Channel
@nashy_liudi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,838subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001497350365 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nashy_liudi |
| Created | 18 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nashy_liudi |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 1,838 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 1,839 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 1,842 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 1,846 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 1,850 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 1,851 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 1,853 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 1,852 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 1,855 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 1,859 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 1,859 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
392 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 79 | 20.2% | |
| ❤ | 74 | 18.9% | |
| 👍 | 73 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 69 | 17.6% | |
| 😁 | 37 | 9.44% | |
| 😱 | 17 | 4.34% | |
| 🤬 | 17 | 4.34% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 3.06% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 2.30% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.765% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 392 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 9 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
День Победы 9 мая 1945 года! Напомню, может кто не знает, Пасха в 1945-м пришлась на 6 мая – День Георгия Победоносца. Это глубочайший и мощный символ для нас. Маршал Георгий Жуков возил с собой всюду икону Казанской Божьей Матери. И далеко не случайно разгром немецкого фашизма пришелся на праздник Георгия Победоносца – 6 мая 1945 года. Именно в этот день Германия признала свое поражение в войне. Капитуляцию принял…
❤13
Акт о безоговорочной капитуляции Германии #немного_истории @nashy_liudi
❤11
Речь Сталина. Обращение к советскому народу 9 мая 1945 года #немного_истории @nashy_liudi
❤10
Наши победители!!! Парад Победы 9 мая 1945 года! #немного_истории @nashy_liudi
❤8👍1
Кадры последних мгновений Великой Отечественной. Батарея капитана РККА Ряжкина Николая встретила 9 мая 1945 года в австрийском Амштеттене. #события #это_наши_люди #Отечественная_война @nashy_liudi
❤7👍1
Несмотря на то, что СМИ в России с 1993 года не подвергаются цензуре (ст. 29 Конституции РФ) при запрете и на государственную идеологию, ИИ предлагают не оставить без контроля https://max.ru/tass_agency/AZ2GLp3PCII, и это правильно. #суверенитет @nashy_liudi
❤6
«В этих масштабных миграционных процессах всегда замешан Путин», — заявил газете Financial Times европейский комиссар по внутренним делам и миграции Магнус Бруннер. И это сказал представитель той самой официальной Европы, которая поддержала нападение на Ирак, Ливию, Афганистан, Сирию, Палестину, а теперь и Иран. То есть, нелогика еврочиновников такова: устроить пожарища за забором своего «цветущего сада» но, в том, …
💯8
Анастасия Коваленкова, писатель, художник ВОЙНА (сентябрь 2022 года) У меня началась война. Прямо тут, где мой суп. У меня началась война. Прямо здесь, где мой зуб. И война началась даже там, где сердце моё. Там, где я, где мой муж, где мой сын, там где Ё-МОЁ. Там где боль, где душа, где народ, где земля, где страх. Там где дух мой живёт, и где мой последний АХ. Значит негде сокрыться, и, значит, волчица — в бой. Е…
❤13👏1🔥1
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻Разрушение этих иллюзий уже меняет внешнее восприятие этих стран как союзниками, так и их противниками. Если первые обескуражены, разгневаны, то вторые — всё больше набираются смелости и решительности. Из обломков иллюзий проявится новый, более справедливый мир и новая реальность, которая для одних будет шокирующей, а другим раскроет новые возможности. Марсель Гареев #правда_о_западе @nashy_liudi
👍13🔥3👏2😁1
Решения, поступки людей определяются не только фактами, но и тем, как они воспринимаются, что часто является не более, чем иллюзией. И вот, в режиме реального времени, мы видим крушение иллюзий о США и Израиле. Разрушенные иллюзии о США: 1. Всесильность, дающая возможность диктовать другим свою волю. 2. Безопасность, которую гарантирует союзникам защита США, пусть и ценой собственного суверенитета. 3. Кара, которая …
🔥8
Хроника нападения на Иран #немного_юмора @nashy_liudi
😁12🤩2
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻Поняв это, монархии предложат Ирану следующую сделку: 1) инвестировать 4 триллиона долларов из своих суверенных фондов в восстановление иранской инфраструктуры; 2) обязаться платить налог Ирану за прохождение нефтеналивных судов через Ормузский пролив, поскольку Иран станет единственной страной, способной обеспечить безопасность пролива. То есть фактически страны залива перестанут быть клиентами США и станут кл…
👍21🤔7🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nashy_liudi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НАШИ ЛЮДИ” (@nashy_liudi), 1,838 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nashy_liudi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.