Здесь завтра итоги на 500к - 2 победителя любой сервак - комент подписка Также ролик по мужской внешке будет на след неделе - кто хочет сниматься, жду еще 2 человек 🙃

Channel
NASTYXATW
@nastyxatw
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,165subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001220617281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nastyxatw |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nastyxatw |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 2,165 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 2,169 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 2,174 | -9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 2,183 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 2,189 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 2,195 | +28 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 2,167 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 2,163 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 2,166 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 2,174 | +15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 2,159 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 2,149 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 2,147 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5814569782371947097 | 50 | 54.3% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 22.8% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 21.7% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.09% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Это было вчера 👩🌾 Наконец-то могу ходить, гулять уже побыстрее 🤩
custom 58145697823719470979
💫 снова набор на съемки в ролике на красивые внешки персонажа, абсолютно разного предпочтения: - девушки 4 человека - парни 4 человека (готовность к корректировкам вашего уже готового варианта) от меня денежный приз до 500к и пиар в ролике 🤩 варианты можно закинуть в лс @nastyxapromo или внизу в коменты
🔥8
🤩 здесь, кому нужно было - для удобства добавила импорт всех внешек - просто копипаст + дорабатываете своим мейком и т.д. P.S. по старому ролику запрос настроек внешности по запросу
Выписали с больницы, я дома🛁 Чувствую себя пока средне, еле хожу и не могу сидеть… Стримы будут, но лежа ахах (без вебки) Сказали восстановление займет месяц. Что обещала выложить про внешки, пролетки - сделаю 📷
custom 58145697823719470979😱3
https://t.me/proletka5rp Создала канал по пролеткам, кому хочется чет новенькое поснимать на свой канал, или вы знаете того, кто хочет себе красивых пролеток или начало на видос - то велком Репост - ваша поддержка в моей ситуации 🍕
custom 58145697823719470975🔥2
Posted without readable text
custom 58145697823719470974
Контент пока такой… Врачи слегка ебано обращаются, еда не вкусная, и куча остального не положительного Буду тут еще пару дней может и больше
😱7custom 58145697823719470972
На неопределенный срок
😱10custom 58145697823719470974
Устроила себе небольшой выходной💻 И наконец, добралась до фильма ✨ который недавно добавила себе в папку «Буду смотреть» ✨Хорошая драма, с Зендеей и Паттинсон - очень хороша для разбора отношений. 8/10 (немного скучноват в начале)
🔥7custom 58145697823719470974
Настройки внешности 💓 старый формат настроек работает, но теперь вы выбираете не 1 целую значения, а 0.1 (сотую) пояснение и пример выложила в коменты 🤍 1 вариант: девушка с красными волосами импорт внешности: ce1:NoRgNADGDeBEDmBTAdrAXHAzogNuuSyiAtCOgGwAsYCKJATOvTYSQMzoQC+NAtgJYAPTgDpmsACYB7XugBmAQxzYesTAGt+qDGtz41m5MQDGUnFIBOpCtQNaTZy8UZpxG+6fNWOabnyGiAOyqAEY4KBL60gLICsgALgCyAb40WgAWiBb88ejxFgCuiKqKxoj6EOjEECIAHD…
custom 58145697823719470975😁1
Все настройки внешки выложу вечером 🤩
custom 58145697823719470978🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nastyxatw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NASTYXATW” (@nastyxatw), 2,165 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastyxatw.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.