Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for naste.beauty

Channel

naste.beauty

@naste_beauty

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,834subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002496182832
TypeChannel
Username@naste_beauty
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/naste_beauty

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8191,8381,828.57 August 2026 — 1,836 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,836 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,838 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,834 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,834 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,832 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,829 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,828 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,822 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,819 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,835 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,834 subscribers1,8347 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,816–1,841 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:371,834-1
10 Sept 2026, 02:591,835+16
4 Sept 2026, 22:221,819-3
1 Sept 2026, 16:541,822-6
29 Aug 2026, 17:341,828-1
26 Aug 2026, 18:431,829-3
24 Aug 2026, 04:461,832-1
20 Aug 2026, 21:051,833-1
18 Aug 2026, 01:361,834+1
15 Aug 2026, 00:151,833-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:421,834-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:431,838+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:031,836no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:491,836first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2771.1%
😍615.8%
🔥513.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

наращивание за 1:20 — справится даже начинающий мастер🔥 для выпиливания изнанки у меня всегда есть фрезы от nale lab💜 — качественная нарезка, фреза не забивается и отлично справляется со своей задачей — удобная форма - игла: для длинного квадрата просто ✨must have✨ — безопасный носик, клиенту не будет больно 💜Артикул на вб: #WW519067

2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC154 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На самом деле цену позволяет поднять стабильный результат Когда вы перестаете гадать: — какая база подойдет; — почему опять появились отслойки; — почему у одного клиента всё держится, а у другого нет И начинаете понимать, что именно происходит с теми или иными ногтями еще до начала работы Именно тогда появляются уверенность, сарафанное радио и запись на недели вперед Не потому что вы научились делать четкий квадра

6 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC146 viewsread 7 August 2026

Почему одни мастера берут от 2.500₽, а другие годами работают за 1.300₽? Когда я только начинала, мне казалось: ⌛️Чтобы поднять цену, нужно больше опыта Потом думала: Нужно больше клиентов Потом: Нужны красивые фото Но позже я заметила одну вещь🚨 Мастера, которые берут 2500–3000₽, далеко не всегда делают самые сложные дизайны Они делают другое У них клиент не боится записываться снова Потому что знает: ✔ через н

5 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC171 viewsread 7 August 2026

Это самый натуральный маник… Тут нет геля

5 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC193 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Топаю делать себе маник Пришла новая лампа для полимеризации 😎 сделаю затест и потом покажу уже

6

5 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC194 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рынок классных мастеров пустует… И маник за 2500 мне не нужен ради цены Можно за 4000, но бляха чтоб он был эстетичным, а не толстым

3🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC193 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я щас искала мастера, чтобы не идти самой делать маник Из 30 мастеров мне понравились только 2 и у них ближайшая запись 24 августа Остальные делают откровенную х..ню Простите но я щас буду плакать Это кошмар Пойду щас маник делать сама…

4🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC201 viewsread 7 August 2026

Самое печальное, что многие мастера даже не понимают, почему это происходит А ведь проблема часто начинается ещё до того, как вы начали выполнять работу ▪️С диагностики ногтя ▪️С подготовки ▪️С выбора материала именно под этого клиента Если ты хочешь поднять прайс, сначала нужно сделать так, чтобы клиенты перестали возвращаться по гарантии✅

5 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC210 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ты можешь делать очень красивые ногти… и всё равно терять клиентов❌ Когда мастер выкладывает работу сразу после маникюра — почти у всех красиво Ровный квадрат Идеальный блик Глянцевое покрытие Но клиент носит твой маникюр 3–4 недели Именно там начинается настоящая проверка твоих навыков😬 Если через неделю появляются: — отслойки — позже-белые пятна — трещины — сломанные углы Клиент не будет разбираться, виноват л

4 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC232 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

За 1:20 сделали такой необычный френч🤩

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @naste_beauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Poll54 voters

Что ты меняла чаще всего в попытках избавиться от отслоек?

  1. Базу46%
  2. Гель17%
  3. Лампу9%
  4. Технику44%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“naste.beauty” (@naste_beauty), 1,834 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naste_beauty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.