Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мероприятия НАСФП

@nasfp_conf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

647subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002072159719
TypeChannel
Username@nasfp_conf
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nasfp_conf

Growth

6477 Aug 2026, 10:47 — 647 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:11 — 647 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:478 Aug 2026, 06:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 646–648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:11647no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:47647first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.2%
avg views ÷ 647 subscribers
Avg views / post
222
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held20 (6 June 202624 July 2026)
Views total443
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4560.0%
1418.7%
👍1317.3%
❤‍🔥11.33%
🎉11.33%
👀11.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nasfp_conf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC169 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Безопасный счёт в Центробанке! Как мошенники могут заставить нас поверить в этот абсурд? Новая схема финансовых мошенников - предложить в связи с якобы утечкой данных обновить “основной счет” в Центробанке. В чем суть этого мошенничества, чем пугают жертву обмана и что от нее хотят добиться. О содержании новой мошеннической схемы и ее деталях - главный редактор Finversia Ян Арт. Смотрите в нашем новом выпуске СТОП

2

16 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC274 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Куда вложить миллион? Финансовый вопрос на Finvresia Как превратить миллион рублей в работающий капитал и как не потерять деньги? Разбираем стратегии, которые подходят сегодня. Положить на вклад и ждать проценты? Сделать первый взнос по ипотеке? Купить дивидендные акции или ОФЗ? Золото, валюта, биткоин или народный гараж? Смотрите сегодня в 19.00 мск ➛YouTube - https://youtube.com/live/Ib6RZHRTe-4 ➛Rutube - http

🔥7

6 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC393 views11 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие друзья! Национальный центр финансовой грамотности тестирует совершенно новый формат диалога о личных финансах - театральный перформанс. 30 июля в Театре Современной Драматургии в Москве состоится театральный эксперимент о ваших отношениях с деньгами Деньги: свобода и зависимость Без сценария, без лекций — только живые истории, прожитые на сцене как будто про вас. Подробности и билеты на сайте https://куль

🔥9❤‍🔥1👀1

30 Jun 2026, 13:40 UTC368 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На нашем канале ВК Видео - новый выпуск проекта СТОП.ОБМАН Говорим о том, как не стать дроппером по ошибке и как уберечь от этого подростков (а именно на них идёт охота!). https://vkvideo.ru/video-212038231_456239050 #СтопОбман

🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 11:36 UTC386 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сегодня, 22 июня начинается 14-й финансовый онлайн-марафон Finversia На восьми прямых эфирах марафона разговор пойдет о состоянии и перспективах экономики мира и России, фондовых рынках – мировом и российском, прогнозах по курсу рубля, доллара, евро и других валют, инвестициях в золото, серебро и недвижимость, вариантах вложений и сбережений денег в нынешние бурные времена, новых финансовых законах, криптовалютах в

👍3🔥1

19 Jun 2026, 12:40 UTC284 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Конференция Личное финансовое планирование – 10 октября в Москве Дорогие друзья! С радостью открываем для вас регистрацию на нашу осеннюю конференцию «Личное финансовое планирование. Homo emotionalis vs Homo economicus». 10 октября мы приглашаем вас на нашу традиционную площадку Альфа Измайлово в Москве, чтобы обсудить построение финансовой стратегии через призму поведенческой экономики и психологии (не забывая пр

🔥5👍4

19 Jun 2026, 08:15 UTC230 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Опубликовали 12-й выпуск подкаста Профессия: Финансовый советник! Смотрите на Рутуб https://rutube.ru/video/34e5db1522722a91e05894f4b8fbdc3e/ Ютуб https://youtu.be/OTqNUAXlAHY Герой выпуска Андрей Гончар в интервью Дарье Андриановой рассказывает о своём пути в профессию – почему ушёл из банковской системы и с какими сложностями столкнулся на старте работы финсоветником. Вы узнаете, как находить клиентов среди топ-

