отзывы на обучения😇 забываю сюда скидывать, надо мне их как-то скринить и в отдельный канал кидать
❤36

Channel
@netaroshka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,932subscribers
-115 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002075427259 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @netaroshka |
| Description | Диана 🪬 Таролог и наставник в мире таро Инфа по обучению, навигация — всё есть в закрепах канала🙌 ЛИЧНЫЕ РАСКЛАДЫ НЕ ДЕЛАЮ! |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/netaroshka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 17,932 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 17,941 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 17,954 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 17,955 | +6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 17,949 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 17,963 | -23 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 17,986 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 17,995 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 17,990 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 17,998 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 18,003 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 18,017 | -18 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 18,035 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 18,047 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 18,047 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (11 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,080 |
| Reactions total | 624 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
905 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 394 | 43.5% | |
| 🔥 | 177 | 19.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 163 | 18.0% | |
| 😍 | 90 | 9.94% | |
| 🙏 | 34 | 3.76% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 2.32% | |
| ✍ | 17 | 1.88% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 0.884% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 905reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
отзывы на обучения😇 забываю сюда скидывать, надо мне их как-то скринить и в отдельный канал кидать
❤36
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ГОТОВЫ???🙂 ЗАПИСАТЬСЯ НА РАСКЛАД (кликабельно) оцените, какой прикол с оптовым пакетом я придумала, хз будет ли он вообще пользоваться спросом, но по-моему это ахуенная идея если вам хочется задавать вопросы картам на постоянной основе, а не на одну какую-то тему и каждый раз за это платить 🌟ДЛЯ ЗАПИСИ НА РАСКЛАД - @anrartm 😊 ОТЗЫВЫ НА РАСКЛАДЫ
❤37🔥10😍7❤🔥2💯2
ПОЧЕМУ КАРТЫ ПОКАЗЫВАЮТ ЧУВСТВА К ДЕВУШКЕ, К КОТОРОЙ ЧУВСТВ БЫТЬ НЕ МОЖЕТ? Такой вопрос мне задала одна из учениц в тарифе с сопровождением, думаю, вам тоже будет интересно, поэтому продублирую мой ответ Карты, которые потенциально показывают романтические чувства, могут выпасть даже на девушку, о существовании которой он не знает Карты в таком случае показывают восприятие такой девушки, или чувства, которые потен…
❤55🙏16🔥13💯1
карту дня на сегодня выбираем сами
😍68❤41🔥26❤🔥3🫡3
Девочки, первая пятерка стоп!!! Причем уже давно😁 Закрутилась и забыла, что мест на пробный прайс было всего 5, в итоге 9 человек записала😄 Девочки, которые уже ждут расклад - всё будет готово завтра, 2 авг Не ожидала, что так много вас будет🙂❤️
❤37🔥15💯11🍓1🫡1
ну что, ждали личные расклады от меня?😊 вы знаете, что я не делаю расклады массово, для меня очень утомительно в режиме онлайн консультировать кучу людей ежедневно, поэтому клиентов на расклады брала редко, по настроению и только за оверпрайс (ну например 50к рублей за 3 вопроса) - когда клиент ну вот прям очень сильно хочет именно ко мне и цена для него не имеет значения, ну, это достаточно частая практика у тароло…
🔥25🙏18😍13❤8🫡4❤🔥2
это же эмоции, а эмоции меняются триста раз на дню
❤🔥53❤14😍2
да конечно может, это просто человеческий фактор было у вас такое, чтобы вот вечер, грустите, чето накрыли эмоции из-за разных факторов, не знаю, песню в такси ностальгическую услышали, и вот сидите и хотите написать человеку сдержались проснулись утром, эмоции прошли, настроение кайф и уже и забыли что вчера хотели кому-то там написать а может вообще смеетесь и думаете господи, хорошо что не написала, что на мен…
❤🔥60❤33💯7
🌙В ТРИПЛЕТЕ жрица на чувства действительно может показать третье лицо, также, как и влюбленные, но такое можно увидеть только через доп карты, доп вопросы и сюжет самого триплета, то есть кто куда смотрит, кто за чьей спиной стоит, в общем, там целая схема, она есть у меня в обучении по Уэйту - «УЭЙТ ПЛЮС» - вот оно, кому надо такое можно увидеть, но нужно разбираться как это работает
❤42❤🔥2🔥1
если вопрос на ЧУВСТВА васи к ирине и вы вытащили одну карту, значит на карте изображен вася и его чувства к ирине. всё. чувства по жрице: ну вот какие у жрицы чувства на картинке? закрытость, сокрытие чувств и эмоций, внешний холод. да, карта про сокрытие чувств получается, какие-то чувства все-таки есть, но она просто их скрывает? не так все просто карта сама по себе холодная, следовательно, даже если чувства …
❤52✍11❤🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥87❤39❤🔥39✍6
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @netaroshka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NETAROSHKA” (@netaroshka), 17,932 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netaroshka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.