Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Борзых|Unstoppable CPD~Неудержимое Развитие Учителя

Channel

Борзых|Unstoppable CPD~Неудержимое Развитие Учителя

@nb_elt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,655subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001609026878
TypeChannel
Username@nb_elt
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nb_elt

Growth

1,6551,6581,656.57 August 2026 — 1,658 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,658 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,657 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,656 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,657 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,655 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 13 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,655–1,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 12:111,655-2
17 Aug 2026, 18:381,657+1
14 Aug 2026, 08:251,656-1
11 Aug 2026, 09:371,657-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:571,658no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:461,658first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 1,655 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held12 (5 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total567
Reactions total76
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8639.3%
🔥7835.6%
❤‍🔥104.57%
🍾94.11%
💔83.65%
52.28%
🎉52.28%
🙏52.28%
🤩52.28%
🏆41.83%
👏41.83%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC97 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I don’t want English teachers to feel lonely 💚 We spend so much time connecting with our students, but we often end up alone with our own questions, doubts, and fatigue. Sometimes you just want to message a colleague: What would you do in this situation? Any material recommendations? Who else is sick of checking homework late into the night? Or simply share a cool phrase you caught in a film/podcast. That’s why

6🔥4❤‍🔥3🤩1

31 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC201 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

No filters. Happy birthday to me! 🥳🎈🎂 Happy to be celebrating it in Tbilisi.

33🍾9🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC269 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Death by lesson planning. So familiar. I used to spend from 4 to 6 hours on a single lesson prep. And they sucked. Then, I really learned about lesson outcomes - and lesson steps. Not the buzzwords. The realzies. Since I’m a slow learner, it didn’t happen overnight. I tired, stumbled, made mistakes, but I kept going. How to spend less time on preparing games and have more engagement in the class? My rule of t

12🤩4🔥2🙏1

21 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC320 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Small no more. I've been working a lot to get my numbers: conferences, certificates, books, trips, contacts. But honestly? Those ain't everything) After achieving my Delta, I faced a wave of burnout so powerful it made me feel as if earning it was insignificant. Insignificant. Ever been there? Collected all the shiny things, built the network, stacked the credentials… and still felt hollow? And I realised that f

🔥148💔8🙏3

15 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC292 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

We sold a course live on stage. Right after, we broke down exactly why you wanted to buy it. This weekend, Ekaterina Safonova and I gave a talk about CPD. Why we do it. And what we pay for it. ⚡ We kicked off with a Delta-style test. Four questions. I didn't tell anyone, but I'd completely made up two of them, mashed some terminology together, and framed it all as Let's check your professionalism. These kind of

9❤‍🔥2👏2🔥2🙏1

10 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC291 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Tomorrow I'm doing a joint talk with Ekaterina Safonova at SELF-9. We're going to be questioning something that doesn't get talked about enough: is the CPD we invest in as teachers really necessary, given what we actually pay for it? And I don't just mean the literal price, as in the course fees, the subscription costs, the conference tickets that quietly eat into our income. I mean the metaphorical price too. Th

🔥151

8 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC298 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Here are the results!! We started working together in February, and she took her first TOEFL in mid-May, scoring a 3.0 in Writing and a 5.5 in Speaking. Mind you, a 6.0 is the absolute maximum in TOEFL Just under a month later, in June, she sat for the exam again and raised her Writing score to an impressive 4.0, landing an Overall Score of 100 (C1)! 🎉 [that was the initial request] Her Speaking was on track t

🔥7🎉5🏆4👏21

3 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC350 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

So, in my last post I talked about the new things they added to the TOEFL exam. This time I want to focus on my student and her biggest struggle: stress. Honestly, she was so pressed for time. Especially in the email task. You know, you only get 7 minutes. Seven. And she said, she would just freeze. She had to do the task again and again and again and again because it was really hard for her to focus. The clock was

🔥62

25 Jun 2026, 19:42 UTC382 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Wait, TOEFL added email writing in 7 minutes? 😳 In February 2026, I got a new student - and that’s how I discovered the updated format. Here’s what hit me hardest: 📧 Email writing – 7 min 💬 Discussion post writing – 10 min So, basically, you don’t have time to breathe. Plus, there’s Listen and Repeat task. 🤨 The test is super intense. If you’re ambitious for a high score, you’re technically beating the clock.

16🔥83

23 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC316 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥6

23 Jun 2026, 10:54 UTC326 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Elusive as ever: I promised a podcast and then disappeared. Well, I went to Trendy St Pete and then on family vacation! Here’s the podcast 🔽 If useful, please let me know with your reactions

❤‍🔥5

5 Jun 2026, 14:32 UTC415 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥13

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nb_elt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,344,545 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Борзых|Unstoppable CPD~Неудержимое Развитие Учителя” (@nb_elt), 1,655 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nb_elt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.