Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Продюсерский центр НАШИ

Channel

Продюсерский центр НАШИ

@nashi_music

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,440subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001775438827
TypeChannel
Username@nashi_music
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nashi_music

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@RusOstashko/31911 May 2026, 15:27 UTC@nashi_music/1016 · this entry11 May 2026, 17:18 UTC1.001.8 hours
@RusOstashko/32113 May 2026, 17:00 UTC@nashi_music/1017 · this entry13 May 2026, 17:23 UTC1.0023 minutes
@RusOstashko/32727 May 2026, 14:55 UTC@nashi_music/1021 · this entry27 May 2026, 15:53 UTC1.0058 minutes
@RusOstashko/32828 May 2026, 17:00 UTC@nashi_music/1023 · this entry28 May 2026, 18:43 UTC1.001.7 hours
@RusOstashko/33029 May 2026, 09:52 UTC@nashi_music/1024 · this entry29 May 2026, 10:57 UTC1.0066 minutes
@RusOstashko/33322 Jun 2026, 15:02 UTC@nashi_music/1028 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 16:29 UTC1.0087 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@RusOstashko7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0066 minutes@RusOstashko (70)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 May 2026 to 26 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @RusOstashko. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,4401,4441,4426 August 2026 — 1,444 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,444 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,442 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,440 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 12 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,439–1,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:071,440-2
12 Aug 2026, 03:521,442-2
6 Aug 2026, 07:481,444no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:161,444first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.74%
avg views ÷ 1,440 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held20 (11 May 202626 July 2026)
Views total194
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈87 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Клип «Рокоссовский» уже в сети! Представляем вам новый клип «Рокоссовский» из цикла «Личности в истории». Это композиция о человеке из стали, гениальном полководце Великой Отечественной войны. Мы вложили в этот трек всю мощь, чтобы наша история прозвучала так, как она того заслуживает – гордо и громко Смотрите полную версию по ссылке ▶️ YouTube | VK Видео Проект реализуется при поддержке МузКонтент ПФКИ #МузКонте

24 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈107 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

В это воскресенье выйдет новый клип «Рокоссовский» из цикла «Личности в истории» Меня всегда восхищали люди, которые остаются верны себе, несмотря на переменчивость мира. Те, для кого понятия долга, чести и справедливости – не пустой звук, а их фундамент личности. Стальной внутренний стержень, который невозможно сломать ни при каких обстоятельствах. Следите за новостями, чтобы ничего не пропустить! Проект реализуе

13 Jul 2026, 15:43 UTC≈171 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

⚔️ Клип «Суворов» уже в сети! Представляем вам новый клип, посвящённый великому русскому полководцу Александру Суворову – человеку, чьи подвиги, мужество и военный талант навсегда вошли в историю. Смотрите полную версию по ссылке ▶️ VK Видео Проект реализуется при поддержке МузКонтент ПФКИ #МузКонтент_ПФКИ #Поддержано_ПФКИ

10 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC≈193 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

СКОРО ПРЕМЬЕРА КЛИПА «СУВОРОВ» Уже в понедельник выйдет клип о полководце, не знавшем поражений. За его спиной – 60 победных сражений. Взятие Измаила. Разгром при Рымнике. Легендарный переход через Альпы. Александр Суворов – великий стратег, доказавший, что интеллект и характер всегда побеждают грубую силу. Осталось совсем немного... Проект реализуется при поддержке МузКонтент ПФКИ #МузКонтент_ПФКИ #Поддержано_ПФ

7 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC≈197 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Провал или респект? RADIO TAPOK смотрит клип «Нахимов» 🎸 Олег Абрамов (RADIO TAPOK) оценил новый клип из цикла «Личности в истории». Человек, который реально собирает стадионы и шарит в историческом роке лучше большинства. Смотрите разбор и оставляйте свои комментарии под постом 👇 📹 Полную версию клипа «Нахимов» можно посмотреть в VK Video Проект реализуется при поддержке МузКонтент ПФКИ #МузКонтент_ПФКИ #Поддер

26 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTC≈226 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🎖️ Премьера! Дарья Котова – Рокоссовский Представляем вам песню «Рокоссовский» – новую работу из музыкального цикла «Личности в истории». Эта композиция посвящена Константину Рокоссовскому – одному из величайших полководцев, человеку невероятного мужества, таланта и силы духа. Его имя прочно связано с ключевыми победами Красной армии в годы Великой Отечественной войны, и многие историки считают его одним из крупней

26 Jun 2026, 08:42 UTC≈159 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏒 Премьера! Новая песня «Мы в хоккее» уже доступна на всех музыкальных площадках. Надеюсь, эта песня станет хорошим спутником перед играми, тренировками, дальними выездами и важными матчами. Слушайте, сохраняйте и делитесь с друзьями ➡️ https://band.link/mivhockee

24 Jun 2026, 17:59 UTC≈200 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

RADIO TAPOK оценил клип «Маршал Жуков» Олег Абрамов знает толк в тяжелом звучании и историческом контексте. В этом видео он впервые смотрит клип на песню «Маршал Жуков» в исполнении Дарьи Котовой (в рамках проекта «Личности в истории»). Честная реакция и профессиональный взгляд на всё: от мелодии и вокала до визуального ряда. 🇷🇺 Полная версия клипа «Маршал Жуков» уже доступна в VK Video и на YouTube Смотрите разбо

22 Jun 2026, 16:29 UTC≈184 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🏒 26 июня состоится премьера новой песни «МЫ В ХОККЕЕ» Не секрет, что хоккей занимает особое место в моей жизни, поэтому эта премьера для меня особенно важна. Говорят, трус не играет в хоккей. И это сто процентов так. Здесь нет места слабости, здесь важны реакция и надежное плечо брата по команде. Я давно хотел записать песню, которая будет звучать как гимн для всех неравнодушных к этому спорту. Чтобы включал перед

22 Jun 2026, 09:41 UTC≈196 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

26.06 | Дарья Котова – Рокоссовский История не прощает слабости и запоминает только тех, кто выкован из стали. 24 июня 1945 года. Красная площадь. Парад Победы, которым командует человек несгибаемой воли – Константин Рокоссовский. Один из крупнейших полководцев Второй мировой войны, чье имя звучало как приговор для врагов и как символ абсолютного триумфа. Уже в эту пятницу мы представим вам новый трек «Рокоссовски

5 Jun 2026, 08:22 UTC≈266 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ПРЕМЬЕРА | ДАРЬЯ КОТОВА – СУВОРОВ Александр Суворов провел более 60 сражений и не проиграл ни одного. Брал крепости, которые считались неприступными, и громил армии, превосходящие его войска в четыре раза. Его принцип – идти до конца. Мы перевели эту историю на язык современной музыки. Слушайте песню на всех площадках ➡️ https://band.link/suvorovdariyakotova Проект реализуется при поддержке МузКонтент ПФКИ. #МузК

1 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC≈279 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

5.06 | Дарья Котова – Суворов В эту пятницу состоится премьера новой песни. Она посвящена Александру Васильевичу Суворову – полководцу, который не проиграл ни одного из более чем 60 сражений. Он создал собственную систему подготовки войск и оставил после себя масштабное теоретическое наследие. Жмите по ссылке, чтобы поддержать релиз и услышать песню первыми ➡️ https://band.link/suvorovdariyakotova Проект реализует

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nashi_music. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,056,613 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Продюсерский центр НАШИ” (@nashi_music), 1,440 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nashi_music.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.