Channel
@neveshtan_co
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,987subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001405856603 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neveshtan_co |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neveshtan_co |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 1,987 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 1,993 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,996 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 1,996 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 December 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 312 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
565 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 204 | 36.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 114 | 20.2% | |
| 🕊 | 50 | 8.85% | |
| 👏 | 32 | 5.66% | |
| 🙏 | 31 | 5.49% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 4.60% | |
| ✍ | 24 | 4.25% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 3.36% | |
| 👌 | 18 | 3.19% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 2.48% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 1.95% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 1.95% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 1.77% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.177% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✍ باهمنویسی موضوع امروز: امید بعضی واژهها فقط یک کلمه نیستند؛ هرکس آنها را با تجربههای خودش معنا میکند. باید نشست، به آنها فکر کرد، سؤال پرسید و نوشت. «امید» یکی از همان واژههاست؛ واژهای که شاید برای هرکدام از ما، داستانی متفاوت داشته باشد. همیشه از امید داشتن یا نداشتن حرف زدهایم، اما کمتر از خودمان پرسیدهایم: امید در زندگی من چه شکلی دارد؟ چه رنگی است؟ از کجا میآید؟ و چه زمانی از بین میرود؟ و... . حدود…
👍15🤩6🙏5🕊1
دوباره و دو باره و د و بـــا ر ه نوشتن را هم از ما گرفتند. شاید بگویید نوشتن که به امکانات خاصی احتیاج ندارد؛ هر کسی میتواند با یک خودکار، یک دفتر یا حتی با گوشیاش بنویسد. حق با شماست. اما وقتی هر چه در دل و ذهن داری، جایی برای انتشار ندارد، وقتی مدام باید تصمیم بگیری که بنویسی یا ننویسی، وقتی میدانی نوشتهات قرار نیست به دست مخاطب برسد، نوشتن هم کمکم به سکوت تبدیل میشود. بیش از شش ماه است که مرکز نوشتن ایران …
❤🔥35👍11🕊9🙏6👏2🔥1
حکومتی که جشن میگیرد در حالی که مردمش در فلاکتاند، دیگر تظاهر به عدالت هم نمیکند؛ فقط پیروزی خود را بر مردم جشن میگیرد. آلبر کامو #مرکز_نوشتن_ایران
❤🔥37👍23👎5👏5🔥2
هیچ چیز به اندازه نفرت از چیزی مشترک، مردم را متحد نمیکند. آنتون چخوف #مرکز_نوشتن_ایران
👍31👌11🔥9👏1
جی. کی. رولینگ، نویسنده مجموعهی هری پاتر، به دنبال حضور پرشور جوانان ایرانی در اعتراضات اخیر، در شبکه ایکس (توییتر سابق) نوشت: «به نظر میرسد ایران به طرز عجیبی پر از گریفیندوریهاست.» گریفیندور یکی از چهار گروه مدرسه جادوگری هاگوارتز است که نماد شجاعت بهشمار میرود. اما ویژگیهای اصلی گریفیندوریها چیست؟ 🦁 ویژگیهای اصلی گریفیندورها: شجاعت مهمترین ویژگی گریفیندورها شجاعت است. آنها از خطر نمیهراسند و برای انج…
❤🔥25👍6👎6👏5
اگر خواستید کیفیت یک عقیده را بسنجید، نگاه کنید که پیروان آن عقیده چه خدمتی به جامعه بشری ارائه کردهاند. جورج اورول
👍23❤🔥9
قلم را در مرکب فرو بردم و بر کاغذ آوردم، از آن خون بر صفحه جاری شد. پوست کاغذ شکافت؛ خون هزار کس در هر سطر میجوشید. از طومار شیخ شرزین بهرام بیضایی
🕊23😢8👍4
تحمّل کن ای ناتوان از قوی که روزی تواناتر از وی شوی به همّت بر آر از ستیهنده شور که بازوی همّت به از دست زور لبِ خشک مظلوم را گو بخند که دندان ظالم بخواهند کَند بوستان سعدی #مرکز_نوشتن_ایران
💯11👍8🔥5🙏1
رعیّت چو بیخند و سلطان درخت درخت، ای پسر، باشد از بیخْ سخت مکن تا توانی دلِ خلق ریش و گر میکُنی میکَنی بیخِ خویش رعیّت نشاید به بیداد کُشت که مر سلطنت را پناهند و پشت گریزد رعیّت ز بیدادگر کند نام زشتش به گیتی سَمَر بسی بر نیاید که بنیاد خود بِکَند آنکه بنهاد بنیادِ بد بوستان سعدی #مرکز_نوشتن_ایران
👏10💯3👀1👍1🙏1
زادروز نویسندهی مرموزِ موزماهی جروم دیوید سلینجر، در اول ژانویهی 1919 در نیویورک متولد شد؛ نویسندهای که هم بهخاطر آثار ماندگارش شناخته میشود و هم بهخاطر انزوا و دور شدن از شهرت. علاقهی او به نوشتن از نوجوانی شکل گرفت که با مخالفت شدید خانواده روبهرو شد. تجربههای شخصی و اجتماعیِ او از جمله حضور در جنگ جهانی دوم، نگاهش را به انسان و جهان عمیقتر کرد. سلینجر برای اولینبار در سال 1947 داستانِ موزماهی را برای م…
👍11🔥3⚡1🕊1🙏1
✍️ نوشتن از دل تجربهای تلخ جنگ جهانی اول فقط یک رویداد نظامی نبود؛ نقطه عطفی بود در تاریخ ادبیات جهان. وحشتی که جان انسانها را به لرزه میانداخت، خیلی زود راه خود را به شعر و داستان باز کرد. نویسندگان و شاعران این دوره، جنگ را نه از فاصله، بلکه با تمام وجود تجربه کردند و سپس آن را روایت کردند. 📝 واکنشها یکسان نبود. برخی نویسندگان با امید و همدلی نوشتند، و برخی دیگر با خشم، سرخوردگی و انزجار. برای مثال... ▪︎«…
👍7✍3👌3⚡1
🎭 بدرود با معمار کلمات و نگهبان بیدار اسطورهها تقارن غریب تولد و مرگ بهرام بیضایی در پنجم دیماه، طوری بود که گویی خود او آخرین پرده از نمایشنامهی زندگیاش را چنان مهندسی کرد که آغاز و پایان در یک نقطه به هم برسند. او که «شکسپیر ایران» نامیده میشد، در سالروز تولد ۸۷ سالگیاش، فرسنگها دور از وطن اما غرق در شکوهِ فرهنگِ ایران، چشم از جهان فرو بست. بیضایی تنها یک هنرمند نبود، او یک «پژوهشگر باستانشناس» بود که با …
🕊16❤🔥5👌2👍2😢2🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neveshtan_co. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 190,851 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مرکز نوشتن ایران” (@neveshtan_co), 1,987 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neveshtan_co.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.