…
Мы были первыми, у кого все отняли. Поэтому, «на правах бывалого», хочу приободрить тех, кому только предстоит это пережить.
Все фигня, товарищи. Свобода дороже!
Если у вас не хватило ума все продать и вы все еще цепляетесь за какую-нибудь квартирку, в надежде на то, что путин скоро сдохнет, значит вы не до конца понимаете, что происходит. Даже если упырь сдохнет, вам - легче не станет.
Поверьте, когда у вас все от…
Убийство было и будет любимым способом решения проблем властьимущих.
На видео- Генерал российской армии Джохар Дудаев рассказывает о сути и планах россии. Удивительно точную оценку дал в 1995.
Он не хотел быть с россией.
Он был за независимость Чечни. Собрал свою армию и вступил в неравный бой, ибо знал что российская армия не сильна. Но просчитался.
Был убит ракетой в горах. Говорят, его предал кто-то и з близк…
Потрясающие тетки в мужских ботинках прошлись строем на параде в Чите.
Это те самые особи, которые послали своих мужей и сыновей на убийства и убой ради денег.
Не верю в патриотизм россиян. Не верю, что хоть кого-нибудь в этой нищей, задолбанной стране волновали «нацисты» за тысячи километров.
Корысть и только корысть.
Может ли женщина отправившая, или не сумевшая удержать мужчину от совершения преступлений считат…
Война, смерти, трагедии так и не научили меня почему-то относиться равнодушно к издевательствам над детьми. Даже чужими и детьми врага.
На видео рассказ матери о «частной школе» с патриотически-скрепным воспитанием с примесью «казачества» и «кадетства». Все как любит их вождь- путин.
Очевидно, что многие педагоги склонны к насилию, вероятно половина учителей идет в учителя именно из-за потайных желаний поучать и…
Помню, как 4 года назад, я поставила видео о мамаше, которая благодарила за героическую смерть сына. И никто не верил, что такое может быть, и все переругались.
А теперь, все знают, что так и есть, все верят, но всем плевать.
@nevzorovtv
Зашла после долгого бана в Instagram, и тут же выяснила, что помимо серого бана и удаления ВСЕХ АНТИВОЕННЫХ ПОСТОВ, сейчас в наши дни они удаляют не только мои современные посты, но и посты многолетней давности якобы за нарушения правил.
Один из удаленных постов на скрине. 2021 год- довоенный. Что в нем «такого»? И кому не лень это все удалять? Кто это делает? И можно ли после такого называть сеть Instagram вр…
🤯1,040❤644🔥212😢67🤬52🤣31🤮21😱16
Signed Lidia N
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @nevzorovalidia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@nevzorovalidia edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 9,606 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Невзорова Лидия” (@nevzorovalidia), 53,418 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevzorovalidia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
