Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for natana 🍀

Channel

natana 🍀

@natana_art

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

131subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001200352846
TypeChannel
Username@natana_art
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/natana_art

Growth

130131130.58 August 2026 — 130 subscribers9 August 2026 — 130 subscribers15 August 2026 — 131 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 130–131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 09:38131+1
9 Aug 2026, 01:16130no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:30130first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.5%
avg views ÷ 131 subscribers
Avg views / post
57.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held12 (7 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total228
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

208 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53619962707999560495526.4%
custom 58077343762801010015024.0%
custom 53596337767941520613215.4%
custom 58101825248186901262210.6%
custom 5809668357103816126199.13%
custom 5949591206127211790178.17%
custom 5936006864520089479104.81%
custom 594939994693855390631.44%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC36 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ребят, так как я очень медленный, всё равно заранее предупрежу ghostshelf.shop/merchants/... что через полтора-два месяца в призрачной полке планирую забрать всё и переоформить заново магазин и товары сделать новые, но прежних товаров, что вы тут видите, больше не будет. Сделаю скидки, так что сможете приобрести приятно штучки (на некоторых уже есть) 🐌

custom 59360068645200894796custom 59493999469385539062custom 58101825248186901261

30 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC56 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я не помню делилась я тут или нет своими рисулями которые делаю когда где-то в пути или в очереди новая пачка фэнтезийная

custom 53619962707999560498custom 58077343762801010015custom 53596337767941520613custom 59360068645200894791custom 59493999469385539061custom 59495912061272117901

28 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC58 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Для «полки чудес» рисовала вот такой скотч пару месяцев назад, не знаю они уже его отпечатали или нет, но если вдруг наткнётесь, то это мои лапки :3

custom 58101825248186901269custom 58096683571038161267custom 53596337767941520613custom 59360068645200894791

24 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC78 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

продолжаем следить за пустырником.. неожиданный поворот! в том месте где был тот пустырник который мы с вами наблюдали - исчез! нашла в этом же рассаднике много пустынников с другой стороны. теперь засушивается потихоньку... проверю ещё через несколько недель :)

custom 58101825248186901267custom 58077343762801010013custom 59495912061272117903custom 53596337767941520611custom 58096683571038161261custom 59360068645200894791

17 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC87 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

продолжаем следить за пустырником... отсвел. что дальше??

custom 53619962707999560495custom 58077343762801010015custom 58096683571038161263custom 59360068645200894791

15 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC83 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хочу поделиться чудесной красотой, что заказала у талантливой мастерицы делальщице штуков 🤩 с золотыми ручками 😘 на день рождения мамули волшебный дракончик 💜💙

custom 536199627079995604910custom 53596337767941520619custom 58077343762801010017

13 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC93 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

кстати о том что леплю сморите какой бощк

custom 58077343762801010018custom 58096683571038161268custom 59495912061272117908custom 53619962707999560495

12 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC91 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

леплю я что-то не очень быстро, так что дроп пингвинового будет не скоро, поэтому, пока могу предложить старенькое. 🙈 вот тут можно купить, напоминаю .... https://ghostshelf.shop/merchants/472600ae-2e24-406a-9524-a4ddae5afc96

custom 53596337767941520614custom 53619962707999560494custom 58077343762801010014

9 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC102 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Форзацы в последние буки артмифовские. Получились не очень, второй вообще *лучше промолчу*, так что показываю его только здесь.. Я его ж ещё перерисовывала, изначальную версию кину в комменты. Вот так вот.

custom 53596337767941520616custom 53619962707999560495custom 58077343762801010015

8 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC91 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

поймала красивую луну. удачно встала вокруг листвы словно для меня 🤗

custom 53619962707999560497custom 58077343762801010015custom 53596337767941520614custom 58101825248186901261

8 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC73 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

думала чертополох... оказался пустырник (наверное)

custom 58077343762801010018custom 53619962707999560496custom 59495912061272117905

7 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC76 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

мини-версия карты на карте миров которую нарисовала... (типа чото такое будет примерно ❤️) спойлер который мы можем себе позволить 🕊

custom 53619962707999560495custom 58101825248186901264custom 53596337767941520612

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @natana_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 774,441 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“natana 🍀” (@natana_art), 131 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natana_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.