Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НАРЕЗКИ АККАРИ

Channel

НАРЕЗКИ АККАРИ

@narezki_aqcari

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

458subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002661570268
TypeChannel
Username@narezki_aqcari
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/narezki_aqcari

Growth

4584624606 August 2026 — 461 subscribers6 August 2026 — 461 subscribers7 August 2026 — 462 subscribers13 August 2026 — 458 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 457–463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:06458-4
7 Aug 2026, 08:53462+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:04461no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:30461first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
274.0%
avg views ÷ 458 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,250
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.976%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held16 (6 May 20261 August 2026)
Views total5,019
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

277 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15154.5%
🔥3713.4%
🥴269.39%
134.69%
❤‍🔥134.69%
👌93.25%
👎82.89%
🙏72.53%
🍓62.17%
💘41.44%
🤪20.722%
😱10.361%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 277reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 23:28 UTC153 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Только кровью отмываться «Ку! Кстати, нарезка где ты меня хвалишь набрала 200к лайков. Мне уже можно а коалицию добра или еще пока рановато?» «Да??? Нее, Аккари, тебе еще отмываться, отмываться, отмываться и отмываться, блять, понимаешь? То есть, я только приветствую вот это твои подуги, да, исправить всю ситуацию. Ну ты слишком много сделала за эту жизнь плохого, блять. "Ей не отмыться" не, мне кажется что отмыться

11🍓5

28 Jul 2026, 23:13 UTC284 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Донаты Искандера [2/2] «МНЕ ОДИНОКО НА ЭТОЙ КАРТИНОЧКЕ, МОЖНО МНЕ СЕСТРИЧКУ ДАНИЛОЧКУ С УШКАМИ И НА МОТОЦИКЛЕ В ВИДЕ ШЛЕМА ФУРРИ И В КОЛГОТКАХ В СЕТКУ!» «Ну это ебануто, видите? Донатер у меня какой-то, щас, "iskansor" какой-то» «Данила сан, охаешечки даттебаешечки! это полная подстава кун Владимирович! мне не оч понравилось в платье тусить» ««Данила сан, охаешечки даттебаешечки» ой бля. «Это полная подстава кун Вл

7🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 23:13 UTC232 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Донаты Искандера [1/2] «ВСЕМ КУ! АККАРИ СПАСИБО ЗА РИСУНОК, НО МНЕ СЕСТРИЧКИ ДАНИЛОЧКИ НЕ ХВАТАЕТ В ТАКОМ ЖЕ ПЛАТЬИЦЕ СПАСИБО ТЕБЕ, СДЕЛАЙ ЕЕ ЕЩЕ С УШКАМИ» «Полный пиздец, Искандер. Вот еще раз перечитываю "iskancore", смотрите.: «Всем ку! Аккари, спасибо за рисунок.» Понравилось, да? Искандер. «Но мне сестрички Данилочки» Ну я тебя не знаю, чувак. Ну хуй знает какая там сестричка. «Не хватает в таком же платьице.»

4🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC≈4,350 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Сказано — сделано «Аккари, привет.» «Я вернулась с Тайланда и теперь наконец выполнила твою просьбу, становлюсь подсосом ДК день 2» «Хорошо, Аккари, ну блять. Бляять, пиздец. «Ты не сказал какое платье рисовать, поэтому я доверилась выбору тиктокерских. Искан, прости пожалуйста, все вопросы к твоему другу.» Я ему не друг, блять, если что. Я вообще не знаю этого человека, имейте ввиду. Кошмар, блять, Аккари, это кош

❤‍🔥95💘4

3 Jul 2026, 20:53 UTC573 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

ПОЖЕЛАНИЯ К СЛЕДУЩЕМУ АРТУ «Даня дай идею какой арт нарисовать с Искандером за его базар кривой, или наоборот надо нормальный, как скажешь так и сделаю» «Так, какой арт нужно нарисовать с Искандером за его базар кривой? Мне кажется, что нужно что-то такое, да, где он там, аэа, в платьице, блять. Чет такое, блять, хахаха, блять. Давай, аккари, замутим. Да, прикольчик, блять, почему бы и нет?» #dk НАРЕЗКИ АККАРИ

