4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,351–1,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 14:36
1,361
+6
10 Aug 2026, 10:22
1,355
+3
7 Aug 2026, 22:21
1,352
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:14
1,352
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 1,361 subscribers
Avg views / post
251
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
10 (15 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
2,010
Reactions total
52
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5253485446779921473
58
100.0%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что там с лакосамидом и почему о нем нет информации в Пособии по эпилепсии?
Есть одно доклиническое исследование у собак, в котором изучали фармакокинетику препарата (то, как лакосамид ведет себя в организме).
Далее — единственное упоминание этого исследования в консенсусе IVETF.
И всё 🥲
Так что, на сегодняшний день обсуждать практически нечего:
• нет клинических исследований у собак;
• нет опубликованных исследо…
За годы работы в клинической практике и диагностике выявила для себя несколько моментов, о которых актуально говорить всегда.
Вот они:
1. Пациент на МРТ должен попадать только после неврологического осмотра. Посылать на исследование, с мыслью «там сами разберутся, сделают еще две доп зоны» неправильно
2. Неврологи и сочувствующие (кто направляет на МРТ) — учитесь смотреть исследования, только читать заключения не …
Расписание эфиров закрытого чата Ассоциации на август 🤩
В этом месяце участников чата ждут два эфира, посвящённые одной из самых актуальных тем в неврологии и практической работе с МРТ.
📆 24 августа, 19:00
Открытый эфир: «Рефрактерная эпилепсия: с какого момента считать, что приступы не поддаются терапии, какие препараты выбрать, мои клинические случаи»
— Ольга Дубовицкая, ветеринарный врач-невролог
📆 27 августа, …
Сегодня (сейчас) мы встречаемся на открытом вебинаре Ассоциации неврологов!
Тема:
Атаксии. Классификация. Патофизиология. Клинические примеры
Лектор:
Артемьева Мария, ветеринарный невролог
22 июля в 14:00 (по мск)
Присутствовать онлайн будет возможность у всех участников, запись вебинара опубликуем в чате неврологов
Скоро опубликую ссылку
Собрала для вас знаковые статьи по ветеринарной неврологии в одном месте!
Та самая база, с которой должен быть знаком каждый невролог (и врач МРТ тоже)!
Переходи по кнопке ниже и скачивай себе ⤵️
Просто оцените уровень моих развлечений 😄
Последние несколько месяцев пробую разные сорта кофе.
И вот к каким выводам пришла:
• сильно кислотные сорта — вообще не мое (привет, Руанда);
• ярко выраженные фруктовые вкусы — тоже;
• неожиданно мой фаворит — растворимый Tasty в маленьких стаканчиках;
• люблю что-то мягкое, плотное и сбалансированное (Гватемала).
Кстати, недавно попробовала новую линейку 6:PM Coffee от…
custom 52534854467799214736
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @neurokatrin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Neuro Kate | ветврач МРТ” (@neurokatrin), 1,361 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neurokatrin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
