Channel
@nazokbin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
418subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001008957457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nazokbin |
| Description | بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم تمام مطالب كانال نازكبين توليدي و درجهت نقد، نظر و تحليل مسائل و شبهات روز ميباشد. @aghajani56 |
| Created | 13 December 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nazokbin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 418 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 418 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 935 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مهمترین ابزار جنگی ما و بزرگترین نقطه ضعف آمریکا در حال حاضر، #قیمت_نفت است و مهمترین حربه آمریکا برای بالانرفتن و پایین آوردن آن نیز عملیات رسانهای و جنگ روانی است، در چنین شرایطی هر اقدام ما باید با پیوستی برای نرخ نفت باشد تا این مهمترین ابزار ما ضعیف نشود مثلا اگر قرار است با عمان سر تعیین آبراه مذاکره کنیم باید بدانیم حتما آمریکا خواهد کوشید همین مذاکره را به اهرمی برای کاهش نرخ نفت تبدیل کند و یا وقتی میدانیم …
حالا همین #ناصر_هادیان که دیشب حرفهای مذبذبانهاش در برنامه #به_وقت_ایران صدای خیلیها را درآورد، یک سر و گردن از ظریف، بالاتره! هادیان در سال ۹۴ گفته بود اگر جای ظریف بودم برجام را امضا نمیکردم چون گام به گام و متوازن نیست و تحریمها را رفع نمیکند، حالا ببین خود ظریف چقدر داغانه! سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
👍1
یا پزشکیان! یا قالیباف! رسول خدا(ص): یا علی! حتما با #ترسو مشورت مکن که راه نجات را برایت تنگ میکند و با بخیل مشورت مکن که تو را از مقصد باز میدارد و با حریص مشورت مکن که شر را در نظرت زینت میدهد. یاعلی! بدان که ترس و بخل و حرص از یک سرشتند و منشا آنها بدگمانی به خدا است. الخصال سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
👍1
ناصر هادیان استاد روابط بینالملل است اما خیال میکند صرف توافق و بعد هم عقل داشتن برای حفظ آن به هر قیمت و حتی یکسویه، باعث پیشرفت است! بازدارندگی امنیتی، خروج از چرخه جنگ، آتشبس و مذاکره، سوابق تاریخی مکرر و الزام دشمن به اجرای تعهداتش هم که کشک! همینقدر سطحینگر و عبرتناپذیر! سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
درباره اهمیت #خطای_محاسباتی و اختلال در نظام تصمیمگیری کشور در سطوح مختلف اعم از مسئولان، مردم و خواص و آثار آن در ابعاد مختلف اداره کشور خصوصا در ایجاد خطای محاسباتی در نظام تصمیمگیری دشمن و هزینههای اصلاح خطاهای محاسباتی دشمن. سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
👍1
در فیلم انتخاباتی ازش میپرسد اگر سنگاندازیها نگذاشت به وعدههایت عمل کنی چه! و او میگوید وقتم را تلف نمیکنم و استعفا میدهم! یعنی از اول فرضش این است که اگر نشد، لابد نگذاشتهاند و نه که نتوانسته باشم فلذا نمیگوید با عذرخواهی، استعفا میدهم؛ پس استفاده ابزاری از #استعفا از اول هم در برنامه بود. سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
پس از سخنان افشاگرانه #باقر_خرازی درباره #استعفای_پزشکیان ، پزشکیان گفت استعفا نخواهم داد و اگر استعفا بدهم اعلام خواهم کرد و نگفت تا حالا استعفا ندادهام! او گفت اگر بخواهم استعفا دهم رسما اعلام میکنم و این یعنی استعفا با اعمال هزینه! احتمالا یعنی نمیگوید چون بلد نبودم، میگوید چون نگذاشتند! سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
جنس تاییدات رهبری از مسئولان و مطالبهشان از مردم چیست؟ سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
جنگطلب اصلی خود شمایید که نه فقط خودتان خطای محاسباتی دارید، بلکه با ترس و لرزتان، آن خطا را به دشمن احمق و جسور هم منتقل میکنید و او وقتی ایران را ضعیف و ایرانیان را ترسو برآورد کرد، تحریک میشود تا مرتکب غلط عملی شود و بعد کشورِ درگیرِ جنگ، باید کلی هزینه دهد تا خطای فکری و عملی دشمن را اصلاح کند. https://virasty.com/nazokbin/1785745189334810476 سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
صبحی که از شهادت رهبری مطلع شدیم با اشک روان و مشت گرهکرده رفتیم میدان شهر! بعد هم تا معرفی رهبری در میدان ماندیم و بعد از آن هم به حکم رهبر رشید، میدان را رها نکردیم؛ حالا شما اگر فکر میکنی تدبیر شما ما رو مبعوث کرده مختاری، فقط نگید از میدانی که ما بنا گذاشتیم بهمون نقد نکنید! #قالیباف سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
#تهدید_زیرساخت معتبر شود باجخواهی آمریکا با این چماق، حدیقف نخواهد داشت. چاره صرفا تهدید معتبر و دردناک متقابل است: ۱- برای متحدان آمریکا تهدید نابودی زیرساخت کل منطقه ۲- برای آمریکا هم تهدید بردن نرخ نفت به اوج با منع تولید و فروش نفت منطقه؛ چارهای که تاکنون چندبار جواب داده و بازهم خواهد داد. سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
پروژه آمریکایی #نرمالایز معرف حضورتون هست دیگه!؟ سیاوش آقاجانی @nazokbin
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nazokbin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 899,768 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نازکبین | آقاجانی” (@nazokbin), 418 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nazokbin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.