中国男子在巴西杀害18岁少女并将遗体喂狗,法院重判38年监禁 11月8日报道,巴西里约热内卢发生一起令人震惊的女性谋杀案。一名38岁中国籍男子因追求18岁少女遭拒,竟将对方杀害,并将遗体转移至另一处房产,导致遗体部分遭两只比特犬啃食。当地法院于2026年10月29日作出判决,判处男子38年监禁。 据巴西当地媒体报道,被告名为邱兆虎(音译,Zhaohu Qiu),又名“Xau”,此前在里约热内卢经营一家日式炒面摊,与受害者马塞尔·朱莉娅·阿劳若·达席尔瓦(Marcelle Júlia Araújo da Silva)及其家人相识多年,双方关系较为密切。 据调查,邱兆虎对年仅18岁的马塞尔产生了感情,希望与其发展恋爱关系,但女方始终只愿意维持普通朋友关系。 2025年6月12日凌晨,邱兆虎以准备了情人节礼物为由,坚持要求马塞尔亲自前往其住处领取礼物。 监控录像显示,马塞尔抵达男子住处后,数小时后,邱兆虎独自推着一辆盖有蓝色…

Channel
大发新闻🌈曝光 悬赏 新闻
@neihanduanzi112
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
21,446subscribers
-8,455 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002767229599 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @neihanduanzi112 |
| Description | 👉东南亚交流群 @gtdtjl6 👉投放广告联系 @Djdjd126 👉免费投稿曝光 @Djdjd126 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/neihanduanzi112 |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:20 | 21,446 | -74 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:21 | 21,520 | -56 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:47 | 21,576 | -50 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:06 | 21,626 | -42 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:59 | 21,668 | -62 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:58 | 21,730 | -32 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:17 | 21,762 | -42 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:07 | 21,804 | -47 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:11 | 21,851 | -39 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 21,890 | -48 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 21,938 | -46 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 21,984 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:30 | 22,002 | -34 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:08 | 22,036 | -20 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 22,056 | -30 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 22,086 | -56 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 22,142 | -35 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:50 | 22,177 | -59 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 22,236 | -44 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 22,280 | first reading |
Engagement
151 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.3%
- avg views ÷ 21,446 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,210
- 45 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.051%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 45
- of 151 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 151 (4 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 99,617 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 15:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,100
- Videos
- ≈5,140
- Links
- ≈315
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 16m 00s
- Average length
- 40s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 43.5% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 30.4% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 45 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
