Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for нэнси холод

Channel

нэнси холод

@nensykholod1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,100subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001590893805
TypeChannel
Username@nensykholod1
Created22 March 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nensykholod1

Growth

10,09810,14110,119.56 August 2026 — 10,141 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,141 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,133 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,124 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,116 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,118 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,112 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,107 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,098 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,100 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,099 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,100 subscribers10,1006 August 202617 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 11 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,092–10,147 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:3410,100+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:1810,099-1
15 Aug 2026, 08:1310,100+2
13 Aug 2026, 23:4710,098-9
12 Aug 2026, 18:2410,107-5
11 Aug 2026, 14:5810,112-6
10 Aug 2026, 16:5310,118+2
9 Aug 2026, 19:2110,116-3
8 Aug 2026, 16:3110,119-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:4510,124-9
6 Aug 2026, 14:4510,133-8
6 Aug 2026, 10:1610,141no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4410,141first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 22 March 2022the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.5%
avg views ÷ 10,100 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,220
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (22 March 20226 August 2026)
Views total14,440
Reactions total2,470
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25,570 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💊25,570100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,570reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2022 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
760
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 14 we hold a reading for · 57%
Most on one post
243
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nensykholod1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 March 2022 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈5,810 views1,260 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

честно хотелось выпустить за лето треков синглов пять но ниче не получилось анлак :(

💊1,260

15 May 2026, 07:19 UTC≈20,700 views1,330 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

https://zvonko.link/dominanta luchshee chto ya delal out out out out out out out out

💊1,330

24 Apr 2026, 18:46 UTC≈26,500 views1,680 reactionsread 18 August 2026

15 мая кароче альбом 💿

💊1,680

14 Mar 2026, 14:20 UTC≈32,000 views2,080 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

добрый позитивный конструктивный

💊2,080

26 Feb 2026, 15:01 UTC≈36,100 views1,840 reactions23 Starsread 18 August 2026

25+ треков зацензурил и еще несколько на полный снос с площадок 🧐

💊1,840

25 Jan 2026, 18:38 UTC≈41,600 views2,070 reactions101 Starsread 18 August 2026

14 треков будет рэпа не будет я такого не делал да и как будто щас никто такого не делает в снг альтернатива нюметал шугейз все такое 🌮

💊2,070

1 Jan 2026, 13:13 UTC≈43,100 views2,010 reactions63 Starsread 18 August 2026

с новым годом

💊2,010

29 Oct 2025, 12:06 UTC≈63,000 views2,460 reactions148 Starsread 18 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💊2,460

25 Oct 2025, 15:33 UTC≈57,700 views1,750 reactions53 Starsread 18 August 2026

фа ватафа шнеля

💊1,750

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nensykholod1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 494,837 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

madk1d
@madk1dmus · 131,403
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026
ДУРКА+
@durka_public · 92,059
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 17 August 2026
Кишлак
@kishlak_family · 261,325
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“нэнси холод” (@nensykholod1), 10,100 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nensykholod1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.