Разбираемся в ПК и играх.
Автор - @nedomainer13
Менеджер - @oldpurple
Реклама - https://telega.in/c/ned0news
Не теряем связь - https://max.ru/channel_ned0news
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,434–10,479 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 10:54
10,439
-2
14 Aug 2026, 02:14
10,441
-6
11 Aug 2026, 15:42
10,447
-4
10 Aug 2026, 14:58
10,451
-7
9 Aug 2026, 15:14
10,458
-11
8 Aug 2026, 16:04
10,469
-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:02
10,470
-4
7 Aug 2026, 04:45
10,474
first reading
Engagement
125 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 10,439 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
125 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
125
of 125 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 123 of 125 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
125 (6 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
177,747
Reactions total
3,525
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈16,000
Videos
≈289
Links
≈8,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
47s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,525 reactions across 123 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
1,053
29.9%
😁
454
12.9%
🤯
332
9.42%
🤬
318
9.02%
🔥
314
8.91%
👍
296
8.40%
😐
117
3.32%
🤔
96
2.72%
😢
93
2.64%
🫡
82
2.33%
🤪
67
1.90%
🍌
45
1.28%
😨
41
1.16%
😱
41
1.16%
❤🔥
39
1.11%
👏
27
0.766%
🗿
18
0.511%
🙈
16
0.454%
🤷
16
0.454%
⚡
14
0.397%
7 further kinds
46
1.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 123 of the 125 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,525reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 125 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👊 PC Partner предупредили о надвигающемся дефиците видеокарт.
Это фирма выпускает Zotac, Inno3D и Manli. Самый большой рост цен ожидают в бюджетных решениях, но предупреждают и о росте цен на CPU и прочие комплектующие.
Во второй половине года они ожидают ухудшение финансовых показателей. Сократить ущерб они хотят за счет поставок новых серверов и продуктов, связанных с ИИ (даже не удивили).
😎Не теряем связь — VK …
🫦 Прогресс ПК развернулся: геймеры выбирают DDR4.
32 ГБ DDR5 уже обходятся в $380–600, а подорожавшей DDR4 в $150–180. То есть DDR4 втрое дешевле и останется актуальной еще несколько лет.
Аналитики считают, что пик цен DDR5 будет только в 2027 году, но даже в 2028 году память не вернется на старые цены "до кризиса".
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
🫦 Геймер снизил температуру ноутбука при помощи металлического стола.
На деревянном столе Core i7-14650HX в Cyberpunk грелся до 80–90°C, перенос ноутбука на металл снизил температуры до 75–83 °C.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
🥸 KB5121003 ломает игры с антипиратскими защитами.
Есть много сообщений о вылетах ARC Raiders и The Finals, но под ударом все игры с защитой вроде Denuvo.
Удаление KB5121003 из Windows 11 проблему решает. Вероятно, есть какой то конфликт с защитами на уровне ядра.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
😑 Steam Deck смог запустить игру с PS5.
Игру Astro’s Playroom успешно запустили через эмулятор SharpEmu, но играть пока невозможно. Проект выдает 0,5–1 FPS еще до главного меню, во время заставки PlayStation Studios.
В любом случае, эксперимент запуска был удачным, дальше дело за оптимизацией.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
🫢 SK hynix не меняет SSD по гарантии.
RMA отдел рассказывает клиентам басни, что на их складах просто нет замены для такой модели SSD. Предлагают оформить обычный возврат по цене покупки до подорожания.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
🫢 Micron хотела заменить DDR5, но передумала.
Юзер обратился в RMA с поломкой плашки SODIMM от Crucial, ему сразу же оформили возврат.
Позже Micron переобулась и сказала, что у них нет плашки на замену. Вернуть плашку тоже отказались, только предложили возврат стоимости по старым ценам.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
👍 Кризис угробил RTX 5060 Ti 16 ГБ: цена уже на 88 % выше РРЦ.
Видеокарта выходила за 429 долларов, а сейчас оценивается почти в 800 долларов. Версия на 8 ГБ стоит сейчас 450 долларов, а значит доплата за 16 ГБ памяти составляет 350 долларов.
В Китае RTX 5060 Ti 16 ГБ стоит еще больше, а в Великобритании иногда даже опережает по цене RTX 5070.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
🙂 Sony показала работу Enhanced PSSR на PS5 Pro.
Базовая CPN использовала около 30 % параметров в 540p. В новой KPN их число увеличилось до 90 % в 540p и ниже. К тому же, на 4K ресурсы почти не тратятся.
Новая модель работает во всех играх с обычным PSSR. Sony говорит, что она просто заменяет первую модель, с которой вышла PS5 Pro.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
🎒 Дополнение Man of Honor для Mafia: The Old Country обошли через гипервизор.
DLC добавил в игру несколько новых глав, где предстоит помогать Эннио Сальери, который потом станет ключевым героем Mafia 1.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
🙂 Продажи Resident Evil Requiem показали актуальность дисков.
Capcom заявила, что 90 % продаж были цифровыми, но анализ показывают совершенно другую картину.
Во Франции примерно 55 % купили диски, в Японии это 51 %, в Австралии 43 %, а в Великобритании — 40 % соответственно. В США меньше всего купили диски, там это 22 %.
😎Не теряем связь — VK / MAX
👍8🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 125 posts we hold for @ned0news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ned0news edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 779,158 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мой Компьютер @mknewsru · 209,225 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НедоNews” (@ned0news), 10,439 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ned0news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.