Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for نَوایِ‌آبی

Channel

نَوایِ‌آبی

@navaye_abi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

84,198subscribers

+49,892 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003504837340
TypeChannel
Username@navaye_abi
Descriptionاینجا جایی واسه همه سلیقه هاست:) 🔹OFFICIAL CHANNEL NAVAYE ABI🔹 چنل فیلممون : 🎬 @namaye_abi تبلیغات : @abi_tablighat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/navaye_abi

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,30684,19859,2528 August 2026 — 34,306 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,496 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,236 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,763 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,213 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,677 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,677 subscribers13 August 2026 — 38,616 subscribers15 August 2026 — 49,095 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50,862 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,688 subscribers18 August 2026 — 52,847 subscribers19 August 2026 — 53,760 subscribers20 August 2026 — 54,687 subscribers22 August 2026 — 56,772 subscribers23 August 2026 — 60,351 subscribers25 August 2026 — 61,744 subscribers26 August 2026 — 64,791 subscribers27 August 2026 — 65,631 subscribers28 August 2026 — 66,458 subscribers29 August 2026 — 67,106 subscribers30 August 2026 — 67,560 subscribers31 August 2026 — 68,046 subscribers1 September 2026 — 68,324 subscribers2 September 2026 — 68,833 subscribers3 September 2026 — 70,794 subscribers5 September 2026 — 74,445 subscribers8 September 2026 — 77,267 subscribers11 September 2026 — 78,784 subscribers13 September 2026 — 80,873 subscribers14 September 2026 — 81,332 subscribers16 September 2026 — 82,374 subscribers19 September 2026 — 84,198 subscribers8 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +49,892. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,822–91,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:1884,198+1,824
16 Sept 2026, 17:2182,374+1,042
14 Sept 2026, 20:0181,332+459
13 Sept 2026, 06:1680,873+2,089
11 Sept 2026, 08:4078,784+1,517
8 Sept 2026, 16:3877,267+2,822
5 Sept 2026, 09:3874,445+3,651
3 Sept 2026, 10:4470,794+1,961
2 Sept 2026, 04:2668,833+509
1 Sept 2026, 04:1768,324+278
31 Aug 2026, 06:2368,046+486
30 Aug 2026, 05:2667,560+454
29 Aug 2026, 08:1267,106+648
28 Aug 2026, 09:1266,458+827
27 Aug 2026, 06:0565,631+840
26 Aug 2026, 06:0364,791+3,047
25 Aug 2026, 03:1661,744+1,393
23 Aug 2026, 22:0460,351+3,579
22 Aug 2026, 08:5456,772+2,085
20 Aug 2026, 22:1354,687first reading

Engagement

558 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.48%
avg views ÷ 84,198 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,980
331 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.495%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
338
of 558 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 329 of 331 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held558 (11 August 202623 September 2026)
Views total2,640,984
Reactions total12,994
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 16:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
319
Videos
25
Links
25

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,615 reactions across 538 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10,93955.8%
💔1,6788.55%
❤‍🔥1,6318.32%
😍1,2686.46%
💯9034.60%
🗿5792.95%
🔥5492.80%
🌚4012.04%
💅2941.50%
🍓2791.42%
🆒2501.27%
😎2131.09%
💘1510.77%
💋1310.668%
👍1200.612%
👎650.331%
630.321%
🎉510.26%
🦄400.204%
🐳80.041%
1 further kind20.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 539 of the 558 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,615 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 558 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
59
across the posts below
Posts paid on
31
of 544 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @navaye_abi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 558 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 15:57 UTC950 views5 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

یه ربع عربی ، بندری بزنیم برقصیم😍😂

5

23 Sept 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,040 views6 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

انقد اخلاقم بده که حداقل خیالم راحته هرکی کنارم مونده واقعا دوستم داره🤗

💅6

23 Sept 2026, 13:57 UTC≈2,100 views0 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

20 دقیقه بزن بکوب ، بریم بترکونیم😂🔥

23 Sept 2026, 13:53 UTC≈2,070 views6 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

بگو بهشت چیه؟ مگه به جز اینه که با تو باشم؟

6

23 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC≈3,180 views8 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

موزیک جدید آرمین 2AFM >>> - من دلم تنگته):

8

23 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC≈3,210 views20 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

مردی رو انتخاب کنین که لازم نباشه بهش توضیح بدین یه مرد چطوری رفتار میکنه.

16💘2💯2

23 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC≈3,800 views13 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

خدا قسمت کنه این دافه واسم جورشه🙂‍↔️😂

11🔥2

23 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC≈3,880 views21 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

با كسى بريد تو رابطه كه معتقده هميشه همچیو ميشه درست كرد و وسط راه ولتون نكنه..🤍

21

22 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC≈5,420 views6 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

◻️ من با استفاده از این ربات تونستم بفهمم کیا پروفایلم رو ذخیره و بازدید میکنن 👇🏻 هرکس عکس پروفایلتو چک کرد ، این ربات خبردارت میکنه و میگه کی بوده! @KiProfileBot @KiProfileBot @KiProfileBot

6

22 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC≈5,280 views8 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

قول میدم این آهنگ عربی قفلیت بشه نمی‌تونی ترکش کنی🥹😍 #کد_177

8

22 Sept 2026, 19:29 UTC≈5,360 views18 reactionsread 23 September 2026

ریمیکس های امروز و گوش دادی؟🙂‍↔️

17💔1

22 Sept 2026, 15:14 UTC≈6,260 views21 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Voice message

ریمیکسی که یه شبه کل اینستارو ترکوند،پلی کن خیابون منتظر همین ریمیکسه😈💣

18🔥2😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 558 posts we hold for @navaye_abi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@navaye_abi edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTCAnonymous Poll1,020 voters approx.

آقا یه سوال موزیک شاد و قری بیشتر بزارم یا همه چی ترکیبی غمگین و آروم و..؟

  1. شاد و قری68%
  2. ترکیبی(غمگین ، آروم ، میکس ، رپی )28%
  3. آخه من چکاره ام🦦15%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 558 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“نَوایِ‌آبی” (@navaye_abi), 84,198 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/navaye_abi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.