Channel
@nevazhnoldc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,321subscribers
+294 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001964908552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nevazhnoldc |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nevazhnoldc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 1,321 | -45 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:44 | 1,366 | -41 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:09 | 1,407 | +454 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 953 | -38 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 991 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:27 | 1,003 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 1,023 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 1,027 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 1,027 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
331 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5429313256030221996 | 135 | 40.8% | |
| custom 5352919308391424163 | 76 | 23.0% | |
| 💔 | 59 | 17.8% | |
| 💋 | 51 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5352566270669642579 | 10 | 3.02% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда слушаю свои же песни и понимаю, что строчки, в которые я вкладывал свой смысл можно трактовать совершенно по другому, но при этом причастность к моей жизни не изменится.
custom 542931325603022199611💔4custom 53525662706696425793
Ты - моя жизнь Ты как Роза у принца Я тот самый принц Что нашел в тебе смысл Скоро
custom 542931325603022199617💔10custom 53525662706696425797
Почти свели новый трек, отсняли все, что нужно будет, скоро всё залью, спасибо за активность 🖤
custom 535291930839142416313custom 54293132560302219968💔6
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 535291930839142416317custom 542931325603022199610💔7💋1
На этом сообщении 50 реакций делаем, отправляю сниппет нового трека
custom 542931325603022199627💋16💔15custom 53529193083914241634
1. Да, будут, надо только аудиторию поднять 2. 🤷 3. 23 4. От души! 5. Очень люблю его музыку, каждый трек 6. Трек про отношения на расстоянии 7. Отлично
custom 542931325603022199615custom 53529193083914241639💋7💔1
Анонимные вопросы: t.me/anonaskbot?start=01jkr Завтра отвечу
💔9custom 54293132560302219965custom 53529193083914241633
Был вчера на первом сольнике sainty
custom 542931325603022199612💋6custom 53529193083914241633
Video message, posted without a caption
💔7custom 54293132560302219967💋2
Осколки прошлого в топе Яндекса, спасибо, ставьте больше лайков на трек и репостите, уже снимаем и пишем новое
💋11custom 542931325603022199611custom 53529193083914241639
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 535291930839142416318custom 542931325603022199612💋8
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @nevazhnoldc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Не Важно️️” (@nevazhnoldc), 1,321 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nevazhnoldc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.