Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НЕТ ФЛУДАМ ! 👆👆👆

Channel

НЕТ ФЛУДАМ ! 👆👆👆

@netflydam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

388subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002728092032
TypeChannel
Username@netflydam
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/netflydam

Growth

38813 Aug 2026, 13:48 — 388 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 14:39 — 388 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 13:4813 Aug 2026, 14:39
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 387–389 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:39388no change
13 Aug 2026, 13:48388first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

249 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53258120560944205589437.8%
custom 52917335435950403978132.5%
custom 52629696236277047084618.5%
custom 5467471665338273482187.23%
custom 5253647444356379580104.02%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2025 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @netflydam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 December 2025 to 11 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 May 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,920 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Подпишитесь пожалуйста 😭😭

custom 53258120560944205588

11 May 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,830 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Солнышки мои любимые 🥺🥺 Я создала новый аккаунт ( как обычно) где рассуждаю на некоторые темы , но не флуды . Возможно на новый аккаунт по флудам будут продолжатся выпускаться проверки , но все зависит не от меня . Просто помимо всего , у меня еще 6 тт аккаунтов по разным тиматикам , но сейчас я прошу поддержу для одного конкретного

custom 53258120560944205581

9 Apr 2026, 13:50 UTC≈2,340 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Хотя я могу сменить ник и начать снимать видео с разговорами на какую либо тему под паркур в майнкрафт ✌️✌️✌️

custom 53258120560944205587

9 Apr 2026, 13:48 UTC≈2,260 views10 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте , я смогла наконец-то зайти на этот проклятый аккаунт . можете присылать флуды на проверку

custom 532581205609442055810

28 Feb 2026, 16:44 UTC≈2,990 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Еще раз поясню немного , а то мне претензии кидают ☹️☹️☹️ Я не выпускаю видео из-за того , что не имею в этом смысла , так как заранее знаю что больше 1000 просмотров они не наберут . Тик ток изза голоса дал мне пометку меньше 16 лет , а как обжаловать я в душе не ебу 💘💘 собственно именно из-за этого вы не можете писать мне в личку или комментарии , модерация тик тока банит их и я на это не могу повлиять. Единстве

custom 526296962362770470816custom 52917335435950403974

8 Feb 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,700 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 532581205609442055813custom 52917335435950403975

8 Feb 2026, 13:36 UTC≈2,420 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💬 У тебя новое сообщение! Покажи киску ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

custom 532581205609442055812custom 52917335435950403974

31 Jan 2026, 23:59 UTC≈2,040 views31 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026

Тем кто про меня все ещё не забыл , спешу сказать что у меня вышло видео 🎉🎉🎉

custom 529173354359504039722custom 53258120560944205589

31 Dec 2025, 21:00 UTC≈2,830 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026

С новым годом 🎄

custom 532581205609442055815custom 52917335435950403977

16 Dec 2025, 18:43 UTC≈3,230 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52917335435950403974

16 Dec 2025, 18:43 UTC≈2,910 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Давайте я сюда просто Эдиты буду кидать с хуйней всякой

custom 53258120560944205585custom 52917335435950403973

16 Dec 2025, 14:21 UTC≈2,730 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Наебалово на 5 звезд , пользуйтесь на здоровье 💘

custom 53258120560944205589custom 52917335435950403974

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @netflydam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,405,935 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕТ ФЛУДАМ ! 👆👆👆” (@netflydam), 388 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netflydam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.