Channel
@nemphiscrypts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,870subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002162532545 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nemphiscrypts |
| Description | криптодневник одного пилигрима (ex. nemphis криптс aka muar) автор канала не дает никаких финансовых рекомендаций, весь контент (включая закрытый канал) имеет только ознакомительный и развлекательный характер |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nemphiscrypts |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 5,870 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 5,871 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (27 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 68,580 |
| Reactions total | 634 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
634 reactions across 28 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5463202828623311517 | 310 | 48.9% | |
| custom 5462995944343630850 | 167 | 26.3% | |
| custom 5854766299690835045 | 157 | 24.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 634reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Один нфт-скамер из бычки 21 вернулся в твиттер с минтом своей новой нфт-коллекции Типы наминтили это говно и дали заработать ему на этом 1.2кк$ И кто-то всерьез продолжает говорить, что сейчас медвежка у нас
custom 546320282862331151731
Да
custom 546320282862331151725
Мужики, много миррорщиков и мошенников, которые пытаются за счет моего имени взять у вас деньги за мою информацию о твиттере Вот оригинальный линк на приватку (ту поддержку, что я оказываю при развитии ваших аккаунтов в твиттере - вы ни в каком мирроре не найдете) t.me/send?start=s-privatemuar
custom 546299594434363085022custom 54632028286233115179
Один из моих мультов в твиттере сегодня получил одобрение на монетизацию (учитывая обновление его теперь гораздо сложнее стало получить, но не для меня) Купил этот аккаунт у нигерийца на ОТС за 2$. Веду всего 12 часов. И уже первая выплата 28 августа на 670$. Все ограничения в голове - запомните Сегодня вход в приватку закрывается t.me/send?start=s-privatemuar
custom 546320282862331151726
Ща розочка подтянется с коллом и как tut ебанет на 10х 👄муар👄 👄перпы👄
custom 585476629969083504512
Новый краймик bluai из списка просыпается? 😈 👄муар👄 👄перпы👄
custom 54632028286233115176
гм, уважаемые перп декс юзеры extended приближается к тге, куча еще каких-то мусорных по типу standx и хибачи но самое главное - это важное обновление variational с интеграцией pro (речь про swaps для институционалов), которое по роадмапе приближает к событию с тге (ориентировочно в октябре-ноябре) про мой список с ерли перп дексами вы в курсе - клик напоминаю сейчас активность ретроспективно учитывается в txflo…
custom 585476629969083504516
Пока вижу как кто-то приватку создает по твиттеру, аж глаза режет какую хрень они предлагают Поэтому за символическую цену сделал свою, где поделюсь своим опытом t.me/send?start=s-privatemuar
custom 546320282862331151732custom 54629959443436308501
Прикол, truenorth за контент в твиттере косарь решила мне скинуть Пошла кормежка от твиттера. Кто про перпы пишет, советую про truenorth писать, мой подписчик тгшный тоже лутанул бабки оказывается. Может тоже перепадет вам за уникальный контент. Они уже 2 месяца еженедельно по 500-1000$ скидывают за контент лучшим авторам. Опять же как они определяются я хз, но я точно не в тиме, так что отбой с теорией, что тима с…
custom 585476629969083504524custom 54629959443436308506
Ни на что не намекаю Но три смарта из твиттера, что на ерли стадии колили делать Variational (когда даже поинтов не было) Сейчас шиллят truenorth (15% буст к поинтам) и txflow (5% скидон на комсу)
custom 546299594434363085022custom 54632028286233115176
Ебать☠️☠️☠️
custom 585476629969083504531custom 54632028286233115176custom 54629959443436308504
Сегодня их тоже ломанули Ебать по лезвию ножа хожу
custom 546320282862331151712
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @nemphiscrypts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 71,103 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“El Muar” (@nemphiscrypts), 5,870 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nemphiscrypts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.