Channel
@naturalbeads0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
499subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002020796757 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @naturalbeads0 |
| Created | 4 November 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/naturalbeads0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 499 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 505 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 508 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 508 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 22 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
882 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5219841155474151304 | 230 | 26.1% | |
| custom 5240499415591960044 | 117 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5454094830781084838 | 104 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5330164502937741842 | 88 | 9.98% | |
| custom 5353027034761146664 | 82 | 9.30% | |
| custom 5283106242787563197 | 81 | 9.18% | |
| custom 5388990221859698562 | 49 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5451868031972031161 | 47 | 5.33% | |
| custom 5318911263420468751 | 45 | 5.10% | |
| custom 5197321581084292061 | 39 | 4.42% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 882 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2024 to 12 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Слушаю! Прошу отвечать честно, так как мне важно понимать, нужно ли развивать это направление или нет
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 521984115547415130413
Signed Лероя Маяковская
Очень много людей откликнулось! Я с большом восторге, ещё раз повторюсь, что это дело невероятно благородное На сегодняшний день новых запросов на данные браслетики я принимать не буду, так как первый раз имею дело с такими объемными заказами от приличного количества незнакомых людей, а это все-таки большая ответственность! Но не стану вас разочаровывать! Если спрос на этот товар остается, то я буду время от времен…
custom 521984115547415130422
Signed Лероя Маяковская
Товарищи, друзья, здравствуйте! Откликнитесь на данный пост, если бы хотели стать обладателем личного экзотического животного и красивейшего браслета, который напоминает вам, что вы стали опекуном. Такую приятную и интересную инициативу проводит благотворительная организация fahlo (https://myfahlo.com/). Деньги, которые отправляются им в фонд используются для поддержки существования вашего нового питомца, который на…
custom 521984115547415130425
Signed Лероя Маяковская
Подарите реакций на постики выше в честь нового года, любимые 😊
custom 521984115547415130475
Signed Лероя Маяковская
🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🫶Помните про браслетики, которые я сделала для тайного санты? 🫶Одна из девушек вчера уже получила свой подарок, поэтому теперь я могу наконец-то показать его вам! 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍
custom 521984115547415130495
Signed Лероя Маяковская
Вы думали, что админ умер? 🖖 🤩 А вот и нет, готовлюсь к противным экзаменам и изредка беру что-то на простые заказы 🤩 Делюсь с вами персонализированным подарочным набором для прекрасной девушки 🎲 Чуть позже покажу два нежных браслета, которые подготовила для подарков на Тайного Санту, пока что получатели их не видели, так что обойдемся без спойлеров для них 🎲
custom 533016450293774184288
Signed Лероя Маяковская
Какой браслет запомнился больше всего?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 524049941559196004433custom 53889902218596985626
Signed Лероя Ситникова
💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐 🤲Серию этих подарочных браслетиков завершает прекрасное изделие для Юли 🤲Над созданием этого украшения я просидела дольше всего, беспокоясь за то, что не попаду в образ получателя. Неожиданно для меня самой вышло такое красивое сочетание цветов 📿 Реакцию можно посмотреть в комментариях 📿 💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐
custom 524049941559196004484custom 538899022185969856243
Signed Лероя Ситникова
🌝 🌝 🌝 🌝 🌝 🌝 🤩 Демонстрирую вам третий браслет из серии подарков вожатым для Артема 🤩 Безмерно люблю работать в таком стиле, поэтому это изделие мне особенно запомнилось и понравилось. Надеюсь, что и у вас оно вызовет такие же положительные эмоции 🤩 Реакция на подарок в комментариях 🤩 🌝 🌝 🌝 🌝 🌝 🌝
custom 528310624278756319781custom 531891126342046875145
Signed Лероя Ситникова
⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ 🫂Брутальный и дерзкий браслет для самого лучшего стажера по имени Андрей Изделие продолжает мой небольшой парад экспериментов в стилях и тематиках. Дам вам спойлер: в целом, 3 из 4х работ для этой «коллекции» совершенно не похожи на те, что я уже создавала. Так что смотрите, как я, оказывается, могу! 😎 🖤Реакция на подарок, как всегда, в комментариях🖤 ⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️
custom 535302703476114666482custom 545186803197203116147
Signed Лероя Ситникова
🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 Первый экземпляр! 🎟 Игривый филлипинский браслет для вожатого по имени Зелим 🌟Очень экспериментальный опыт для меня, ранее ничего подобного не выполняла, но личность получателя подарка заставила меня покреативить в новую сторону 🌟В комплекте шел ферби (big price), так как человек очень его напоминает и мы общались на тему этих легендарных игрушек 🥐 Реакция на изделие в комментариях 🥐 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟
custom 5454094830781084838104custom 519732158108429206139
Signed Лероя Ситникова
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @naturalbeads0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Слушаю! Прошу отвечать честно, так как мне важно понимать, нужно ли развивать это направление или нет
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой браслет запомнился больше всего?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2024 to 12 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 870,911 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Natural Beads 🧺” (@naturalbeads0), 499 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naturalbeads0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.