What would you do while under Iranian rockets fire? I made a small game in Mortal Kombat style https://dinokombat.radiantartshop.com/
❤🔥1🔥1😁1
Signed Yury N

Channel
@neuralnomads
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002142475962 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neuralnomads |
| Description | Practical and simple blog about Artificial and Human Intelligence 🤖💛🧘♂️ No scientific mumbo jumbo! - AI Nomad @gienjibot to amplify 🧠 intelligence and 💬 communication skills - Meatbag Nomad @radiantspace |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neuralnomads |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 51 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
54 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 25 | 46.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 18.5% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 14.8% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 14.8% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2024 to 5 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What would you do while under Iranian rockets fire? I made a small game in Mortal Kombat style https://dinokombat.radiantartshop.com/
❤🔥1🔥1😁1
Signed Yury N
New Grok video is out and it’s crazy. But real crazy 🤪
🔥1
Signed Yury N
Joe Biden achieved internally
🔥1🤩1
Signed Yury N
Guess what, OpenAI released a new image model under 4o brand. And it’s AMAZING 🤩
❤🔥3👍1
Signed Yury N
Creating an AI influencer or a personal AI photo model is THIS simple with https://avtr.app
🔥3
Signed Yury N
Can you imagine this?
🔥5
Signed Yury N
Try harder. Copy nothing. #FLUX #Jaguar
🔥3
Signed Yury N
Did I just eat the tastiest banana worth $6.2M? Or was it Justin Sun? #FLUX
❤🔥2😁1
Signed Yury N
Generated with FLUX + Hailuo models, WDYT?
🔥3
Signed Yury N
Grok is the new AI model, trained by Elon Musk's XAI company. What are the capabilities? Besides being optimized for chat and reasoning, it has web access which allows using it with real time data from Internet, like from X feeds. Is that the Perplexity/Google killer then? Well, maybe. It doesn't seem to have two steps of the separate web search and then processing of the data, which makes responses very fast. The q…
❤🔥4👍1
Signed Yury N
I have to admit it was some busy time in my life, but this blog will come back 💪 For now I want to share I'm exploring AI photography, using personalized FLUX models. There are many tools out there doing same under the hood, and I plan to come up with a review. For now lets focus on how a process for making a personalized photo may look like. I will use an example of FLUX text to image models. Those didn't come out…
🔥4👍1
Signed Yury N
AI's Latest Tricks: From Code Cops to TikTok Helpers Our poll shows you're hungry for AI news and language learning tips. So, let's dive into the latest tech advancements that's got everyone talking faster than some caffeine! 1. OpenAI's CriticGPT: The Grammar Nazi of Code So, OpenAI just came out with this thing called CriticGPT. It's basically like having a super picky friend look over your code. You know, the ty…
👍2
Signed Yury N
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @neuralnomads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 279,047 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Neural Nomads” (@neuralnomads), 51 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neuralnomads.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.