3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 07:22
5
no change
13 Sept 2026, 15:01
5
+3
11 Sept 2026, 20:47
2
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
452.0%
avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
Avg views / post
22.6
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held
12 (10 September 2026 – 12 September 2026)
Views total
226
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
14
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
8
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dear Yasi:
ورود به فروشگاه موزهی تو، مثل سوار ماشین زمان شدن و پا گذاشتن به یکی از کوچهپسکوچههای دههٔ ۶۰ و یا ۷۰ میلادییه.
در نگاه اول ممکنه خلوت بهنظر برسه، اما در واقع اونجا محل امن خیلی از بازدیدکنندههاست و صرفا به خاطر اینکه اغلبشون همنشینی خودشون رو به جمعهای شلوغ ترجیح میدن و تراکم جمعیت زیادی وجود نداره اینطور دیده میشه.
رنگهای نود و یا خنثیای که توی طراحی شاپ استفاده شدن، تناسب جالبی با استا…
Dear Efi:
Your museum gift shop somehow, without ever actually trying to, turned into the physical version of HER: the lesbian & queer dating app. Mostly because pretty much everything in there seems to be exactly the kind of thing hot queer women -much like yourself💅🏻- would be into.
The background music is just your Telegram playlist playing on shuffle, so there’s always a chance that two visitors who started talk…
Dear Hasti:
When visitors walk into your museum gift shop, before they even get a chance to notice whatever song is playing -and there’s a pretty high chance it’s a chase atlantic song- it’s the sound of cats meowing that gets their attention.
Because your shop, especially during those seasons when the weather is either ridiculously hot or freezing cold, looks less like a museum gift shop and more like a cat shelter…
Dear Aria:
When visitors walk into your museum gift shop, the first thing they’d probably notice is how fucking cold it is in there. The AC is working overtime and honestly, no one’s complaining.
The shop has this little room inside it with a separate entrance from the main one. It’s basically the mini customers’ section. There are cute alternative plushies for sale, and a little table with paper and colored pencils…
Idk 🧍 pinned «سلام خوشگلا اینها خیلی دارن بیش از حد انتظارم طول میکشن و اول میخواستم صبر کنم همهشون اماده بشن و بعد یکجا بفرستمشون ولی میترسم وسواسم کار دستم بده و اینقدر کلید کنم روی ادیت کردن اونهایی که الردی نوشتم که نتونم اصلا برم سراغ باقیشون😭 و نمیخوام…»
Dear Sogand:
گیفتشاپ موزهی تو، فضای خیلی گرم، و نورپردازی اروم و ملایمی داره. هیچ اهنگی پخش نمیشه ولی احتمالا گوشه و کنار فروشگاه، عود یا شمعهای معطری روشن باشن که دلپذیری محیط رو دوچندان میکنن. خیلی وسایل مختلف و متعددی توی این شاپ پیدا میشن و مینیورژن تقریبا هر چیزی، موجوده.
اما اگر بخوام به پرفروشترین ایتم فروشگاه اشاره کنم، یه تقویم رومیزی سالانه با تم جوجهست که روی هر تاریخ، یه مناسبت جهانی عجیبوغریب…
Dear Helia:
گیفتشاپ موزهی تو، احتمالا یکی از اون فروشگاههاییه که ادم از همون اول نمیفهمه دقیقا باید انتظار چه چیزی رو داشته باشه. درواقع میشه گفت بیشتر از یه فروشگاه ساده، اینجوریه که انگار یک تکه از ذهنت رو گذاشتن پشت ویترین.
بخشها و قفسههای مختلفش به چیزهای متفاوتی اختصاص پیدا کردهان ولی با این حال، همهچیز جوری کنار هم قرار گرفته که انگار دقیقا باید همونجا باشه.
یکی از قفسههای شاپت که محاله حین ساعت کا…
Dear Muffin:
Your museum gift shop is one of those little gift shops that feels more like an extension of the gallery itself than an actual store. Its best selling item is probably a purple themed eyeshadow palette, with each shade named after one of Mitski’s songs; dead woman, first love, fireworks, star, and so on.
There’s also a huge display filled with unique and whimsical accessories, and don’t even think about…
و راستی در خصوص عکسها، ارتیست یا هنرمند خاصی مد نظرم نیست که از اثارش استفاده کنم و صرفا فقط سعی میکنم تا جای ممکن گوگل و پینترست (برای همین کردیت اکثرشون به امازون، ebay و اکانتهای رندوم پینترست هست راستش😭) و همه جا رو شخم بزنم تا چیزهای ناج و بامجهی غیر ai مربوط به ایتمهایی که درموردشون نوشتم پیدا کنم. اما اگر نشد، یک عکس رندوم میذارم که حس میکنم وایبتون رو میده.
سلام خوشگلا
اینها خیلی دارن بیش از حد انتظارم طول میکشن و اول میخواستم صبر کنم همهشون اماده بشن و بعد یکجا بفرستمشون ولی میترسم وسواسم کار دستم بده و اینقدر کلید کنم روی ادیت کردن اونهایی که الردی نوشتم که نتونم اصلا برم سراغ باقیشون😭 و نمیخوام این اتفاق بیافته و با زیادی جدی گرفتنش، فانش رو برای خودم از بین ببرم.
در نتیجه شبی هر چندتا که اماده شدن رو میفرستم و برای اینکه لازم نباشه هی اینجا رو چک کنید…
این رو فوروارد کنید تا بگم اگر یک موزه/گالری دربارهتون وجود داشت، توی فروشگاه هدیهاش چه چیزهایی رو به عنوان یادگاری میفروختن. شاید عکس بعضیهاشون رو هم گذاشتم.
•اگر چنلتون پرایوته و توش جوین نیستم، لینکش رو بفرستید ناشناسم.
•راستش نمیدونم اصلا اونقدرها کسی فورش کنه یا نه پس فکر کنم ظرفیت تا وقتی که خط بخوره؟🧍
•جوابها رو اینجا میذارم.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nemidooonambekhoda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Idk 🧍” (@nemidooonambekhoda), 5 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nemidooonambekhoda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
