Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Невтяники🍺Мужская психология

Channel

Невтяники🍺Мужская психология

@nevtanut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,338subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002330400651
TypeChannel
Username@nevtanut
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nevtanut

Growth

3,3383,3603,3497 August 2026 — 3,360 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,360 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,353 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,338 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,335–3,363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:243,338-15
11 Aug 2026, 07:353,353-7
8 Aug 2026, 04:333,360no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:313,360first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 15s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

460 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍28361.5%
13328.9%
🔥398.48%
😁40.87%
💯10.217%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 460reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 May 2026, 07:00 UTC371 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zloy_humorVideo

Это твой 😂 Злой юмор. Теперь и в ➕MAX.

👍185💯1🔥1😁1

23 Apr 2026, 18:30 UTC511 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zloy_humorVideo

Проблемное Это твой 😂 Злой юмор. Теперь и в ➕MAX.

👍167🔥1

29 Mar 2026, 15:34 UTC674 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zloy_humorPhoto

Облизнулся Подпишись на 😂 Злой юмор.

👍138🔥4

20 Mar 2026, 06:35 UTC704 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

👉Мужская психология | Чат

👍1412🔥2😁1

16 Mar 2026, 18:00 UTC659 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Психология 👉Мужская психология | Чат

👍109🔥4

16 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTC481 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✍️ Как сказать нет человеку: 4 способа отказать красиво Выбирай любой способ красиво сказать «нет», чтобы парировать собеседника. Достаточно только этих слов для отказа, а другие просто не нужны: 📌 Спасибо, но меня это не интересует. 📌 У меня нет времени, чтобы посвятить этому свое внимание. 📌 Извините, но я пытаюсь в этом году не брать на себя лишние обязательства. 📌 Я уже сковал себя другими обещаниями и обяза

👍137🔥2

16 Mar 2026, 12:50 UTC379 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Психология 👉Мужская психология | Чат

👍15🔥51

16 Mar 2026, 09:05 UTC352 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Психология 👉Мужская психология | Чат

👍17🔥42

16 Mar 2026, 06:35 UTC686 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Психология 👉Мужская психология | Чат

👍184🔥2

15 Mar 2026, 18:00 UTC712 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Неудачники 👉Мужская психология | Чат

👍1210🔥2😁1

15 Mar 2026, 12:50 UTC692 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Разрядился 👉Мужская психология | Чат

👍147🔥1

15 Mar 2026, 06:35 UTC618 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Быть взрослым 👉Мужская психология | Чат

👍148😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nevtanut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,114,962 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Невтяники🍺Мужская психология” (@nevtanut), 3,338 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevtanut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.