4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 276–279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 11:34
279
+1
15 Aug 2026, 18:56
278
+2
8 Aug 2026, 08:45
276
no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:36
276
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 279 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
14 (2 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
154
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
36
65.5%
❤
10
18.2%
👍
6
10.9%
👎
1
1.82%
😍
1
1.82%
😱
1
1.82%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Nike Cortez — кроссовки, которые пережили почти всё.
Выпущенные в 1972 году, Cortez стали одной из первых беговых моделей Nike. Тогда они считались настоящим технологическим прорывом благодаря мягкой подошве.
Но настоящая слава пришла позже.
🎬 После фильма «Форрест Гамп» бело-красно-синие Cortez стали культовыми во всем мире. Именно в них герой пробежал тысячи километров через всю Америку.
🌴 В 80-х и 90-х модель …
👟 Детские New Balance — подберем именно ту пару, которая подойдет вашему ребенку.
Мы индивидуально подберем детские New Balance под ваш запрос:
• размеры 21–35;
• разные модели и расцветки;
• поможем с выбором размера и проконсультируем перед заказом.
Детские кроссовки — это не только стиль, но и комфорт для растущей стопы. Правильно подобранная обувь помогает ребенку чувствовать себя уверенно на прогулках, в садик…
Почему у Nike Dunk столько расцветок? 🎨
Изначально Nike Dunk создавались вовсе не как лайфстайл-кроссовки. В 1985 году модель выпустили для университетских баскетбольных команд США, поэтому каждая пара получила цвета конкретного колледжа.
Именно отсюда и началась традиция бесконечных расцветок. За 40 лет Dunk превратились в настоящий холст для дизайнеров, художников, музыкантов и брендов.
Сегодня существует уже не…
3. Saucony Endorphin Speed 5
Цена: примерно 15 000–20 000 ₽
Легкие, быстрые и универсальные кроссовки для ежедневных тренировок, темпового бега и соревнований. Благодаря пене PWRRUN PB и нейлоновой пластине обеспечивают отличную амортизацию, возврат энергии и плавный перекат.
2. HOKA Clifton 10
Цена: примерно 14 000–19 000 ₽
Одна из самых популярных моделей HOKA.
Очень мягкая посадка.
Небольшой вес.
Отличный вариант для длительных дистанций и восстановления.
🏃♂️ бегуны на месте? В таких кроссовках ноги сами полетят к успеху! 😁
1. ASICS Novablast 5
Цена: примерно 16 000–22 000 ₽
Это одна из самых популярных моделей ASICS последних лет.
Очень мягкая и упругая амортизация.
Подходит для ежедневных тренировок и длительных пробежек.
Хорошо ощущается “возврат энергии”.
Комфортна даже при длительной ходьбе.
Saucony — легенда беговой обуви, о которой многие не слышали 🏃♂️
Бренд появился в 1898 году в США.
Изначально специализировался на беговых кроссовках и спортивной обуви.
Сегодня Saucony — это выбор профессионалов и фанатов уличной моды, ценящих комфорт и качество.
Мало кто знает, что их классические модели до сих пор вдохновляют современные коллаборации и streetwear.
Небольшая подборка товаров наших покупателей 🔥
Кто-то еще думает, а кто-то уже кайфует от новых качественных вещей по выгодным ценам 😎
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @netolerant_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“netolerant.ru — pre-order” (@netolerant_ru), 279 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netolerant_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.