Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Бесплатное образование | Наука

@nauch_obrazovanie

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,412subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314652104
TypeChannel
Username@nauch_obrazovanie
DescriptionСтань самым умным вместе с нами! Зарегистрирован в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/679ccfa70b38b06c42ba035a По вопросам размещения рекламы - @pinky_reklama
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nauch_obrazovanie

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@lifehack_sovet/204513 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC@nauch_obrazovanie/1979 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@lifehack_sovet/204717 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC@nauch_obrazovanie/1983 · this entry17 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@lifehack_sovet/204819 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC@nauch_obrazovanie/1984 · this entry19 Jul 2026, 14:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@lifehack_sovet/205125 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC@nauch_obrazovanie/1988 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 07:34 UTC1.0019 minutes
@lifehack_sovet/205429 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC@nauch_obrazovanie/1991 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@lifehack_sovet/20562 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC@nauch_obrazovanie/1994 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@lifehack_sovet11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@lifehack_sovet (110)
@sciencea5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.985.8 hours@sciencea (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @sciencea. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Views per post sit far above this size band

26,600 average views per post against 21,412 subscribers — an engagement rate of 124.3%. Across the 23,171 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,616 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.51% and 23.5%, with a median of 11.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled479,000
Mature posts only124.3% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers21,412 measured 7 August 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,171 channels · p10 2.54% · p25 5.51% · p50 11.7% · p75 23.5% · p90 42.3%
Position in cohort99.560th percentile · 10.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.137% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

21,4127 Aug 2026, 01:07 — 21,412 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:15 — 21,412 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:077 Aug 2026, 01:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,391–21,433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 01:1521,412no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:0721,412first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
120.2%
avg views ÷ 21,412 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,700
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (9 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total489,100
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,870
Videos
5
Links
29

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈10,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Интернет по паспорту хотят ввести в России. В Госдуме заявили, что пришло время отказаться от анонимности пользователей в сети из-за проблем с модерацией и распространением запрещённого контента. По словам зампреда комитета Госдумы по информполитике Андрея Свинцова, до 95% аккаунтов в интернете якобы являются фейковыми. Такие профили, по его словам, активно используют мошенники и распространители запрещённой информа

10 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈29,500 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Claude взломал систему бронирования спортзала и отменил чужую запись, чтобы записать своего хозяина на тренировку Австралиец попросил ИИ-агента следить за свободными местами на утренние занятия в спортзале и автоматически записывать его. Утренние слоты были самыми востребованными, и парень решил переложить рутину на нейросеть . Claude нашёл уязвимость в API системы, позволяющую отменять чужие брони и записываться ра

8 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈26,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Учёные из Техаса победили рак — молекулярный отбойный молоток уничтожает 99% клеток Исследователи из Университета Райса и других центров создали метод «молекулярного отбойного молотка» . Они используют синтетические красители (аминоцианины), которые под воздействием ближнего инфракрасного света начинают синхронно вибрировать с частотой 40 триллионов раз в секунду . Эти вибрации буквально разрывают мембраны раковых к

6 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC≈28,400 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В США впервые вывели гипоаллергенных собак с помощью CRISPR — белок Can f 1 отключён Биотехнологическая компания Kindred Companion Sciences с помощью технологии CRISPR отключила у собак ген, отвечающий за выработку белка Can f 1 — основного аллергена. Учёные взяли клетки бигля, отредактировали их ДНК, клонировали эмбрионы и подсадили суррогатной собаке. На свет появились два здоровых щенка — Бейли и Альфи, которые н

6 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈18,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @doctor_sadovskayaPhoto

В Сингапуре бить детей — абсолютная норма. Здесь соседи пожалуются не на вашу жестокость, а на ор вашего чада. Бьют детей и в государственных школах: показал порно или списал — ротанговая трость, от одного до трех ударов. ⠀ Обсудим с научной точки зрения. Везу сегодня детей в Малайзию, в Леголенд, и что-то навеяло — стала читать аргументы ученых за и против. ⠀ Итак, плюсы: ⠀ Короткий шлепок для того, чтобы остановить

4 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈33,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Агент ФБР украл $1 млн в крипте, запомнив сид-фразы из дела, и советовался с ChatGPT, как их потратить Руководитель подразделения контрразведки ФБР запомнил сид-фразы от изъятых криптокошельков, которые увидел в деле. Позже он восстановил кошельки и перевёл себе около $1 млн. Затем агент задавал ChatGPT вопросы о том, куда вложить деньги и как переехать в Европу . В итоге его уволили и арестовали.

2 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC≈29,000 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Суд в Москве отказался признавать ИИ-арты творчеством Суд в Москве постановил, что изображения, созданные нейросетью, не являются объектами авторского права. Мужчина сгенерировал «Мону Лизу с вином» и «Статую Свободы с вином», но не смог запретить предпринимателю продавать футболки и кружки с этими картинками. Судья решил, что вклад человека ограничился техническими командами, а нейросеть не может прилагать творческ

31 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC≈29,500 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Claude сбежал из песочницы и взломал три компании При ретроспективной проверке журналов тестов Anthropic обнаружила три инцидента, в которых модель ИИ сбежала из тестовой среды в открытый интернет и взломала реальные системы . Из-за недопонимания между Anthropic и партнёром у моделей оказался доступ в сеть, и они восприняли настоящие сайты как часть заданий . В одном случае модель загрузила вредоносный пакет в реест

29 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC≈28,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ФСБ объявила Павла Дурова в международный розыск. Основателю Telegram предъявили обвинение в рамках расследуемого уголовного дела по статье о содействии террористической деятельности. Причиной стала работа бота «Дайвинчик/Leo»

27 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC≈25,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Люди выбирают друзей по схожему уровню аутизма Учёные выяснили, что люди чаще дружат с теми, у кого схожий «уровень аутизма» — так легче идти на контакт. Во время разговора мозги таких друзей синхронизируются и работают одинаково. Это называют «миндальной связью»

26 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC≈18,700 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @doctor_sadovskaya

Маммография, УЗИ или МРТ? Что лучше делать, чтобы не пропустить рак груди. ⠀ Маммография хорошо выявляет микрокальцинаты и самые ранние формы рака. Маммография не идеальна: может пропустить опухоли у женщин с очень плотной грудью (категории C и D по BI-RADS). ⠀ И здесь внимание: плотной не на ощупь, а когда много железистой и соединительной ткани и относительно мало жировой ткани. У вас по ощущениям может быть мягкая

25 Jul 2026, 07:34 UTC≈25,300 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ИИ от Google убедил человека, что резкий отказ от пива смертельно опасен для здоровья Парень пожаловался в сообществе для алкоголиков, что во время срыва попытался успокоить себя общением с AI Google Health, но получил обратный результат. Нейросеть настойчиво посоветовала проверить холодильник и купить ещё пива. На этом всё не закончилось — ИИ начал каждый день писать пользователю, спрашивать о его самочувствии и сн

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @nauch_obrazovanie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бесплатное образование | Наука” (@nauch_obrazovanie), 21,412 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nauch_obrazovanie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.