139

Signed ‌ུ‌᭢༘۠ destillięrter l!queųr

3 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC510 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

ДК РЕПОСТИТ АККАРИ «Даня, ну ты видел уже, но нужно всем показать какие мы молодцы» «Ладно, ладно, показывай» «Даня, ходят слухи что если не только комментить мои арты, но еще и репостить, то отныне будут только скрепные и красивые, я уже в процессе исправления» «Аккари, я тебе только счастья желаю. Молодец, бля. А что-то я не подумал репостнуть, что-то не поддержал в этом моменте. Давай, зайду в ТикТок, щас репост

👌93

Signed ‌ུ‌᭢༘۠ destillięrter l!queųr

22 Jun 2026, 12:39 UTC538 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

РЕАКЦИЯ ДК НА ДОНАТ АККАРИ «Аккари, слушаем тебя внимательно» «Даня, ты знал что Вадимка был женат на сестре рыжего из Иванушек, и она тетя Сережки. В прошлый раз забыла рассказать когда видос смотрели.» «Спасибо большое, Аккари, еще и без рисунков даже где я фурри. Слава тебе, Боже! Спасибо большое, Аккари. Да, мне помню рассказывали, просто я забываю, блять. Чета они, да, какие-то родственные связи у них определе

13🔥5🥴4

Signed sœz!opathisch mænsch!nfeind

7 Jun 2026, 17:07 UTC768 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

ДК ХВАЛИЛ АККАРИ «Даня, мы с Левладесу напиздели 34-летнему фембою из ТикТока, что я транс, и после твоего сравнения меня с леди боями он даже не сомневается.» «Блять, Аккари, держи меня в курсе, пожалуйста, вот этих движух. Не знаю, блять, как-то интересно, что ли, блять: «Мы с Левладесу напиздели 34-летнему фембою, что я транс». Бля. Вау. Ну просто ахуительная история. Хорошо, что ты сейчас в начале стрима это рас

27🥴5❤‍🔥4

Signed 𓂃ᮬํsçh?uţzíg šcĥwänẓ‌e🍮𝅦 ᜔ુ ࣪

16 May 2026, 14:28 UTC≈1,170 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ‧₊˚<<╌────┈⊰᯽⊱┈────╌>>˚₊‧ привет, я ликерр, в этом канале будут нарезки с упоминанием аккари и не только ˚.⋆⁺₊⠾ссылки.: наша предложка.: @narezkiaqccari_bot тгк аккари.: @aqcari лс для связи.: @spizcheno <<--------------------------------------------->> ˚.⋆⁺₊⠾теги ꣑꣡ꪰ.персоны.: #dk #iscan #mzlff #drakeoffc #bebrina #noils #feanrir <<--------------------------------------------->> ꣑꣡ꪰ.другое.: #важное #кон

🥴17🙏74🤪2🍓1

10 May 2026, 18:36 UTC≈1,230 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @perfi_lka

кто нибудь напишите аккари чтобы удалила свою пизданутую аву, от неё разит нетрадиционными ценностями а я такое не поддерживаю

17

Signed чортово колесо

10 May 2026, 18:33 UTC≈1,170 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

А ДАВАЙТЕ СЕГОДНЯ БЕЗ НАРЕЗОК

22👎8

Signed чортово колесо

7 May 2026, 21:01 UTC≈1,300 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

я на все нарезки делаю вам цитаты, скажите, а вы читаете их?

  1. да, зачастую читаю85%
  2. нет, обычно я смотрю нарезку15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

Signed чортово колесо

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @narezki_aqcari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 May 2026, 21:01 UTCAnonymous Poll107 voters

я на все нарезки делаю вам цитаты, скажите, а вы читаете их?

  1. да, зачастую читаю85%
  2. нет, обычно я смотрю нарезку15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 107,691 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НАРЕЗКИ АККАРИ” (@narezki_aqcari), 458 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/narezki_aqcari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.