Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,495–4,641 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 13:57
4,512
-8
13 Sept 2026, 01:01
4,520
-14
8 Sept 2026, 17:18
4,534
-14
3 Sept 2026, 01:18
4,548
-18
30 Aug 2026, 18:59
4,566
-9
27 Aug 2026, 11:27
4,575
-13
24 Aug 2026, 02:04
4,588
-5
20 Aug 2026, 07:42
4,593
-10
16 Aug 2026, 21:45
4,603
-8
13 Aug 2026, 16:09
4,611
+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:05
4,610
-13
7 Aug 2026, 17:26
4,623
-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:16
4,624
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
20
40.8%
🔥
13
26.5%
💘
7
14.3%
😁
5
10.2%
😍
3
6.12%
🥰
1
2.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nastya_chto_kupit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
я тут, значит, все лето честно проходила в одном коричневом костюме!
ну а что? удобно, красиво, надела — и уже как будто у тебя жизнь под контролем. но до конца лета, между прочим, осталось всего ничего. ДВЕ НЕДЕЛИ
и я внезапно поняла, что если сейчас не достать из шкафа все остальное, то эти вещи так и пролежат там до следующего сезона, ожидая своего звездного часа. поэтому сегодня открыла шкаф с боевым заявлением …
когда воскресное утро начинается в 6 утра, спасают только два проверенных жизнью средства: кофе и маска для лица! одно пытается вернуть меня в мир живых, второе сделать вид что я вообще-то выспалась
рассказываю! купила я тут одну психологическую игру. называется «диалоги вдвоем». смысл простой — задавать друг другу вопросы, разговаривать, узнавать друг друга еще лучше. ну, думаю, романтика, вечер, свечи. почти семейная терапия за цену одной коробочки
приношу домой эту заветную коробку, которую ждала несколько дней. муж смотрит на меня. потом на коробку. потом снова на меня. и так театрально закатывает глаза! и …
знаете, есть у меня одна подружка уверена, у многих есть такая же которая всегда говорит: «ну зачем тебе еще один лонгслив? у тебя же уже есть!», а потом встречает меня через неделю и заявляет: «ссылку скинешь?»
потому что хороший базовый лонгслив — это вообще не про количество. это про то, как он сидит, насколько приятная ткань и как легко собирает образ буквально за две минуты. именно поэтому сегодня принесла вам …
🙏 доброе утро, мои милые дамы! собрала для вас большую подборку образов с wb за прошедшую неделю. здесь есть и повседневные, и более нарядные варианты
все ссылки и артикулы уже на фото — сохраняйте, чтобы ничего не потерять! и обязательно расскажите, какой образ понравился вам больше всего?
сегодня принесла вам сразу два спортивных костюма, и, честно.. я долго думала, какой показать первым! но все же мое сердечко безоговорочно покорил именно коричневый
ну какой же он красивый. этот глубокий шоколадный оттенок выглядит дорого, спокойно и при этом очень стильно. тот самый случай, когда спортивный костюм хочется носить не только по делам, но и просто потому что в нем чувствуешь себя самой красивой
второй…
❤4🔥3💘1😍1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @nastya_chto_kupit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Настя, что купить?” (@nastya_chto_kupit), 4,512 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastya_chto_kupit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.