Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Neuroradiology expert

Channel

Neuroradiology expert

@neuroradiologyexpert

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,530subscribers

+204 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002230800896
TypeChannel
Username@neuroradiologyexpert
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/neuroradiologyexpert

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3251,5301,427.57 August 2026 — 1,326 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,326 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,325 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,343 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,356 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,371 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,375 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,378 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,395 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,410 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,419 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,432 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,440 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,452 subscribers28 September 2026 — 1,480 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,510 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,530 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net +204. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,294–1,561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 12:401,530+20
6 Oct 2026, 01:161,510+30
28 Sept 2026, 23:161,480+28
15 Sept 2026, 17:381,452+12
11 Sept 2026, 21:021,440+8
7 Sept 2026, 12:421,432+13
2 Sept 2026, 14:181,419+9
30 Aug 2026, 23:541,410+15
28 Aug 2026, 01:051,395+17
24 Aug 2026, 20:451,378+3
21 Aug 2026, 12:281,375+4
18 Aug 2026, 03:281,371+15
14 Aug 2026, 22:451,356+13
11 Aug 2026, 06:531,343+18
8 Aug 2026, 01:131,325-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:311,326no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:101,326first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4437.3%
❤3126.3%
👍2420.3%
👏1311.0%
🤔21.69%
⚡10.847%
✍10.847%
🏆10.847%
👌10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC138 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Diagnosis ?

  1. Antrochoanal Polyp36%
  2. Inverting papilloma14%
  3. Mucocele2%
  4. Allergic fungal sinusitis9%
  5. juvenile angiofibroma39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍1👏1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC162 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

6-year-old boy with epistaxis and nasal obstruction Diagnosis : ? @neuroradiologyexpert

🔥4

6 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC149 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🔥2❤1

6 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC158 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Otosclerosis (Otospongiosis) @neuroradiologyexpert

❤3👍3🔥3👏1

6 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC158 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Otosclerosis (Otospongiosis) 🎯 High-yield concepts 🔹 Otosclerosis = clinical term (late inactive phase) 🔹 Otospongiosis = imaging term (early active osteolytic phase, easier to detect on CT) «💡 Exam Pearl: Although radiologists often prefer otospongiosis, the literature and clinical practice mainly use otosclerosis.» 📍Two disease patterns 1️⃣ Fenestral (≈80%) - Starts at the fissula ante fenestram - Causes sta…

❤2👍2🔥2👏1

6 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC155 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Findings ▶ There is a focal area of demineralization immediately anterior to the oval window bilaterally (arrows), consistent with an otosclerosis plaque. ▶ The magnified view in particular demonstrates the focal nature of this region of bone demineralization. Diagnosis: Fenestral Otosclerosis @neuroradiologyexpert

❤4👍3🔥2👌1

5 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC233 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

which statement is most appropriate?

  1. Probably normal (needs additional imaging)40%
  2. Abnormal60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥4❤1

5 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC224 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

53-year-old woman with hearing loss Diagnosis : ? @neuroradiologyexpert

🔥4👍2❤1

5 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC169 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤4🏆1

5 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC349 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Hypertrophic Olivary Degeneration (HOD) Unlike most transneuronal degenerations that result in atrophy, disruption of the dentato-rubro-olivary pathway (Triangle of Guillain–Mollaret) causes hypertrophy of the inferior olivary nucleus. This paradoxical enlargement is attributed to neuronal swelling, astrocytic proliferation, and vacuolar degeneration rather than true tissue growth. MRI timeline: • 3–4 weeks: T2/FL…

🔥4👍2❤1

5 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC183 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

An infarct within the brainstem that disrupts the central tegmental tract (which is part of the dentato-rubro- olivary connection and also known as the triangle of Guillain and Mollaret) can lead to hypertrophy of the inferior olivary nucleus. Other choices and discussion : this lesion represents an acute infarct rather than osmotic demyelination. Infarcts within the subacute phase have been reported to enhance up …

🔥5👍2❤1

5 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC179 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Finding: > DWI demonstrates an acute infarct within the territory of a pontine perforator branch vessel, which is likely related to underlying small vessel atherosclerosis and occlusion. > The three- dimensional reformatted time-of-flight MR angiographic image of the posterior circulation demonstrates only mild narrowing of the midbasilar artery, and focal moderate-to-severe narrowing of the P2P3 junction of the lef…

🔥4👍2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @neuroradiologyexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz56 voters

Diagnosis ?

  1. Antrochoanal Polyp36%
  2. Inverting papilloma14%
  3. Mucocele2%
  4. Allergic fungal sinusitis9%
  5. juvenile angiofibroma39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTCAnonymous Quiz70 voters

which statement is most appropriate?

  1. Probably normal (needs additional imaging)40%
  2. Abnormal60%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz79 voters

Which of the following statements regarding this lesion is TRUE?

  1. It can lead to hypertrophy of the olivary nucleus20%
  2. It is related to rapid correction of hyponatremia8%
  3. It can enhance up to four months from the time of the initial insult11%
  4. Symptoms can include contralateral cranial nerve palsy and ipsilateral hemiplegia20%
  5. It is also called Wallenberg syndrome41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neuroradiology expert” (@neuroradiologyexpert), 1,530 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuroradiologyexpert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.