Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nevrosphera | Неврология для специалистов | Новости, эфиры, клинические случаи

@nevrosphera

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,170subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002050507880
TypeChannel
Username@nevrosphera
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nevrosphera

Growth

1,1701,1731,171.57 August 2026 — 1,173 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,173 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,172 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,170 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,170–1,173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:491,170-2
11 Aug 2026, 10:081,172-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:331,173no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:201,173first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.12%
avg views ÷ 1,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
95.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 April 20265 August 2026)
Views total285
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3744.0%
👍2934.5%
🔥1517.9%
🎉11.19%
👏11.19%
🤔11.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По данным статистики, медикаментозное лечение прописывается большинству пациентов с тревожными состояниями. Систематический обзор, опубликованный коллективом из Дании, пролил свет на эффективность таких назначений. Исследователи проанализировали данные 34 рандомизированных испытаний по данным на сентябрь 2022 года, включив более 7 тыс. пациентов и сравнив 18 препаратов с плацебо и между собой во всевозможных комбина

1👍1🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC84 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В новом систематическом обзоре рандомизированных испытаний от Кокрейна были получены неоднозначные данные об эффективности антидепрессантов, которые широко применяются для лечения хронической неспецифической боли в нижней части спины и/или ассоциированной боли в нижних конечностях. У большинства участников боль длилась более трех месяцев (в среднем от 18 месяцев до 20 лет). Для неспецифических болей в пояснице инги

3👍3🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC159 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Являясь нейротропным вирусом, Varicella zoster (вирус герпеса человека 3-го типа, VZV) при первом контакте протекает в виде ветряной оспы, а затем долгие годы сохраняется в нервных ганглиях, чтобы при ослаблении иммунитета реактивироваться в форме опоясывающего лишая. Носительство вируса ветряной оспы давно ассоциируется со снижением когнитивных функций, а ранние исследования показывали, что вакцинация от VZV снижае

👍41🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC140 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Адаптивная глубокая стимуляция мозга — новый метод лечения болезни Паркинсона? Персонализированную адаптивную глубокую стимуляцию мозга (ГСМ) называют будущим нейростимуляции, предполагается, что этот метод поможет эффективнее контролировать проявление двигательных нарушений при болезни Паркинсона (БП). Во всяком случае, о таких результатах сообщают ученые из Центра двигательных расстройств и нейромодуляции Калифор

1👍1🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC130 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Впервые проведен сетевой метаанализ эффективности различных методов электромагнитной стимуляции для лечения бессонницы после инсульта. В анализ вошли 28 рандомизированных контролируемых исследований с участием 2353 пациентов. Показатели качества сна улучшились во всех группах, наиболее эффективной оказалась низкочастотная ритмическая транскраниальная магнитная стимуляция. Однако значительная доля исследований низког

2👍1🔥1

1 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC200 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новые исследования проливают свет на удивительную способность обонятельной тренировки не только восстанавливать утраченное обоняние, но и потенциально улучшать когнитивные функции, такие как память и вербальная беглость. Этот немедикаментозный подход, использующий нашу естественную реакцию на запахи, вызывает большой интерес, ведь потеря обоняния часто является одним из ранних признаков таких серьезных состояний, ка

3👍1🔥1

24 Jun 2026, 10:31 UTC167 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какой дополнительный клинический симптом наиболее вероятен у данного пациента?

  1. Атаксическая походка84%
  2. Вертикальный нистагм6%
  3. Точечные зрачки3%
  4. Повышенный аппетит7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jun 2026, 10:31 UTC166 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В приемное отделение сотрудники полиции привезли 40-летнего бездомного. Мужчина был обнаружен лежащим на земле в парке. При осмотре: пациент находится в состоянии дезориентации, речь невнятная. Зрачки обычного размера, реагируют на свет. На затылке — небольшая рваная рана без признаков перелома костей черепа. В экстренном порядке внутривенно введены глюкоза, тиамин и налоксон. После введения налоксона состояние п

2👍1🔥1

21 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC158 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 Сегодня праздник профессионалов, без которых невозможно представить наш мир. Спасибо всем, кто каждый день помогает, лечит, сопровождает, исследует, организует и поддерживает. Ваш труд требует большой ответственности, терпения и душевной щедрости. Пусть ваши усилия чаще получают благодарный отклик и уважение. Пусть будет больше спокойных дней, надежных коллег, профессиональных побед и простого человеческого счаст

3👍1👏1

17 Jun 2026, 13:14 UTC157 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔴 Ботулинотерапия зарекомендовала себя как важная терапевтическая методика в неврологии. Чаще всего она применяется в лечении постинсультной спастичности, хронических головных болей или кривошеи. Эффективность лечения может достигать 30–50%. В передаче «Возможности ботулинотерапии в неврологии» в рамках курса «Superheroes & Docmed Academy» врач-невролог, цефалголог Елена Александровна Кислова разобрала подробнее: ➡

2👍2🔥1

12 Jun 2026, 07:43 UTC178 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺С Днем России! Этот праздник – повод вспомнить о том, что сила страны складывается из ежедневного труда людей, которые выбирают ответственность, профессионализм и заботу о других. Для медицинских работников эти слова имеют особый смысл. Каждый день вы помогаете сохранять здоровье, поддерживаете пациентов в самые непростые моменты, принимаете решения, от которых зависят жизнь и будущее людей. Желаем вам сил, уваж

2👍1🔥1

11 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTC172 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пациенты с синдромом обструктивного апноэ сна (СОАС) часто отказываются от СиПАП-терапии (неинвазивной вентиляции с постоянным положительным давлением воздушного потока во время сна), и фармакологические методы лечения этого недуга продолжают активно изучаться. Группа исследователей из Германии провела вторую фазу клинического испытания противосудорожного препарата – сультиама, для лечения апноэ сна. Через 15 неде

3👍2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nevrosphera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jun 2026, 10:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz90 voters

Какой дополнительный клинический симптом наиболее вероятен у данного пациента?

  1. Атаксическая походка84%
  2. Вертикальный нистагм6%
  3. Точечные зрачки3%
  4. Повышенный аппетит7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Jun 2026, 11:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz36 voters

Какой диагноз наиболее вероятен?

  1. Гранулематоз Вегенера8%
  2. Синдром Чарга-Стросса6%
  3. Системная красная волчанка14%
  4. Узелковый полиартериит72%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,243,864 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nevrosphera | Неврология для специалистов | Новости, эфиры, клинические случаи” (@nevrosphera), 1,170 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevrosphera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.