Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Не место для эпатажа

@nemestodlya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002146481309
TypeChannel
Username@nemestodlya
DescriptionНа этом месте могло ничего не быть
Created23 November 2023measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nemestodlya

Growth

107 August 2026 — 10 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:0110no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:3210first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
3
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 30s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍861.5%
❤‍🔥17.69%
💊17.69%
🔥17.69%
😁17.69%
🙈17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2023 to 28 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2025, 18:05 UTC≈6,320 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как в тех самых играх с недетерменированной составляющей, хороший игрок, прежде чем принять решение, прогоняет его через парадигму "if — then". Вот и давайте подумаем, что будет, если долбануть по Киеву условным «Орешником» (10, 20, 50 «Орешниками» и т.д. для гарантированного эффекта). 1) Киев действительно серьёзно пострадает, будет много жертв и разрушений. 2) Высшие должностные лица, скорее всего, смогут спастис

👍3

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

14 Jun 2025, 15:05 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Если вы думали, что нет более жалких червей чем осколки дома Романовых, то остатки династии Пехлеви опережают их на порядок

😁1

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

14 Jun 2025, 15:05 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну я, мягко говоря, поспорил бы. Вот давайте сравним нос к носу, так сказать. Ирану в случае смены власти светит (беру только основные пункты, более мелких нюансов будет, само собой, гораздо больше): 1) потеря ядерных перспектив, но и сейчас в свете происходящего, признаем честно, их не очень-то много. Это не довольно надёжно контролируемая двумя адекватными странами (Китай+Россия) Северная Корея, это сам себе на ум

👍2

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

8 May 2025, 17:31 UTC65 viewsread 12 August 2026

Ну что ж, не зря Трамп постил мемы с собой в роли папы. Кардиналы намёк поняли и сделали всё в лучшем виде :)

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

13 Jan 2025, 05:30 UTC≈9,860 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кстати, при worst case scenario все нынешние потуги Трампа — это прелюдия к глобальному пиздецу. Оставались бы демократы, всё потихоньку двигалось бы дальше в том же ключе. А сейчас что он может предложить, что не выглядело бы поражением Запада? Ок, Крым признают не только де-факто, но и де-юре — с этим там общественное мнение уже смирилось. Дальше принимают какой-то компромиссный вариант по остальным землям — это то

👍2💊1

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

3 Aug 2024, 12:46 UTC192 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

3 Aug 2024, 12:46 UTC178 viewsread 12 August 2026

Хобби-хорсинг, говорите? Отрыжка современного "безвременья"? А помните открытие Олимпиады-80?

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

25 May 2024, 18:27 UTC178 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @one_big_union

Американская ностальгия Главный лозунг кампании Дональда Трампа - "Сделать Америку великой снова" (Make America great again). Когда же Америка была действительно великой? Сам Трамп об этом особо не говорит, поэтому поллстеры из YouGov решили спросить американцев, а Washington Post сделала интересную инфографику: 1. Ответы вопрос о самом лучшем десятилетии, от музыки и кино, до морального состояния общества и полити

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

25 May 2024, 18:27 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как по мне, хоть я и не американец, то 70-80-е. Годы, когда Америка действительно была олицетворением победы западных ценностей. Когда свободы не были пустым словом, когда они достигли максимума в условиях наличия крупнейшего внешнего противника, в рамках борьбы с которым приходилось не только словом, но и делом доказывать, что ты лучше, перспективнее, притягательнее. И почти все сегодняшние западники так и живут в

🔥1

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

17 Mar 2024, 14:30 UTC69 viewsread 12 August 2026

Выборы-выборы, кандидаты... разные

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

12 Feb 2024, 07:01 UTC122 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ночное, рычащее: Карл акрилом окрашивал кралю; Крейсером вгрызся в декреты Декарт.

👍1

Signed Max Pokrovskiy

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nemestodlya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Не место для эпатажа” (@nemestodlya), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nemestodlya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.