Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Naturally Artificial by Sergey Osipov

Channel

Naturally Artificial by Sergey Osipov

@naturally_artificial

Not marked by Telegram, checked 10 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,169subscribers

+91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002130664986
TypeChannel
Username@naturally_artificial
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/naturally_artificial

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,0217,1697,0957 August 2026 — 7,078 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,079 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,102 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,108 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,098 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,093 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,077 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,044 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,027 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,021 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,032 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,088 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,169 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 50 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,999–7,191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 22:377,169+81
15 Sept 2026, 15:417,088+56
11 Sept 2026, 17:577,032+11
7 Sept 2026, 09:147,021-6
2 Sept 2026, 09:447,027-17
29 Aug 2026, 22:557,044-33
26 Aug 2026, 16:527,077-16
23 Aug 2026, 12:127,093-5
17 Aug 2026, 12:127,098-10
14 Aug 2026, 03:477,108+6
10 Aug 2026, 14:367,102+23
7 Aug 2026, 14:417,079+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:467,078first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 52s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

602 reactions across 25 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12520.8%
👍9015.0%
😁7712.8%
🔥579.47%
🤣325.32%
🫡243.99%
🍌233.82%
🍓223.65%
👌172.82%
💯162.66%
👾132.16%
✍111.83%
😎91.50%
😨91.50%
⚡81.33%
custom 537299387386377698471.16%
custom 547214646236204881871.16%
❤‍🔥71.16%
🙈60.997%
🦄60.997%
16 further kinds365.98%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 602 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC264 views17 reactionsread 20 August 2026

EU fined X €120M for not being transparent enough. Musk's answer: okey, you want transparency, take all of it! He put X's actual algorithm on GitHub. The real filtering code. Exactly where X limits accounts on government request. Brazil's first up. There's an election filter that pulls ~600 accounts out of For You feed Governments used to fuck us quietly. Now we see who is a real motherfucker. Well played, Elon! #…

😎6😁4🔥3🤝2⚡1❤1

17 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC559 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

This is an iconic photo. “The early days of Amazon”. Bezos sits at the desk made from a door. Startup life as it is But what I just found. It’s 1999. Not the beginning (IPO was in 1997). Valuation ~$25bn. The man at the desk is worth at least $5bn And the office still looks like that! Most founders close a round and upgrade the furniture first #Startup #Founder #Amazon #Bezos #BuildInPublic

👍10❤4😁3👌2

14 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC870 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026

You know, what was the weirdest question that investors asked me? — Sergey, will you take my daughter to work for your startup? Founders, what was the strangest question investors asked you?

😁9👍2custom 53729938738637769842💅1💘1

13 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC975 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

A space for honest conversations about business and investment. And no agenda. That's the point Yellow Rocks runs Open Space in Barcelona. Participants build the program on the spot. Whatever you walked in with—scaling, fundraising, AI, a new market, a team that isn't working—that becomes the agenda • real cases, with real numbers, from the people who own them • the decisions nobody wants to make alone • feedback f…

👌6❤4✍2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,320 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026

— Sergey, I bought bitcoin in 2023 at $22K! — Wow! How much? — 0.0001 BTC

🤣11👍3🤡3😎2

5 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,760 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

AI is an excuse to fire people in gaming. Not about productivity. Studios over-hired during COVID. GameDev boomed. Boom ended. Investments stopped. Two years of painful realignment. Bloodbath. Companies now cite AI in 22% of all 2026 layoffs. In gaming it's the perfect cover story AI gives worse assets. Can't improve the creative core. Players hate it! — Why is the quality so bad? — Because AI is making your logo no…

👍13❤6⚡2👾2💯2🤯1

5 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC≈1,470 views18 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

September 10–13, Limassol. R-Founders is running a four-day camp for founders and C-level people building for global markets. The business program sits inside a trip around the island What's on: • Panel — where founders are putting money over the next 2–3 years. Open Q&A • Business cases from the inside. Real numbers, real decisions, the mistakes that never make it to a slide • Team Challenge. Teams take apart someo…

🔥11✍3❤2👌1👍1

1 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,320 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Spent the week fighting Eleven Labs, Veed, and Descript, trying to dub my Naturally Artificial films. None of the platforms made me happy Looking for a freelancer who can do this for me on a regular basis The ask: dubbing EN→RU and RU→EN for our episodes (example), delivered as separate audio tracks I can upload myself. YouTube's auto-dub is free but shitty. I want one clean voice per speaker, consistent across a f…

❤7🫡4🗿3👌2

27 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,540 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Every Mediterranean company I've seen is adding AI. None are cutting headcount. None are fixing the logic, the org, the docs flows. Just more cost and IT complexity. But AI-for-the-sake-of-AI accelerates the damage! What changes it: a champion inside the company. Someone who rethinks the org from scratch. What AI can replace, what it can't, what should stop existing entirely etc. Takes it to the board. Sells it to t…

❤8👍3💯3🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 13:27 UTC≈1,700 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Writers complain that AI kills their creativity. Seriously? Bad ideas written by hand are still bad ideas. Good ideas written with AI are still good ideas. Nope? And by the way, folks, we all must stop playing AI police, chasing that dashes etc. Nobody asks if Hemingway used a typewriter or a pencil 🍓Agree 🍌Disagree, I don’t want writers to use AI

🍓20🍌12👍3😁3❤1👎1

17 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,930 views44 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

6 months ago Nadia (producer) and I (host) started filming founders and investors for Naturally Artificial on YouTube. 7 films. 100 shorts. Outcome: • 3.7M views • 17K likes • 24K subscribers • €5K earned • €20K spent Bonus: +3K followers on my LinkedIn and Instagram Not a unicorn scale, but I really enjoy this pet project. It gives me a direct link to great founders' minds. Kind of live MBA: which niches are invest…

🔥17❤9👍8🦄4😁3💯2👏1

15 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC≈1,550 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Crypto is at the bottom now. Capital moves to AI. Investors, devs, analysts convinced it's over. Most L1 tokens are dying. Bitcoin and Ethereum haven't hit the floor yet. Funeral? Wrong reaction 3 areas are growing: • Stablecoins. Already processing huge transaction volumes, still treated as a niche instrument • Tokenization. We're at the very start of a long trend. Most real-world assets will end up trading on-chai…

💯9👍4custom 54721464623620488183✍2❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @naturally_artificial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🤖 OpenAI | ChatGPT | GPT-4o | GPT-4👨🏻‍💻
@gpt_anthropic · 24,950
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Ai Motion News • AI & Neural Networks
@AiMotionNews · 29,581
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Hi, AI • Tech News
@hiaimediaen · 564,679
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Naturally Artificial by Sergey Osipov” (@naturally_artificial), 7,169 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naturally_artificial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.