Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Опочивальня Натали & Исламилы ❤️

@natalilangust

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,342subscribers

+71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001888935159
TypeChannel
Username@natalilangust
Created29 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/natalilangust

Growth

4,2714,3424,306.57 August 2026 — 4,271 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,271 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,288 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,342 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,260–4,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 20:224,342+54
8 Aug 2026, 15:144,288+17
7 Aug 2026, 16:164,271no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:034,271first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
59.1%
avg views ÷ 4,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,570
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held24 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total61,610
Reactions total5,636
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 58s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,636 reactions across 24 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52040837665736718661,05318.7%
🖕75313.4%
custom 542698821413923910459110.5%
5299.39%
custom 54249839289958564924477.93%
3205.68%
custom 53212957991984262282744.86%
💋2694.77%
custom 54539463194019185832113.74%
👻2003.55%
custom 54271181025402082581983.51%
😁1973.50%
🔥1302.31%
❤‍🔥1041.85%
🍓741.31%
🤮540.958%
👀520.923%
😭330.586%
💘280.497%
250.444%
20 further kinds941.67%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,636reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 24 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @natalilangust. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,290 views161 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

коллаб и даже не на фэнсли?!) ну можно в целом😉

custom 5426988214139239104134🤮15custom 54249839289958564927🍓4😱1

8 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC≈1,850 views150 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

100custom 520408376657367186632custom 542498392899585649264👍3🍓2custom 54539463194019185832🤮1

7 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC≈2,010 views199 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5426988214139239104135custom 52040837665736718663521👀3🍓2custom 54249839289958564922🤮1

7 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC≈2,150 views152 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/QCtP6g4lw5U молимся чтоб не удалили!))

💋109🤮2212custom 54249839289958564924🙏21❤‍🔥1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈2,250 views316 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤦‍♀️божее за стоны наложили 18+ ждите перезалив

custom 5204083766573671866234custom 542698821413923910446❤‍🔥17🤮64🍓3💔2💘1

7 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,570 views201 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥121custom 545394631940191858336💋12custom 542498392899585649210custom 532129579919842622864😁4🤮3

7 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,370 views211 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 542498392899585649216620😁14custom 54269882141392391045🍓3🤮21

7 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈2,410 views167 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 5204083766573671866131🍓12❤‍🔥11custom 54249839289958564924custom 54539463194019185834custom 542698821413923910421💅1

6 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈2,470 views199 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💋143custom 54539463194019185832611❤‍🔥4🍓4🤮3custom 54269882141392391043💯2

6 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,430 views256 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁179🖕38💘12custom 54269882141392391048custom 542498392899585649265custom 53212957991984262283👻2

6 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈2,970 views380 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❄️Снежная 7.0 фразы Одетты Из интересного : О Водянице: Она очень милая, красивая и часто поёт мне песни. Только не подумай что она мне нравится! Об Алёше: Аргх... Этот Алёша постоянно находился рядом с Водяницей...Была бы моя воля, я бы убила его. О пуантах: Раньше я танцевала в пуантах, но собака Алёши обоссала их. Теперь приходится танцевать на неудобных туфлях с высоким каблуком..... О Синьоре Хорошо, что путе

custom 5204083766573671866282custom 54269882141392391045817🖕7🍓4🤯4🔥3💘2

6 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC≈2,470 views188 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5424983928995856492143custom 520408376657367186621custom 545394631940191858312🍓3👍3🔥21❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @natalilangust. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 255,481 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Опочивальня Натали & Исламилы ❤️” (@natalilangust), 4,342 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natalilangust.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.