Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ابطال الذهبي ثالث متوسط

Channel

ابطال الذهبي ثالث متوسط

@nd2ph2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,067subscribers

+7,680 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003285664805
TypeChannel
Username@nd2ph2
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 4 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nd2ph2

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,3879,0675,2274 September 2026 — 1,387 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,508 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,587 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,609 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,042 subscribers27 September 2026 — 2,673 subscribers5 October 2026 — 4,150 subscribers11 October 2026 — 5,729 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,088 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,856 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,191 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,698 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,964 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,177 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,543 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,067 subscribers4 September 20265 November 2026
16 measurements spanning 62 days, net +7,680. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 235–10,219 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 21:079,067+524
2 Nov 2026, 14:168,543+366
31 Oct 2026, 00:548,177+213
27 Oct 2026, 23:507,964+266
25 Oct 2026, 01:107,698+507
21 Oct 2026, 17:397,191+335
18 Oct 2026, 02:576,856+768
14 Oct 2026, 23:266,088+359
11 Oct 2026, 22:195,729+1,579
5 Oct 2026, 08:194,150+1,477
27 Sept 2026, 08:012,673+631
18 Sept 2026, 11:372,042+433
14 Sept 2026, 10:371,609+22
11 Sept 2026, 02:581,587+79
5 Sept 2026, 18:161,508+121
4 Sept 2026, 17:221,387first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 4 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 9,067 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,760
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held44 (4 December 2025 – 6 November 2026)
Views total162,220
Reactions total3,719
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 11:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
56
Videos
1
Links
32

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,496 reactions across 42 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,43476.4%
👍51011.3%
👏1553.45%
😁1132.51%
🔥1092.42%
🖕481.07%
🍓170.378%
💩150.334%
🥰150.334%
❤‍🔥110.245%
🗿110.245%
🏆100.222%
🥱80.178%
🌭60.133%
🍾50.111%
🤬50.111%
💯40.089%
🌚30.067%
😍30.067%
😘30.067%
6 further kinds110.245%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,496 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 21:23 UTC≈4,270 views269 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ما ظل شي وندخل لل10K

❤269

4 Nov 2026, 19:49 UTC≈5,980 views284 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

اوكييي احد كالكم انه هذا كلامكمم يخلي بداخلنا فراشاااات🤌🏻🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 والكثيررر من الرسائل الحلوه بعد 😔🩷

❤284

Signed ست نبأ ( مُساعدة الاستاذ علي الذهبي )

4 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC≈6,260 views82 reactionsread 8 November 2026

كل ملزمة توصلكم من المكتبة وياها هدية👏

🔥82

Signed قسم التسجيل الالكتروني ️

4 Nov 2026, 07:18 UTC≈5,870 views81 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @Third_tests31Video

​"ثورةُ العلمِ تبدأ بـ زلزال.. ادرس بقوة، واهزم الصعاب." 💎 🌀 متوفر الان 🌀 جميع إصدارات الاستاذ علي الذهبي لجميع المراحل ✨ 🤔من الاول متوسط الى السادس العلمي ⚙️ ​💎 للحجز والاستفسار: ​ تليكرام: @zilzal_library 📱 واتساب: 07746393144 📱 أسرع من البرق.. زلزال يوصلك وين ما تكون!

❤81

Signed قسم التسجيل الالكتروني ️

2 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC≈7,550 views105 reactionsread 8 November 2026

الاسئلة اهنا دزوها @Ali99_g

❤105

Signed ست نبأ ( مُساعدة الاستاذ علي الذهبي )

2 Nov 2026, 15:52 UTC≈7,870 views113 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤113

Signed ست نبأ ( مُساعدة الاستاذ علي الذهبي )

2 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC≈7,410 views97 reactionsread 8 November 2026

هاي اسئلة شهر والاول

❤97

Signed ست نبأ ( مُساعدة الاستاذ علي الذهبي )

2 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC≈8,790 views84 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤84

Signed ست نبأ ( مُساعدة الاستاذ علي الذهبي )

2 Nov 2026, 15:50 UTC≈8,210 views72 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤72

Signed ست نبأ ( مُساعدة الاستاذ علي الذهبي )

2 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈6,680 views98 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤98

Signed ست نبأ ( مُساعدة الاستاذ علي الذهبي )

2 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC≈6,630 views104 reactionsread 8 November 2026

@Ali99_g

😁104

Signed قسم التسجيل الالكتروني ️

2 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC≈6,630 views123 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👏123

Signed قسم التسجيل الالكتروني ️

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @nd2ph2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Oct 2026, 11:17 UTCAnonymous Poll1,260 voters approx.

امتحان فاينل باجر 10:00 م يوم الاحد الى 7:00صباحا يوم الاثنين

  1. اييي75%
  2. لا33%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ابطال الذهبي ثالث متوسط” (@nd2ph2), 9,067 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nd2ph2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.