Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NEON BOTS

@neon_bots

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110,425subscribers

+716 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002355197723
TypeChannel
Username@neon_bots
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neon_bots

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

109,620110,425110,022.57 August 2026 — 109,709 subscribers7 August 2026 — 109,749 subscribers8 August 2026 — 109,620 subscribers9 August 2026 — 109,809 subscribers10 August 2026 — 110,084 subscribers11 August 2026 — 110,226 subscribers12 August 2026 — 110,425 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +716. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 109,499–110,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:45110,425+199
11 Aug 2026, 20:12110,226+142
10 Aug 2026, 21:51110,084+275
9 Aug 2026, 18:21109,809+189
8 Aug 2026, 14:53109,620-129
7 Aug 2026, 13:24109,749+40
7 Aug 2026, 09:01109,709first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 110,425 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,600
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.193%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 October 20257 August 2026)
Views total52,900
Reactions total102
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,539 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
88657.6%
👍20313.2%
🔥754.87%
😁664.29%
😭644.16%
🌚462.99%
👎382.47%
🗿382.47%
😢382.47%
231.49%
🤷‍♂201.30%
💘130.845%
👀110.715%
🥰80.52%
😈50.325%
😐40.26%
🕊10.065%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,539reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈12,900 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

All users have been unbanned from @FileToLinkiBot. ⚠️ Warning: From now on, users who violate the rules will be banned from both bots. Please make sure to follow all the rules.

23😭9👀4

Signed Vysoká Škola Ekonomická v Praze BM/18

5 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈18,100 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Both Bots Restarted..!! Bot 1 : @FileToLinkiBot Bot 2 : @FileToLinktBot This is the last & final warning for those who are sending, 18+ pron videos in our bot. Now, I'm directly banning all those users.

19😁13😈5💘1

Signed Vysoká Škola Ekonomická v Praze BM/18

3 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈21,900 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @M2LiNKS

Hola Everyone 👋 As you know, we have added verification in Emma & Nazriya bot. Many of you are asking why we added this and requesting to turn it off. We want to let you know — due to high load on our bots, we added this verification method to manage everything properly. As you all know, our bots are always up to date with the latest releases and our team works hard to upload everything for you ☄️ ❓ Is this verif

24💘2🤷‍♂2

Signed Tushar

23 Jun 2026, 02:17 UTC≈75,400 views259 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Telegram is unbanned now ✅ Try to use it without vpn.

👍11259😭55🌚12👀76😁5💘3

Signed Tushar

18 May 2026, 14:36 UTC≈117,000 views100 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bots Restarted..‼️

🔥4636🤷‍♂18

Signed Tushar

10 May 2026, 18:18 UTC≈130,000 views120 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

We Have improved our bot feature..!! Now you don't need to open any link just generate your fast download link. Bot : @FSearch4ubot

90🌚13😁8🔥6👍3

Signed Tushar

28 Mar 2026, 14:41 UTC≈212,000 views150 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

New Feature Of our bot, now you can get movies up to maxx size. Bot : @FSearch4ubot

10417👍13😁8🌚5🔥3

Signed Tushar

28 Mar 2026, 12:06 UTC≈108,000 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🎵 Ans Music Bot Update! 🎵 ✨ Search & Lyrics Improved Bugs fixed ✅ More relevant songs 🎶

22🌚4

Signed Tushar

12 Mar 2026, 02:28 UTC≈295,000 views126 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ Scam Alert – “Inside Ads” on Telegram I'm sharing this my experience with you because I used the account for a few days and even received a withdrawal but at firstly, they allow small withdrawals to gain your trust. But after my referral count increased, my account was suddenly banned, and I could no longer withdraw my balance. When I contacted their support team and asked for a proper reason, they replied that

70😁24😢14👍12🔥6

Signed Tushar

18 Jan 2026, 07:36 UTC≈148,000 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Kindly use this method to download from the chrome browser. If you are using the IDM method then ignore this message;

37👍11🗿7😢1

Signed Tushar

13 Jan 2026, 07:12 UTC≈143,000 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bots Restarted ✅ Old links will not work so create new links again

26👍12🗿2👎1

Signed Tushar

13 Jan 2026, 05:01 UTC≈126,000 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Both bots are down due to server issue, please wait we are fixing it..😴

15😢11🗿2

Signed Tushar

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @neon_bots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 318,617 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NEON BOTS” (@neon_bots), 110,425 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neon_bots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.