Channel
@national_revolution
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
379subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001631522314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @national_revolution |
| Created | 24 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/national_revolution |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 379 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 376 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 380 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 380 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (29 December 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 53.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 26.7% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
One of the most revealing things about the modern left that we really should try to expose is the great effort in: 1. They put a great effort in signaling the super-wealthy, that is true, but always pinpointing that the most dangerous part is that they are males and white. 2. Meanwhile, when they are about to signal white males's supposed dominance in certain institutions, the wealth/class factor is always ignored —…
👏3👍1
The Cube's shape is also revealing, it represents the opposite of a perfect Sphere, rigid and claustrophobic. The Cube also is usually used to represent Saturn and Kronos, which is known for its domain over time, which is the main adversary of the survivors. At some point of the movie, the number 666 is also mentioned.
Worth's nihilistic explaination is accurate: We might want to blame someone and believe all evils are directed by a group of people, but the truth is there is no one in charge. However, despite having designed the outer shell, he fails to envision an exit.
Leaven, the intelligent technocrat, and Worth, the outer shell's designer and nihilist, both get really close to the exit but fail so. They represent higher stages of intelligence and understanding of the real world that allows them to move effectively through the Cube but not escaping it.
The Cube (1997) talks about the problems of lacking of a proper caste system during the Kali Yuga. Quentin, the cop, represents tyrannical (tyrannos) rule, appareantly effective but short-sighted. His rule is purely egotistic and violent, and while recognizing the different abilities of the group, it does so in a completely shallow way. The most complex rules of the game are only understood by the most socially ine…
« It is very good that there are yellow French, black French, brown French. They show that France is open to all races and has a universal vocation. But [it is good] on condition that they remain a small minority. Otherwise, France would no longer be France. We are still primarily a European people of the white race, Greek and Latin culture, and the Christian religion. » —Charles de Gaulle, 1959.
🤔1
National Revolution pinned «The term Woke has been mocked (and not necessarily without reason) as a simple conservative buzzword just like the left uses the word fascism. I think despite being able to point it out sometimes few dare to actually give some kind of definition that summarized…»
The most obvious part I have not spoke of here is that the idea of gender is strictly tied to sex if you actually want to have a term that is not circular. This is is merely an exercise of debunking them in their own terms.
Basically, they found out Native Americans: 1. Called gender-normative males A 2. Called gender-normative females B 3. Called gender-non-normative males and females C and D. So, because they can barely conceive cognition beyond language, they just assumed terms A, B, C and D were different genders. The thing is, ironically, that this is a form of linguistic colonialism, they were assuming they had the same linguist…
🤔2
One of the best examples of this is how the have made "common sense" the idea that native americans had "non-binary genders", but when you actually dive into this, the own native americans deny it, and the preciese epistemology of how they found about these supposed non-binary genders through their linguistic analysis is in direct contradiction to post-structuralism and anti-colonialism.
In the more material part we find mass importation of third-world immigrants (cheap labour, cheaper commodities; more workforce for the PMC, more demand for PMC members), welfare and aid programs (money has first to pass through them), cheaper services (e.g. UberEats), avoiding strikes, more tax revenues combined with more demand for public services (i.e. more demand for state officials), etc.
In the case of actual Neo-Orientalism (which is in my opinion often used wrongly about mere sentiments against Islam after 9/11, neo-liberal imperialism, or even plain old-school Orientalism) it is preciesely the instrumentalization of non-western cultures to imply that the natural human ethos coincides with the results of the deconstruction they are pushing: Gender fluidity, pseudo-matriarchy, hypersentimentalism, i…
🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @national_revolution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“National Revolution” (@national_revolution), 379 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/national_revolution.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.