4🔥2

16 Jun 2026, 06:14 UTC292 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Переведите залог и квартиры вы не увидите никогда - еще одна схема мошенников в проекте СТОП.ОБМАН Мошенники ставят ловушки тем, кто ищет новую квартиру. Жертву “ловят” на красивое объявление с низкой ценой, затем просят перевести залог за просмотр квартиры и исчезают. Как выявить эту схему, как защититься от нее, как еще могут обмануть с квартирами - финансовый советник Андрей Гончар. Видео по ссылке https://vk.c

🔥5👍1

12 Jun 2026, 13:29 UTC293 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие друзья! Не теряйте нас;) Мы выдохнули после конференции и продолжаем работу. На следующей неделе проведём полезный эфир на Finversia, выпустим новые видео СТОП.ОБМАН и свежий подкаст с финансовым советником Андреем Гончаром! С праздником вас и отличных вам выходных!

🔥4

7 Jun 2026, 13:00 UTC359 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дорогие друзья! Спасибо за внимание и интерес к конференции «Портфельные инвестиции. Одиссея российского инвестора». Запись конференции готова для просмотра и направлена всем участникам на почту. Если не получили письмо - обязательно напишите в комментариях. Презентации выступающих опубликованы в разделе Программа сайта конференции. Чтобы просмотреть интересную вам презентацию, нажмите на тему выступления, подсвече

3🔥3🎉1

6 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC260 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что сейчас для вас самое сложное на «пути героя» (работе финансового советника)?

  1. Низкое доверие к фондовому рынку со стороны клиентов48%
  2. Высокая конкуренция со стороны роботов-советников и ИИ9%
  3. Нехватка времени на обучение и повышение квалификации24%
  4. Сложность с соблюдением всех требований законодательства18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nasfp_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

Что сейчас для вас самое сложное на «пути героя» (работе финансового советника)?

  1. Низкое доверие к фондовому рынку со стороны клиентов48%
  2. Высокая конкуренция со стороны роботов-советников и ИИ9%
  3. Нехватка времени на обучение и повышение квалификации24%
  4. Сложность с соблюдением всех требований законодательства18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jun 2026, 13:00 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Что сегодня сильнее всего повышает лояльность клиента?

  1. Открытость и честность, в том числе раскрытие всех рисков62%
  2. Быстрота реакции на запросы клиентов и изменение ситуации на рынке9%
  3. Юридическая чистота и прозрачность предлагаемых решений12%
  4. Наличие уникальных продуктов и решений6%
  5. Эмоциональная поддержка клиента12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jun 2026, 10:34 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

Как вы считаете, можно ли сейчас построить долгосрочный инвестиционный портфель (на 5+ лет) ТОЛЬКО из российских активов?

  1. Да, можно. В РФ есть акции, облигации и недвижимость с понятной доходностью.59%
  2. С большими оговорками. Требуется очень активный мониторинг и быстрая реакция.18%
  3. Нет, невозможно из-за регуляторных, геополитических и инфляционных рисков.21%
  4. Сейчас — нет, но через 2–3 года ситуация может измениться.3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

Как вы относитесь к новациям в регулировании криптовалюты?

  1. Прекрасно, наконец-то можно будет безопасно инвестировать в крипту34%
  2. Отрицательно, закон создает препятствия для развития рынка20%
  3. Равнодушно, буду и дальше пользоваться иностранной инфраструктурой5%
  4. Меня это не касается, у меня нет криптовалюты37%
  5. Законопроект «не читал, но осуждаю».2%
  6. Наконец-то регулятор всерьез взялся за этих мошенников2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jun 2026, 08:15 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Какой глобальный риск, по вашему мнению, станет главной «Сциллой» для инвесторов до конца 2026 года?

  1. Рост инфляции/стагфляция11%
  2. Новый виток геополитических конфликтов52%
  3. Пузырь на рынке ИИ (переоцененность технологий)14%
  4. Падение сырьевых цен (нефть, металлы)5%
  5. Разрушение цепочек поставок, тарифные войны7%
  6. Продовольственная безопасность0%
  7. Рост бюджетных расходов11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 336,762 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мероприятия НАСФП” (@nasfp_conf), 647 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasfp_conf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.