Сегодня ужин у нас на улице, погода прекрасная 😍🤤
❤2

Channel
@nata_lele
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,934subscribers
-2,262 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001210725198 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nata_lele |
| Description | По рекламе👉🏻https://t.me/Nata2236 Инста https://www.instagram.com/nata_lele?igsh=eG1kYXRiMW43YXRi МАХ https://max.ru/channel_nata_lele |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nata_lele |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 15:21 | 45,934 | -90 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:16 | 46,024 | -47 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 06:59 | 46,071 | -29 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 00:44 | 46,100 | -38 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:30 | 46,138 | -35 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:11 | 46,173 | -41 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:45 | 46,214 | -46 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:56 | 46,260 | -24 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:38 | 46,284 | -33 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:06 | 46,317 | -38 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 46,355 | -29 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:47 | 46,384 | -37 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 46,421 | +178 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 46,243 | +71 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 46,172 | -25 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:39 | 46,197 | -15 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 46,212 | -22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 46,234 | -14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 46,248 | -20 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 46,268 | first reading |
278 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 205 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 278 (3 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 253,843 |
| Reactions total | 9,686 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 209 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43,824 reactions across 277 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23,337 | 53.3% | |
| 👍 | 9,406 | 21.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5,792 | 13.2% | |
| 😁 | 887 | 2.02% | |
| 💯 | 763 | 1.74% | |
| 🤣 | 646 | 1.47% | |
| 🙏 | 560 | 1.28% | |
| 😍 | 549 | 1.25% | |
| 🥰 | 338 | 0.771% | |
| 💔 | 219 | 0.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 214 | 0.488% | |
| 😱 | 210 | 0.479% | |
| 🤪 | 205 | 0.468% | |
| 😨 | 166 | 0.379% | |
| 🙉 | 100 | 0.228% | |
| 🤩 | 87 | 0.199% | |
| 🥴 | 72 | 0.164% | |
| 🤔 | 65 | 0.148% | |
| 😭 | 46 | 0.105% | |
| 👀 | 44 | 0.1% | |
| 9 further kinds | 118 | 0.269% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 277 of the 278 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43,824 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nata_lele. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 278 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjewc2z7 | 1 | 2 October 2026 | 2 October 2026 |
| 2W5zFHRnkeD | 1 | 3 September 2026 | 3 September 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqVJ2ABrxSdCYbkJK43fyaH2L9Hi7pF1LtZYTA | 1 | 11 September 2026 | 11 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 70 posts held from the last 30 days (2.86%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сегодня ужин у нас на улице, погода прекрасная 😍🤤
❤2
Пятеро детей. В 34 года у неё уже пятеро детей, а самой младшей всего полтора годика. Она не видит своих детей, потому что вынуждена работать в Эмиратах, чтобы их обеспечивать. Какая же всё-таки несправедливая жизнь. 💔
😭37❤27😘5💔2
У кого также ?🙉😄
🔥32❤10😁4🙉3
🥳 Сегодня кронпринцу Дубая шейху Хамдану исполнилось 44 года! 🇦🇪 Многие знают его как Фаззу. Под этим именем он пишет стихи, а ещё он серьёзно занимается конным спортом. В этом году он выиграл два конных заезда по 160 км🐎 Его отец шейх Мухаммед бин Рашид Аль Мактум, правитель Дубая и премьер-министр ОАЭ. Именно Хамдан как наследный принц должен однажды возглавить Дубай после отца. Кстати, интересно, как здесь всё …
❤58👍12🤣1😁1
Наш вечер 🩷 Я всегда готовлю пиццу примерно одинаково. Пепперони я не люблю. У меня всё просто. На тесто сначала намазываю томатный соус, потом добавляю помидорки, грибы, кукурузу и оливки. В этот раз добавила курицу, а в прошлый раз была колбаска. И сверху много-много сыра! Ну и, конечно, тесто должно быть идеальным. И получается просто вау! 🍕
❤85🔥22😍5😘1
Завтра Виссам с Давидом идут смотреть профессиональный бой в Дубае! 🥊🔥 В Coca-Cola Arena Вадим Немков и Сергей Билостенный будут драться за титул чемпиона мира PFL в тяжёлом весе. И да, туда можно с детьми! До 16 лет — в сопровождении взрослого. Мне уже интересно, как Давид отреагирует, когда увидит такой бой вживую 😄
❤45🔥8👍4
Я последний раз лепила пельмени лет пять назад, а может, и больше. Обычно я больше вареники готовила. Помню, тогда я толком не знала, как сделать фарш, и начинка получилась какая-то невкусная 😅 А в этот раз я уже всё подсмотрела, рецепт изучила, так что должно получиться очень вкусно. Давид у меня пельмени обожает😍 муж тоже, ну и я конечно )) А вы любите ? Часто готовите ?
❤89👍32🔥14
Вы уже слышали про драку в Абу-Даби? В холле отеля сцепились два бойца, и после этого началась общая потасовка, серьезная драка ! И вот, вдруг кто не знал: в Эмиратах за драку можно попасть под суд. А если ты иностранец, суд в зависимости от обстоятельств может даже назначить депортацию! Это все очень серьезно ! Тут ничего не решается кулаками 🙏🏻 По этой истории полиция Абу-Даби уже сообщила, что задержала десять ч…
❤51😱25🔥4
Это Виссам говорит Давиду что делать, когда на него нападает мальчик Тияб (так его зовут) 😅 Я согласна со всеми комментариями , что первому бить нельзя, но когда трогают тебя, нужно защищаться 🥊
❤88👍29💯3
Давид приходит домой из школы и уже который раз рассказывает про одного мальчика. Он задирает детей, бегает за ними, может подставить подножку или ударить со спины. Давид говорит, что он уже подрался с другим мальчиком из школы. И это им только 6 лет 😄🙈 Я помню, как надо мной издевались в школе. Я не умела за себя постоять. Жаловалась учителям, много раз ходила к директору, рассказывала бабушке. А у меня было ощущен…
💯105❤17😱4
Всем привет! У нас в Эмиратах уже немного облачно, обещают ливни. А мой куст, смотрите, как расцвёл! Всё-таки растениям тоже полегче, когда спадает жара. Уже можно посидеть на улице, поесть во дворе. Сейчас у нас +28–30, и для нас это прям хорошая погода. После летних +55 особенно 😅 Теперь ждём дождя. После него обычно ещё прохладнее становится, так что, думаю, скоро уже будет около +20. Прошлой зимой у нас даже +1…
❤81🔥20
Ну вот правда 😂 Какой образ вам понравился больше ?
❤88😁47🔥9💔2😨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 278 posts we hold for @nata_lele. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 6 posts on @nata_lele as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дубай🌴Семья | Рецепты” (@nata_lele), 45,934 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nata_lele.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.