Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 37 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,628–3,653 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 18:58
3,645
+1
8 Sept 2026, 11:38
3,644
-4
2 Sept 2026, 19:42
3,648
-2
30 Aug 2026, 13:35
3,650
+2
27 Aug 2026, 17:03
3,648
+1
25 Aug 2026, 02:22
3,647
+4
21 Aug 2026, 12:18
3,643
+1
18 Aug 2026, 18:16
3,642
-4
16 Aug 2026, 02:18
3,646
-1
12 Aug 2026, 14:33
3,647
+6
9 Aug 2026, 17:41
3,641
+10
6 Aug 2026, 10:49
3,631
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:59
3,631
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
882 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
434
49.2%
❤
252
28.6%
🙏
108
12.2%
💯
54
6.12%
👏
18
2.04%
🥰
8
0.907%
🤯
3
0.34%
🤔
2
0.227%
❤🔥
1
0.113%
👀
1
0.113%
🔥
1
0.113%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 882 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2023 to 28 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ihr lieben Menschen in diesem Kanal,
zunächst einmal, möchte ich jedem einzelnen von Euch danken. Danke dafür, dass ihr mir die Treue haltet, auch wenn es gerade sehr ruhig hier ist. 🙏
Ich möchte Euch gern mitteilen, warum es so ruhig ist.
Ich hatte mir für dieses Jahr vorgenommen, mich viel praktischer mit einem Thema zu beschäftigen, über das ich theoretisch einiges weiß:
Die gewachsene Heilkraft in Form von Wi…
Spikeopathie -
Und wie man die Spike-Proteine wieder los wird
Bekanntermaßen ist das Spike-Protein, welches durch die mRNA-Impfung gegen Covid vom Körper selbst produziert wird, in der Lage dazu, eine Vielzahl von Erkrankungen auszulösen oder zu begünstigen, z. B. Krebs, Autoimmunerkrankungen, Bluthochdruck, Thrombosen, Diabetes, Erkrankungen des Nervensystems usw.
Um die Zusammenhänge verdeutlichen zu können, scha…
Anmerkung zum obigen 👆Beitrag:
Bei regelmäßiger Einnahme von Vitamin D als Nahrungsergänzung, ist die zusätzliche Einnahme von 100 Mikrogramm (mcg) Vitamin K2 ratsam. Bei einer Zufuhr von 5.000 IE Vitamin D und mehr pro Tag empfehlen sich 200 mcg Vitamin K2 täglich.
Vitamin D - Natürliches Schutzschild gegen Krebs
In dieser Studie wurde untersucht, wie sich die Einnahme von Vitamin D auf die Sterblichkeit bei Krebs auswirkt. Im Ergebnis stellte sich heraus, dass die Wahrscheinlichkeit, an einer Krebserkrankung zu versterben, bei täglicher Einnahme von Vitamin D signifikant sinkt. Es konnte keine Aussage darüber getroffen werden, wie der Vitamin D-Spiegel der Probanden vor Begi…
An dieser Stelle, geht es nicht um das Ergebnis als solches, sondern darum, wie das Ergebnis von Seiten des Labors interpretiert bzw. bewertet wird.
Hatte man Anfang 2022 einen Vitamin D-Wert von 41 - 90 ng/ml, war man gut bis sehr gut mit Vitamin D versorgt. Anfang 2024 droht bei einem Wert von > 50 ng/ml bereits eine mögliche Überversorgung.
Wenn wir nun von dem Ergebnis in Bild 2 (24,93 ng/ml) ausgehen, so sollt…
Vitamin D - Verschiebung von Grenzwerten
An dem folgenden Beispiel wird wieder einmal deutlich, wie wichtig eigenverantwortliches Handeln und selbstständige Informationsbeschaffung sind.
Hat man Anfang des Jahres 2022 einen Bluttest zur Bestimmung des Vitamin D-Spiegels gemacht, sah das Ergebnis bzw. die Auswertung folgendermaßen aus 👇
Das Ergebnis der Umfrage überrascht mich leider nicht wirklich, dennoch ist es schockierend.
Stand jetzt haben 822 Menschen abgestimmt. Davon haben 640 Menschen mit "Ja" gestimmt und 182 mit "Nein".
Dieses Ergebnis nehme ich zum Anlass, den Themenkomplex Krebs nach und nach zu erweitern. Weil dieses Thema sehr umfangreich ist, wird es natürlich auch einige Zeit in Anspruch nehmen, dafür bitte ich um Euer Verständni…
Mir ist bewusst, dass die Beobachtung des eigenen Umfeldes keine wissenschaftlich fundierte Methode ist. Dennoch interessiert mich, ob es in Eurem direkten Umfeld, seit Beginn der Corona-Impfungen Ende 2020, Krebsneuerkrankungen bei Geimpften gibt.
Ja79%
Nein21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Themenkomplex Krebs
Krebs - Todesursache Nr. 2
Krebs - Todesursache Nr. 2
Krebs - Todesursache Nr. 2 (Fortsetzung)
Biopsien & das Risiko der Metastasierung
Die Chemotherapie
Schulmedizin vs. Alternative Medizin
Systematische Vergiftung als Auslöser von Krebs
Systematische Vergiftung durch vorsätzlichen Betrug
Olivenöl
Olivenöl - Fortsetzung
Naturheilsubstanzen gegen Krebs
Cannabinoide
Vitamin B 17
Vitamin B 17 (F…
👍17🙏3❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @natuerliche_heilung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Mir ist bewusst, dass die Beobachtung des eigenen Umfeldes keine wissenschaftlich fundierte Methode ist. Dennoch interessiert mich, ob es in Eurem direkten Umfeld, seit Beginn der Corona-Impfungen Ende 2020, Krebsneuerkrankungen bei Geimpften gibt.
Ja79%
Nein21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2023 to 28 August 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@natuerliche_heilung named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tgguerilla named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Natürliche Heilung” (@natuerliche_heilung), 3,645 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natuerliche_heilung.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.