Channel
@nedalaw
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
443subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001058313146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nedalaw |
| Description | بامجوز از وزارت علوم،تحقیقات و فناوری در زمینه علوم انسانی www.neda.ac شماره تماس:91079547(21)98+ |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nedalaw |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 443 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:38 | 443 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
⚜دوره جامع مشاور حقوقی⚜ 📌با مجوز رسمی از وزارت علوم تحقیقات و فناوری 📌با تدریس توسط برترین اساتید کشور 📌جهت ورود به بازار کار 📌دریافت گواهینامه معتبر و قابل ترجمه از وزارت علوم تحقیقات و فناوری کسب اطلاعات بیشتر با ارسال کد 4 به شماره 09194674192 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
💢اگر به خورشید نگاه کنی، تاریکی پشت سرت خواهد بود... 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
⚫️ شهادت امام رضا (ع) تسلیت باد. 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
💢 هر روز کاری انجام بده که تو را به فردایی بهتر، نزدیکتر کند... 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
⚫️ رحلت رسول اکرم(ص) تسلیت باد. 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
💢 استاد تغییر باشیم ،نه قربانی تقدیر... 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
💢 فهمیده ام هر چقدر سخت تر کار میکنم، انگار شانس بیشتری به سراغم می آید... 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
💢 من موفق میشم نه فورا، اما قطعا... 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
موسسه آموزش عالی آزاد ندا(نماد دانش امروز) pinned «با درود خدمت شما عزیزان ضمن آرزوی شادابی و تندرستی برای یکایکتان، مدتی بود که این کانال در حالت نیمه فعال قرار داشت ولی امروز خوشحالیم اعلام نماییم که مجدداً به فعالیت خود برمیگردیم! هدف ما در این کانال، آموزش های مفید برای دستیابی به موفقیت است. از شما…»
با درود خدمت شما عزیزان ضمن آرزوی شادابی و تندرستی برای یکایکتان، مدتی بود که این کانال در حالت نیمه فعال قرار داشت ولی امروز خوشحالیم اعلام نماییم که مجدداً به فعالیت خود برمیگردیم! هدف ما در این کانال، آموزش های مفید برای دستیابی به موفقیت است. از شما دعوت مینماییم تا با ما همراه شوید و با دنبال کردن کانال از مقالات ، ویدیو ها ، پادکست ها و مطالب مفیدی که با شما به اشتراک می گذاریم، لذت ببرید. همچنین می توانید…
💢 ۱۷ شهریور؛ روز جهانی سواد آموزی 🌐 با ما در ارتباط باشید: اینستاگرام | تلگرام @nedalaw 🔹🔸🔹🔸🔹
کدام یک از گزینه ها ذیل در صلاحیت ضابطان دادگستری نیست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nedalaw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدام یک از گزینه ها ذیل در صلاحیت ضابطان دادگستری نیست؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2022 to 5 October 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 854,181 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“موسسه آموزش عالی آزاد ندا(نماد دانش امروز)” (@nedalaw), 443 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nedalaw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.