Channel
@nerdsofprey
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
547subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001198855100 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nerdsofprey |
| Created | 12 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nerdsofprey |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:36 | 547 | -4 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 551 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 553 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 556 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 558 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 556 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 555 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 555 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
144 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 67.4% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 8.33% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 4.86% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.17% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.39% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.39% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.694% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.694% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.694% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Джеймс Ганн в своем Instagram показал, что съемки «Человека завтрашнего дня» идут уже 79 дней. Для сравнения: согласно IMDb, съемочный период прошлогоднего «Супермена» занял около 150 дней. А рекорд принадлежит «Супермену» и «Супермену 2», которые снимали одновременно. Производство растянулось почти на 19 месяцев — более 500 дней.
❤6
Signed qnsh
Закулисный кадр со съемок фильма «Человек-паук: Новый день» с Томом Холландом (до и после).
😁7
Signed qnsh
Ищем админов в нашу команду! 👀 Если вы следите за новостями DC и Marvel, любите наш канал и хотите стать частью команды — пишите сюда и немного расскажите о себе!
😁5👍1
Signed qnsh
Новый постер «Фонарей». Уже на этой неделе!
❤5
Signed nlsrvprg
Постер к предстоящему D23. Помимо прочего, на изображении можно заметить Шторм. Возможно, на мероприятии продолжится череда анонсов каста нового фильма о Людях Икс.
❤5
Signed nlsrvprg
Variety поговорили с Сэди Синк, где она впервые открыто рассказала, кого сыграла. Если вы еще не видели «Человек-паук: Новый день»: да, она сыграла Джин Грей. И само собой, Синк вернется в фильме о Людях Икс.
❤8🔥1
Signed nlsrvprg
The Hollywood Reporter выпустил большой материал, посвященный сделке между Paramount и Warner Bros. Из статьи следует, что для многих ключевых активов Warner Bros. введены ограничения на одобрение новых проектов, а сама студия фактически работает в режиме ожидания до завершения разбирательств. Вероятно, это касается в том числе и DC — именно этим, возможно, объясняется отсутствие официальных анонсов новых проектов в…
😭7
Signed nlsrvprg
«Супермен» стал лучшим супергеройским фильмом по версии Critics Choice Super Awards.
❤13🤣2👎1😁1
Signed qnsh
Во время отчета перед инвесторами глава Warner Bros. Discovery Дэвид Заслав заявил, что «Человек завтрашнего дня» должен вернуть DC на победный путь в 2027 году. По словам Заслава, Джеймс Ганн полностью сосредоточен на работе над фильмом: Я видел несколько кадров вчера — они выглядят потрясающе. Вчера, кстати, у Джеймса был день рождения, а он всё равно работал. Он трудится по 16–18 часов в день. Фильм выглядит фант…
❤9😁1
Signed qnsh
По информации Deadline, Кит Коннор выбран на роль Скотта Саммерса (Циклопа) в новом фильме Marvel Studios о Людях Икс. Сообщается, что режиссер Джейк Шрейер и Кевин Файги провели встречи с несколькими претендентами на роль. В итоге на прошлой неделе студия остановила свой выбор именно на Конноре.
👍11
Signed qnsh
Зак Снайдер сегодня побывал в гостях у Warner Bros. Ждем новую коллабу с DC?
❤11❤🔥2😁1
Signed qnsh
Джеймсу Ганну — 60! С чем мы его и поздравляем, а также желаем справиться с творческими трудностями, кассовыми провалами, слияниями студии и наконец-то построить киновселенную, достойную фанатов DC.
❤11👏6
Signed nlsrvprg
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nerdsofprey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NERDS OF PREY” (@nerdsofprey), 547 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nerdsofprey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.