Channel
@neiro_masha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
20subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002555431418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neiro_masha |
| Description | Блог для тех, кто прошел тысячу курсов и все еще ничего не сделал Закрытый чат для смелых по стоимости чашки кофе - пиши в личку @masha_data |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neiro_masha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 20 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 20 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
80 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 40.0% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 36.3% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 8.75% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 5.00% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 13 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ответ на вопрос «зачем делать столько роликов?» Много контента = узнаваемость Узнаваемость = доверие Доверие = покупка недорогого продукта Недорогой продукт = прогрев к продаже основного продукта Еще есть сомнения?
🔥3👏2👍1
💡 Инсайт по работе с ии после взрывающей мозг домашки. [Дополнение к посту с лайфхаками] Разговаривайте с ии вашим языком, так у вас больше шансов быть услышанным 🫶🏻
👏3👍1🔥1
Что нужнее сейчас?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Сегодня еще небольшой прирост. Осилила 3 ролика только и опубликовала их уже после полуночи, тк вчера началось мое обучение по ии-визуалу , и времени стало значительно меньше. Но я все равно не сойду с этого пути 💪😁 Готовлю вам материал по триггерам и про то, как из одного поста сделать несколько. Что интереснее вам? Проголосуйте ⬇️
❤3🔥3
Сегодня такие цифры красивые 🥰 Ну и все эти сводки по статистике от иг тоже поднимают настроение.
🔥4❤3👏2🥰2
📌 GPT опять пишет как дурачок? Научи его нормально разговаривать Ты ему: "напиши пост про тревожность". Он тебе: "Вдохновляющий путь, обнимите себя и мир улыбнётся 🌸" Ты - в шоке. Он - доволен. Хватит это терпеть. Вот как сделать, чтобы нейросеть писала, как нормальный человек: 🔥 1. Ругайся, если нужно. Только по делу. Пиши прямо: – Не используй фразы: "пИшете, какие конкретно фразы вас не устраивают" – Без смайли…
❤2🔥1
Tone of voice или как заставить нейросеть говорить вашими мыслями. А ниже пост, который я написала, используя свои советы по общению с ии. 👇 И написан он на основе транскрибации этого подкаста. Изи? Изи. Сделаете хотя бы раз, и потом вас не остановишь 😉
🔥4❤3
🔡🔡🔡🔡 2️⃣ 📌 Как писать тексты с помощью нейросетей, чтобы это было в твоём стиле Нейросети - это не магия. Они не читают мысли. Но если правильно с ними работать - тексты пишутся быстро, звучат по-человечески, и реально помогают создавать контент. Вот 3 проверенные схемы, которые я советую тем, кто хочет писать в блоге легко, быстро и в своем стиле: ✍️ Вариант 1. Для ГУРУ. Если у тебя уже есть опыт, аудитория и п…
❤3🔥3💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3🔥3
И ВКонтакте тоже будет работать эта схема. (Спасибо Татьяне за активное участие 🫶🏻)Посмотрите не статистику. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ Секрет о котором все говорят - это оставаться видимым. А это можно делать с помощью коротких видео. Сегодня будет новое задание - будем разбираться с текстами.
❤2
Малююююююсенький прирост 🤏🥲 А почему? А потому что математика простая. Есть пост - есть просмотры Есть много постов - есть много просмотров Да, в выходные сложнее заниматься блогом (особенно тем, у кого семеро по лавкам или еще куча обязательств) Но все таки сделать хоть что-то - уже лучше, чем ничего. Едем дальше.
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @neiro_masha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что нужнее сейчас?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 13 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маша | faceless | блогинг | визуал для экспертов” (@neiro_masha), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neiro_masha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.