Channel
@nazeraramesh12
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,872subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001199992518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nazeraramesh12 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nazeraramesh12 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 1,872 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 1,868 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 1,863 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 1,862 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 September 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,860 |
| Reactions total | 143 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,153 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,032 | 89.5% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 4.25% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 3.73% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 1.30% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 0.607% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.52% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.087% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 September 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پذیرش دریافت این نکته است که آنچه شمایید پیشاپیش به این لحظه بله گفته است پذیرش چیزی نیست که شما قبول کنید آن توسط زندگی انجام میشود. #کتاب_عمیقترین_پذیرش #جف_فوستر #خوانش_حانیه_معزی @sofiasananda @nazeraramesh10
❤36🔥2🎉1
. به یاد فرشتگانی که حضورشان هنوز در این خاک نفس میکشد آنهایی که تنها درس امید و زندگی را دادند درس زیبایی و شهامت را دادند و هرگز فراموش نخواهند شد. نورِ آرامش و صبر و امید بر خانواده های سوگوار بِبارد🦋 @sofiasananda
❤65🔥9😢6
🌿 کتابهای صوتی و pdf🌿 1.کتاب تائوت چینگ اثر لائوتزه 2.کتاب از اشتیاق تا انجام 3.هر قدم با عشق 4.دروازه های معبد درون 5. کتاب دو نیرو 6.کتاب به چیزی دست نزن 🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻 🌿فایلهای صوتی بر اساس موضوع🌿 1.فایلهای مراقبه 2.سوالها و جوابها 3.در مورد احساسات، ، عادتها و جعبه های تمنای ذهن 4.معنویت چیست؟ 5.پرسش و پاسخ کلاسها 6. تسلیم، میانه روی و پذیرش 7.بیداری و رسیدن به آگاهی 8.سکوت و شخص 9.درباره ی مراقبه…
❤24
در این ایام... نور وجودتان را فراگیر کنید با قدرت شکست ناپذیر عشق و شفقت با اشک با غم اما عشق را بیاورید عشق پر فروغ تر از هر نوریست و قدرتمندتر از هر چیزی من به عشق ایمان دارم. #حانیه @sofiasananda...
❤91
اگر اینان مسلمانند یا رب کافرم گردان وگر من کافرم از مسلک اینان برم گردان
❤85👍20🔥3👎1
از جهنم تا بهشت – تغییرات فرکانسی ایران بهشت و جهنم جای دوری نیستند؛ بهشت و جهنم درون انساناند. جهنم یعنی ترس، خشم و اضطراب. بهشت یعنی عشق، آرامش و حضور. هر انسانی هر لحظه با یک فکر، یک حس و یک انتخاب، وارد یکی از این دو جهان میشود.
❤76🔥7👍1
پیام های زیادی از خانم ها به دستم میرسد که میگویند کسی که با او در ارتباطیم به دلیل آنکه آگاه شده و روشن ضمیر و یا استاد... فردی ست که در روابط میگوید انتظاری نداشته باش بیا همه چیز را بپذیر ... با هر رفتاری، هیچ گونه انتظاری از من نداشته باش! یا آنکه بی ثبات است و این بی ثباتی را به اسم آگاهی گذاشته است و.... عزیزان لازم بود بگویم این رفتارها ناشی از عدم بلوغ عاطفی ست و نه آگاه بودن یا روشن ضمیر بودن! تا زمانی که …
❤58
روابط _تیک نات هان
❤6
هر چه میگذرد... و هر چه پیش میروید... و تجربه کسب میکنید... در رسیدن به خواسته ها یا نرسیدن به آنها... تنها به یک چیز عمیق و زنده میرسید. اینکه، تنها چیزی که واقعا اهمیت دارد تنها خودِ خودِ "زندگی" است نفس کشیدن است بودن است حس کردن است و دیدن... چنان که گویی مسافری و هر لحظه را چنان ببینی که ندانی فردا باز هم این درخت را خواهی دید یا نه... تنها "وجود زندگی ست" که به راستی مهم است چه آرزوهای درخشانی که با رسیدن به آن…
❤68👍8🔥2😢1
جایی در وجودم، فراریست از تعلق چرا که تعلق یک حدود است "آزادی" زیباترین و درخشان ترین معنای من است آزادی، پرواز روح هست به خانه... _حانیه @sofiasananda
❤63🤩3🎉1
میخواهم بگویم که... تمامش را به او بده همین الان! بگو که تمام نگرانی ها نمیدانم ها احساساتت کارت آینده ات، گذشته ات آرزوهایت برنامه ها و رویاهایت... هر چه هست را به تو میدهم. کنار بکش زندگی ات را به او بده تنها اوست که هست او میداند با زندگی تو چه کند اما تو نمیدانی او برنامه هایی دارد که همیشه مخالف خواسته های توست این بار سنگین را زمین بگذار تو نمیتوانی تمام اینهارا به دوش بکشی البته که باید به دوش بکشی! تا متوجه ش…
❤89👍10🔥7🎉1
چرا نظم آرامبخش است؟ چرا در هر حیطه ای نظم اصلِ راه و الزام است؟ از نظر من، نظم نزدیک ترین چیز به حقیقت وجودی ما است. همانطور که کریشنا مورتی می گوید: (جایی که خیر است، نظم است، نه نظم ایجاد شده از سوی یک مرجع قدرت که یا در آن ترس از توبیخ وجود دارد یا شوق پاداش. نظم همان خیر است همان ثبات است قانون خیر، ابدی، جاودانه و بی زوال است. ) نظم خیلی چیزها را در برمیگیرد چقدر به زمان خودمان و دیگری اهمیت میدهیم؟ چقدر برای …
❤52👍6🎉3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nazeraramesh12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,197,275 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سوفیا ساناندا” (@nazeraramesh12), 1,872 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nazeraramesh12.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.