Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr Mushtariy Mamuriy

Channel

Dr Mushtariy Mamuriy

@neomaslahati

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,933subscribers

-258 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001440019058
TypeChannel
Username@neomaslahati
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/neomaslahati

Growth

12,92713,19113,0597 August 2026 — 13,191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,191 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,177 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,157 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,148 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,137 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,125 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,115 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,097 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,072 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,044 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,030 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,014 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,015 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,010 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,990 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,968 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,951 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,939 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,932 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,927 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,933 subscribers12,9337 August 202629 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -258. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,887–13,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 04:0412,933+6
28 Aug 2026, 05:3812,927-5
27 Aug 2026, 07:1212,932-7
26 Aug 2026, 08:1912,939-12
25 Aug 2026, 07:5212,951-17
24 Aug 2026, 04:2312,968-22
22 Aug 2026, 14:1612,990-20
21 Aug 2026, 02:3313,010-5
20 Aug 2026, 05:3513,015+1
19 Aug 2026, 06:3713,014-16
18 Aug 2026, 10:0313,030-14
17 Aug 2026, 09:5213,044-28
15 Aug 2026, 17:1713,072-25
14 Aug 2026, 07:2413,097-18
13 Aug 2026, 00:0413,115-10
11 Aug 2026, 23:1213,125-12
10 Aug 2026, 20:2113,137-11
9 Aug 2026, 21:5213,148-9
8 Aug 2026, 18:2213,157-20
7 Aug 2026, 21:0713,177first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 12,933 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,530
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held55 (31 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total139,396
Reactions total1,406
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 56s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,406 reactions across 55 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
74452.9%
👍25117.9%
🔥24017.1%
🥰604.27%
💯332.35%
👏261.85%
🤩130.925%
🌚110.782%
🎉100.711%
👌90.64%
🐳50.356%
😢40.284%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,406reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC576 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Yaqin 10 kun ichida ko'p murojaatlar "ona sutini ko'paytirish" vebinari haqida bo'lyapti. Qabul ochamizmi? Komentariyalarda ham onalar bir-biriga tavsiyasini ko'ryapmiz. Kimlarga kerak. -❤️- reaksiyangizdan bilib olamiz. Qabul ochiladimi yo'qmi?

18🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC≈1,410 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Juda yaxshi saqlangan sifatli qurilgan ulkan masjid

🔥185🥰3👍1

27 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,420 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Xitoyda non sayli. 🫓 Turistlar uchun sayr qiladigan joyga aylantirilgan Jome masjidiga bordik. Minorasi shunaqangi baland va chiroyli. Masjid hududi ham ulkan. Naqshlari esa o‘zimiznikiga juda yaqin. Faqat… hammasi savdo markaziga aylantirilgan. Ko‘z o‘ngingizda katta yer tandirda non yopib berisharkan. Nonning turlari biznikidan ham ko‘p ekan. Mazasi, ichidagi nachinkasi, shakli — hammasi har xil. Hatto tarvuz sha

22👏3🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 02:53 UTC≈1,360 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Assalomu alekum, Mushtariy Ma'murovna. Videoni bir nafasda kõrib chiqdim desam ham bõladi. Boshida rosa bosim bõldi. Negaki, man baxtli onalikda õqib õz tajribasi bor onalardanman deb õyliman. Shu ilmlarni man ham qachonlardir bilmaganman. Lekin bu borgan sari muommoga aylanib borayotganini kõraman. Õz yaqinlarimda. Hamma ayol va ona bilsa qanchalar hayot osonlashadi. Bola bola bilan emas, ona bola bilan bõladi. 4 ta

19

26 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,520 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Man baxtli onalik kurslari ,ona sutini kopaytirish, shamollashdan oson tuzalish isitma, vitamin d vebinarlari o'quvchisiman. Emizikli paytim homilador bo'ldim emizishni toxtatmadim vitamin d yod magniy ichdim oqsil yedim koproq iliq suv ichdim ikkala bolagayam hech nima qilmadi

13

26 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC≈1,600 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Oq chopon podkasining ohirida bu haqida gaplashdik. YouTube kanalimda ikkita ona bilan suhbat bor. Bu yerdagi telegram kanalimda ham ovozli podkast bor Hullas emizishni davom etish mumkin. Lekin qo’qmasdan bu ma’lumotni qabul qilishingiz uchun tushintirishlarni eshitish kerak @neomaslahati

7🌚1

25 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈1,650 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/jlxTKhtCgGA?si=EhfxEKjTtGJYOjtx

5👍4🔥4

24 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈1,910 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026

CAU “Oq chopon” podkasti chiqdi. O’zim ham siz bilan ko’raman. Ko’rgoch kommentlarida fikr-mulohazalaringizni yozing. Sababi doctorlarni suhbatga YouTube kanalimga taklif qilish niyatim bor⤵️ https://youtu.be/FpPJ5FQLdEs?si=6ehRZ_Re_V_pcUxe

12🔥9👍1

24 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC≈1,710 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Xitoy tilini bilmaymiz. Gruppaboshimiz biroz bilarkan. Lekin “qiynaldik” deyolmayman. Tibbiy sohadagilar bilan inglizcha gaplashdik, aylanishga chiqqanimizda esa joyiga qarab amalladik. 😄 Ba’zi joylarda ingliz tilini zo‘r bilisharkan, ba’zi joylarda esa oz-moz. Asosan yoshlar — xuddi bizdagidek — ingliz tiliga ko‘proq e’tibor qaratishgan. Ba’zi joylarda rus tilini ham bilisharkan. Albatta, aksent bilan. Lekin bema

43💯3

24 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,250 views90 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Teratoma tashhisi bilan operatsiya bo’lgan bolalarda dumg’azasida rossa katta operatsion yara qoladi. Bitishiga ko’ooooop vaqt ketadi. Suriladigan kremi 840 ming turadi 2-3 kunda tugaydi, o’shani davlatimiz olib beradi. Lekin ona sutini qo’shsak yara bitishi tezlashib ketadi Ona sutida o’zak hujayralar bor. Ular bolani yarasiga yetib borib teri to’qimasiga aylanadi. Ona suti - bu mo’jiza! @neomaslahati

🔥5627🥰7

24 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,780 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Reanimatsiya, konsultatsiya bilan mana 2 kundan beri davomini yozolmadim. Hali ham davomi qiziqmi? Yozishni davom etaymi?

26👍10🌚2

22 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,600 views141 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

To‘g‘risi, Xitoyga ketayotib ovqatlarini yeyishga qo‘rqib, o‘zimiz bilan ancha “zapas” olib ketdik. 😂 Non, pishirilgan go‘sht, mazali pishloq, tezpishar bo‘tqalar… Lekin bularni nonushtada yedik. Mehmonxona nonushtasida esa ikkilanmasdan yeyish mumkin bo‘lgan yagona narsa — qaynatilgan tuxum bo‘lishi mumkin 😂 Keyin bilsak, qiyinchilik faqat topib olguncha ekan. Uyg‘ur, turk, o‘zbek, qozoq, ozarbayjon oshxonalari bor

🔥6341👍27🤩10

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @neomaslahati. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 60,109 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

GINEKOLOGIYA RASMIY
@Homiladorlik_bolajinsi · 90,553
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr Mushtariy Mamuriy” (@neomaslahati), 12,933 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neomaslahati.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.