Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДНЕВНИК CEO АРТИСТА | Настя Шлинчак

Channel

ДНЕВНИК CEO АРТИСТА | Настя Шлинчак

@nastya_shlinchak

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,647subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001585584889
TypeChannel
Username@nastya_shlinchak
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nastya_shlinchak

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6471,6631,6557 August 2026 — 1,663 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,663 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,662 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,660 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,656 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,657 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,651 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,648 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,647 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 36 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,645–1,665 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 10:401,647-1
8 Sept 2026, 02:381,648-3
2 Sept 2026, 22:251,651-6
30 Aug 2026, 10:551,657+1
20 Aug 2026, 10:021,656-4
17 Aug 2026, 15:461,660-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:341,662-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:181,663no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:511,663first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
51s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

642 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31849.5%
🔥10416.2%
💯9915.4%
😁6510.1%
🍾243.74%
🤯172.65%
custom 5361885619557528695132.02%
🥴20.312%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 642 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nastya_shlinchak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2025 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC318 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bankserPhoto

Самые некомпетентные сотрудники нередко становятся руководителями, — Forbes. По данным издания, уверенность в себе, решительность и эффект Даннинга — Крюгера помогают таким людям быстрее продвигаться по карьерной лестнице. @bankser

9💯5🍾1🔥1

14 Apr 2026, 11:03 UTC≈4,710 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, ищу стажера на должность ассистента в PR и менеджмент артистов (мне). Стажировка не оплачивается. Срок: 2 месяца. Кто хочет строить свою работу в индустрии — пишите. Обещаю интересный опыт. Резюме присылать на почту: [email protected] И прикрепите ссылки на соцсети и контакт в Tg.

28🤯16🔥3🥴2

29 Mar 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,510 views41 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Честно, мы долго пытались пробиться в подобное шоу. У меня были переговоры со всеми реалити ТНТ и не только. Были кастинги. Приятно, что в итоге полноценным первым реалити стали именно «Сокровища императора». Искренне считаю, что это лучшее шоу для раскрытия личности. 🔥 С 12 апреля на ТНТ. Мы не знаем, что покажут в эфире, какой будет монтаж и какой образ артиста мы получим на выходе. Меня на съемках не было. А вып

21🔥12🍾6😁1custom 53618856195575286951

19 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,600 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Попасть на большой лейбл — не гарантия успеха для артиста. И я тут не о том, что гарантии успеха вообще не существует. 🤫 А про то, что если вы пока небольшой артист, то скорее, такой же небольшой лейбл даст вам больше вовлеченности (PR-поддержки, бюджета на промо и даже выбьет больше плейлистов). Потому что для них вы можете стать фокусным проектом. А на крупном лейбле затеряться среди уже популярных артистов, проиг

19🔥5

17 Feb 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,310 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вернемся к теме: чего реально стоит бояться артистам? Ответ: не профессионалов, шарлатанов. Они будут вам внушать бред. Они сольют ваши бюджеты. Они выстроят вам нереалистичный вектор восприятия индустрии. Будь то концертник, который завышает ваши гонорары, внушая вам, что вы достойны этого. Только конкурентная среда так не считает и концертов в реальности не будет. А организаторы уже на старте присвоят вам имидж н

17🔥8💯6

16 Feb 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,380 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Для меня феномен музыкальной индустрии в том, что все, кто не имеет к ней отношения, знает, как надо работать артисту. В какой еще сфере это есть? Почему от артиста-лирика просят писать танцевальные песни. Но никто не советует молочному заводу начать выпускать айфоны. Люблю эти вечные: - просто в этого артиста денег не вложили; - нужен клип на эту песню; - давай танцевальный трек, хватит этих сопливых песен (ну, т

31💯13🔥12🍾3🤯1

20 Oct 2025, 13:04 UTC≈1,740 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Знаете, что меня беспокоит в индустрии? Что артисты боятся не того, что нужно. Как показывает моя практика общения с ними, всем страшно, что: 1. Они попадут на продюсерский контракт на лейбл, который раскрутит, но придется отдавать 80% дохода им. 2. Нечестный продюсер, который поможет им на старте за свои деньги и знания стать популярными, будет на них зарабатывать деньги. 3. Что жадные дистрибьюторы будут забирать

19🔥4💯3😁1

20 Oct 2025, 10:40 UTC≈1,430 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давайте откровенно. 3-5-10% на дистрибьюции — вот, что МИФ. Таких ставок НЕТ. А то сейчас артисты прочтут пост и пойдут к своим лейблам, говорить, что те их грабят со своей ставкой выше рынка в 10 раз! Реальность: • 10% у артиста категории А+ со своей командой после долгих, упорных переговоров. И это скорее исключение, и хорошая переговорная работа менеджмента. • 30% — средняя ставка для уже известного артиста кате

18💯10🔥3

16 Oct 2025, 09:35 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 7 August 2026

Тут ведь есть артисты. Что вы ждёте от менеджера? Зачем он вам?

14 Oct 2025, 17:05 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Давайте еще раз. Кто вы? 🫂

  1. Артист (уже выпускаю песни)28%
  2. Хочу быть артистом (пока не выпускал свои песни, но хочу)8%
  3. Менеджмент артиста20%
  4. Хочу работать в индустрии18%
  5. Не имею отношения к индустрии, просто наблюдаю со стороны26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Oct 2025, 14:53 UTC≈1,190 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пост-знакомство. 😊 Хочу знать, кто вы, почему читаете этот канал и что вам интересно. Сначала я. Я тот самый человек, который работает по специальности — отучилась на рекламу и PR. Хотя то, что рассказывали на парах в 2011-15 годах и реальность идут, как две параллельные прямые, и никогда не пересекутся. Сначала я работала в маркетинге HoReCa, потом в агентстве с разными брендами в Питере. Затем в PR-агентстве RSVP

27🔥12

8 Oct 2025, 11:30 UTC≈1,060 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не сравнивайте себя с другими артистами в погоне за их успехами. Бегите только за своим слушателем, ищите его, будьте с ним на связи — вот что реально важно. Где фокус — там и результат. Мы никогда не знаем чужой истории пути и вводных на старте. В любом бизнесе. Сейчас мы знаем Lime, как большой известный бренд, заменивший Zara. Но он существовал с 2008 года. Просто до этого он не был известен. А «Золотое яблоко

19💯8🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nastya_shlinchak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Oct 2025, 17:05 UTCAnonymous Poll237 voters

Давайте еще раз. Кто вы? 🫂

  1. Артист (уже выпускаю песни)28%
  2. Хочу быть артистом (пока не выпускал свои песни, но хочу)8%
  3. Менеджмент артиста20%
  4. Хочу работать в индустрии18%
  5. Не имею отношения к индустрии, просто наблюдаю со стороны26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДНЕВНИК CEO АРТИСТА | Настя Шлинчак” (@nastya_shlinchak), 1,647 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastya_shlinchak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.