Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Natali Stylist

Channel

Natali Stylist

@nataliplotnikovastylist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,557subscribers

+293 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001418831267
TypeChannel
Username@nataliplotnikovastylist
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nataliplotnikovastylist

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

3,1983,7383,4687 August 2026 — 3,264 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,264 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,263 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,260 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,254 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,253 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,251 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,248 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,244 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,239 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,232 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,225 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,223 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,221 subscribers25 September 2026 — 3,222 subscribers4 October 2026 — 3,206 subscribers11 October 2026 — 3,201 subscribers14 October 2026 — 3,199 subscribers20 October 2026 — 3,198 subscribers23 October 2026 — 3,738 subscribers26 October 2026 — 3,733 subscribers29 October 2026 — 3,699 subscribers1 November 2026 — 3,697 subscribers4 November 2026 — 3,624 subscribers7 November 2026 — 3,557 subscribers3,5577 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,117–3,819 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 03:453,557-67
4 Nov 2026, 06:313,624-73
1 Nov 2026, 14:293,697-2
29 Oct 2026, 13:553,699-34
26 Oct 2026, 16:543,733-5
23 Oct 2026, 09:263,738+540
20 Oct 2026, 00:573,198-1
14 Oct 2026, 08:453,199-2
11 Oct 2026, 02:203,201-5
4 Oct 2026, 18:373,206-16
25 Sept 2026, 07:413,222+1
15 Sept 2026, 08:383,221-2
11 Sept 2026, 09:203,223-2
6 Sept 2026, 16:393,225-7
1 Sept 2026, 18:553,232-7
30 Aug 2026, 03:353,239-5
27 Aug 2026, 07:053,244-4
24 Aug 2026, 11:253,248-3
20 Aug 2026, 22:343,251-2
17 Aug 2026, 21:233,253first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

254 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14155.5%
😁3513.8%
🔥3212.6%
❤‍🔥93.54%
🍓83.15%
👍83.15%
👌51.97%
💘51.97%
🦄41.57%
✍31.18%
🍾31.18%
🤝10.394%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC291 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ваша вся мятая приехала на премьеру «Наследников»

❤33🔥11💘4

7 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC319 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤13🔥10❤‍🔥3

7 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC303 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Уже сегодня! «Выживалити. Наследники» пятница, 7 авг, 19:00 И прямо сейчас я еду на премьеру, где соберется вся съемочная группа, наследники и их родители Постараюсь снять для вас самое интересное

❤8👍8

7 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC328 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дочка Соня подарила мне книгу о цветах. Издание настолько чудесное, что я просто обязана вам его показать Стихи и истории цветов с цветочными и не только иллюстрациями из Эрмитажа

❤27❤‍🔥5🍾3🔥3💘1

7 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC386 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Мужской отдел назовем по анологии «я бы на него надела»?

  1. Да93%
  2. Нет6%
  3. Есть другое предложение2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤13🤝1

7 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC410 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я бы надела Заметила, то, что я выбираю для себя, вызывает у вас бОльший отклик, нежели просто подборки вещей. Так что рубрике «я бы надела» быть, согласны? И сегодня в этой супер-эго-рубрике жакеты и пиджаки на осень. Разбила для удобства на категории • Пиджаки с элементами деконструкции. Свободные, комфортные и интересные. Самые востребованные мои на каждый день. 1. Мама разрешила 2. Eclata • Жакеты О-силуэта. …

❤23👌5✍3❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC420 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Банты, которые хочется не только 1 сентября В творчестве Сесиль Бансен (Cecilie Bahnsen) бант стал одним из ключевых и узнаваемых элементов. Дизайнер не просто добавляет его как случайную деталь — она исследует эту тему, придумывая самые разные способы вписать бант в вещь. Бантовым вдохновением для Сесиль стал европейский исторический костюм, обильно украшенный лентами. Через бант Сесиль обращается к теме детств…

❤24🍓8🦄4

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @nataliplotnikovastylist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTCAnonymous Poll54 voters

Мужской отдел назовем по анологии «я бы на него надела»?

  1. Да93%
  2. Нет6%
  3. Есть другое предложение2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Анетта Орлова | Философия жизни
@anettaorlova · 40,031
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Natali Stylist” (@nataliplotnikovastylist), 3,557 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nataliplotnikovastylist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.