缅甸境内疑似诈骗园区扩建位置靠近DKBA总部 泰国媒体报道称,航拍画面显示,泰国达府帕帕县莫戈泰村对面的缅甸境内出现大型建筑项目,距离克伦民主佛教军(DKBA)总部不远。 据悉,诈骗团伙疑似正逐步将行动据点转移至该地区。由于当地与泰国边境交通相连,建筑材料、食品及燃料等物资可能通过相关通道运入。 外界担忧,打击诈骗园区可能促使犯罪团伙转移至更隐蔽、难以监管的地区,使诈骗网络继续扩张。 目前,该地区是否已成为新的诈骗据点,以及是否有相关势力提供协助,仍有待进一步调查。
#群友反馈:马来西亚槟城,峇六拜皇后湾广场附近。移民局抓了20几个狗推,全部拉车带走了!! 估计一个人起码一万马币才能放走。近期公寓打野风险超级大,各盘口小心
#群友爆料:马来西亚吉隆坡,国内精聊盘。 位置:吉隆坡南孟沙的 Novum 公寓,这个国盘黑公司是禁足,利用 Facebook 地推找客户。 行政:沈浩。管理:老王、老六(都有照片)。 这个老六天天飞机在线,电话故意不接,消息已读不回,装死!工资不发,连底薪都不发,已经过去一个半月了。当时答应的是10月20号发工资,70多个人的盘,连底薪都不给吗?才多少钱? 入职的时候,人事也是说得好听,结果也是鸡扒、不靠谱。消息已读不回,都是踢皮球,有什么意思?我请问你们,飞机还拉黑,电话不接,就是不想处理的态度吗? 位置在上面。如果两天之内没处理这个事情,我会再把详细位置,哪个办公室、哪个楼层、几号都说出来,还有你们的照片。 10月1号走的,说好20号给钱,现在已经一个多月了,人事也一直推,找谁都不搭理,那就爆了! 飞机拉黑,就是不想处理的态度。你们的照片我都有,一个都跑不了,大不了查天眼。不多说,没用的。11号之前,我希望有…
#澳门新葡京是个假平台 投稿:十七 时间:2026/11/8 标签:#曝光 #黑台 #澳门新葡京 #杀猪台 #黑款 #黑平台 533.cc这个平台现在是假平台,无缘无故冻结会员帐户,去找客服就说下注订单异常,就没有下文了,就说收到风控部门的通知,妈的,这个平台现在动不动就冻结账户,卡款,如果有同胞在这个平台玩的要注意踩雷
斯里兰卡贝鲁沃勒宝石市场捡到一本护照 本人可以联系我
澳门威尼斯人 2480.com黑平台,14号经人介绍说是老平台了能稳定提款,我就小玩了几百块,运气不错红了两千多也顺利提现,后面几天陆陆续续也红了几天,截止18号流水大概也有快5万,结果想提现提不出来了,账号还给我封禁了,问客服就是说账号违规下注,终止合作。兄弟们,找平台要放亮眼睛,还是要找有实力有担保的。 ✅东南亚交流群 @gtdtjl6 👉投放广告联系 @Djdjd126
#未来飞投曝光 在#未来娱乐 和#金铂娱乐 #旺旺娱乐 的#代理商 满嘴跑火车的翔哥 网名:【#金铂集团翔哥 (资金来往语音确认)】 飞机ID:@JBJTXIANGE 飞机号:+855 31 392 7446 未来电子飞投:@wldz 在未来一个两个星期输了17000U左右,当前总充值:26106 总提款:9756。我通过平台客服联系到上级,就是聊天记录中的这个翔哥代理商,在未来娱乐飞投,金铂娱乐飞投,旺旺娱乐飞投都有代理线。此人给下级画大饼,和 未来客服 @vip538 ,未来财务@vip539 还有招商@vip524 一起狼狈为奸踢皮球,说过的话不敢认账。第一次和上级代理商申请转运金送了288,过后一段时间和他再申请月初红包和转运金、彩金就开始各种话术推脱。 他自己承诺到11月1号连带前面总负盈利,红包 ,各种彩金一并在1号兑给我,全算上给总输赢的15%负盈利,承诺的时候拍着胸脯,牛逼哄哄的,快到给我兑负盈利的时候再问他…
什么年代了 还搞这种十年前的套路 骗子用户名 @sdsdffdew
#黑平台雅虎体育黑我53W 投稿:佳佳 时间:2026/11/3 标签:#曝光 #黑台 #KK娱乐 #杀猪台 #黑款 #黑平台 经朋友介绍到 #雅虎体育 玩了快一年了,刚开始小赢都给出款,慢慢跟平台熟悉了,也开始信任这个台子以后,我开始加大本金去投注,直到26年6月30号,我以25万多本金在群里跟着群管理带车一路打到53万,管理带单结束后,我进行提款被卡,然后管理帮去处理,说帮我担保出款,没过几分钟我发雅虎体育账户就被禁用了,也登陆不上去。 然后那个几把维护小微跟我进行交涉,说我的账号有问题,玩了一年不输钱,说狗庄不想和我赌?说我不是质量会员,不和我玩了?是你们代理线活不起了吧?告诉我你们是吃流水返点的,不是吃负盈利。 我告诉你 你舔你妈的逼长大的。。。玩了半年百家乐升级到v8你说不是质量玩家 你们把v8玩家就这么玩是吗? 更可笑的是你们低智商维护让我去报警处理,让我去找公安? 你们公司是没人做维护了吗?什么牛马都招? …
西港中国女子遭枪击案:3人被捕 11月4日晚11点左右,西港第4分区发生一起枪击案,一名中国女子遭中国男子持枪射击,子弹从腹部射入并贯穿背部,伤势严重,已被紧急送往金边甘密医院抢救。 警方接报后赶赴现场,约一小时后抓获一名中国男性嫌疑人,随后又逮捕另外两名涉嫌参与案件的中国男子。目前,3人已被带往西港省警察局接受调查。
#网友反馈:西港红灯笼赌场目前正在检查,宪兵在门口守着,门口停了好几辆警车。
Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @neihanduanzi112. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 14 posts on @neihanduanzi112 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 1 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 30 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@gtdtjl6 · 65,86222 postsN9.COM|官方频道
@N9_com1 · 13,31818 postsN9.COM 福利频道导航
@n9pd888 · 7,15815 posts极搜🔍资源搜索@JISOU
@jisou2 · 2,551,9328 postsEBpay官方频道
@EBpayHQ · 46,2945 posts易换官方频道(最新)
@yihuanqz · 20,9355 posts今日头条 新闻 曝光 大事件
@jpzxwssj · 60,3684 posts欧易验群管家 @oyqg
@oyqg · 145,4311 post欧易公群频道@XYXY
@xyxy · 116,6721 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“大发新闻🌈曝光 悬赏 新闻” (@neihanduanzi112), 21,446 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/neihanduanzi112.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.