Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НАСТОН

Channel

НАСТОН

@nastoncomix

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,398subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003051267290
TypeChannel
Username@nastoncomix
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nastoncomix

Growth

2,3982,4142,4069 August 2026 — 2,411 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,411 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,400 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,398 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,414 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,410 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,404 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,398 subscribers9 August 202630 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 21 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,396–2,416 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 17:262,398-6
27 Aug 2026, 15:532,404-6
24 Aug 2026, 16:082,410-4
20 Aug 2026, 19:352,414+16
17 Aug 2026, 09:372,398-2
13 Aug 2026, 11:232,400-11
10 Aug 2026, 09:122,411no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:472,411first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 2,398 subscribers
Avg views / post
617
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held6 (26 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,234
Reactions total104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

374 reactions across 6 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19151.1%
🥰7119.0%
🔥359.36%
❤‍🔥349.09%
🍓266.95%
😇61.60%
💘30.802%
😱30.802%
💋20.535%
🎉10.267%
💅10.267%
😎10.267%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 6 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nastoncomix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC380 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📣 работа над мультфильмом кипит 🎤 озвучка готова, все сцены отрисованы, остаётся только заанимировать и смонтировать ✏️ пополнилась также коллекция моих фонов. Привет всем, кто узнал локацию! Как моя подруга Катя сказала: «место в которое не хочется возвращаться»🤭 🫶 это конечно всё шутки 🦷 вместе с тем на экраны возвращается Блондинчик и оживает Паша - герой со страниц моего комикса «2k17 навечно молодые» 🫣 Судя

🔥2614😇3🍓2❤‍🔥1😎1

4 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC854 views57 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👅 Новые кадры из нового мультика! 🔆 Мне уже не терпится увидеть, как будет выглядеть моя финальная анимация, особенно учитывая, что она ориентирована сразу на два формата одновременно (настоящий вызов для меня!) 🌀 А пока рабочий процесс кипит, делюсь с вами уже готовыми, и всё еще «сырыми» кадрами с таймлайна 💓 Не могу не признаться рисование этого розового платья приносит мне невероятное удовольствие! Особенно в

37🍓7❤‍🔥6🥰6😇1

31 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,220 views53 reactions28 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🪑 я всё-таки решила усидеть на двух стульях… 🎬 новый мультик рисую сразу на два формата: горизонтальный - для YouTube, и вертикальный для наших TikTok и Reels 🎨 будете сами решать, в каком формате и на какой платформе вам будет удобнее смотреть) 💚 зелёная зона - это пространство для горизонтального формата 🧡 оранжевая - для вертикального 🍭 я первый раз делаю что-то подробное, поэтому для меня это очень волнительно

39🍓7❤‍🔥4💘2💋1

30 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,080 views48 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👑 новый сюжетный ролик! 👗 придумала новую забавную историю, планировалось сделать вертикальный формат, но после отрисовки раскадровки мне кажется, что по времени анимация будет тянуть на полноценный мультик 🎥 сегодня пока взвешу все за и против, определюсь с форматом, может удастся убить двух зайцев разом ✏️ а пока можете наблюдать мой новый образ в мультфильме и делать предположения о идее ролика

28🥰11❤‍🔥5🍓3😇1

27 Jul 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,330 views87 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎠 новый ролик уже сегодня! ✏️ Готово на 80%…

🥰5423🍓5🔥2🎉1💅1💋1

26 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,290 views82 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

🖼️ друзья, выложила новый ролик про то, как в 17 лет моя картина попала в музей, обязательно посмотрите! 🎨 сразу захотелось поделился с вами свежими работами, которые я писала во время учёбы 📝 у меня по живописи всегда были пятёрки 😬 Вообще живопись мне очень нравится, только когда она не в 9:00 в субботу Смотрите новое видео в моих: 📲TikTok: nastoncomix 📸Inst: nastoncomix

50❤‍🔥18🔥7😱3🍓2💘1😇1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @nastoncomix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 664,104 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НАСТОН” (@nastoncomix), 2,398 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastoncomix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.