Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Почта России

Channel

Почта России

@napochte

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

130,799subscribers

+7,748 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001244837224
TypeChannel
Username@napochte
DescriptionРассказываем здесь о том, что в Почте нового и интересного Группа Вконтакте https://vk.ru/russianpost Канал для малого и среднего бизнеса: @b2bpochta Канал с советами для клиентов: @russianpochta Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru
Created18 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/napochte

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@russianpochta/80728 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC@napochte/2013 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC1.002 days
@russianpochta/81129 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC@napochte/2021 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC1.009 days
@napochte/2017 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC@russianpochta/8162 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC1.004.8 hours
@napochte/2029 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC@russianpochta/82622 Aug 2026, 06:40 UTC1.0024 hours
@russianpochta/82928 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC@napochte/2038 · this entry30 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC1.002 days
@russianpochta/8399 Sept 2026, 13:45 UTC@napochte/2075 · this entry13 Sept 2026, 10:08 UTC1.004 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@russianpochta9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 days@russianpochta (5–4)
@b2bpochta5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0034 minutesthis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 74 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

123,051131,224127,137.5130,7995 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +7,748. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121,825–132,450 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 08:00130,799-121
8 Nov 2026, 20:38130,920-304
7 Nov 2026, 09:49131,224+474
6 Nov 2026, 11:34130,750-109
5 Nov 2026, 12:15130,859+243
4 Nov 2026, 12:58130,616-184
3 Nov 2026, 14:40130,800+79
2 Nov 2026, 17:35130,721+254
1 Nov 2026, 14:56130,467+268
31 Oct 2026, 15:08130,199-192
30 Oct 2026, 18:39130,391-36
29 Oct 2026, 15:56130,427+243
28 Oct 2026, 16:46130,184+69
27 Oct 2026, 16:06130,115+108
26 Oct 2026, 12:31130,007-12
25 Oct 2026, 11:37130,019+239
24 Oct 2026, 12:00129,780+39
23 Oct 2026, 10:37129,741+28
22 Oct 2026, 07:00129,713+136
20 Oct 2026, 23:07129,577first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 130,799 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,700
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held87 (16 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total414,380
Reactions total1,407
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,560
Videos
≈129
Links
≈609

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,770 reactions across 85 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,68346.5%
👍1,24021.5%
🔥3856.67%
🎉2684.64%
💯2293.97%
👏1502.60%
🤩1362.36%
🤔1182.05%
👌971.68%
😍861.49%
⚡781.35%
😎771.33%
🥰671.16%
😁420.728%
🐳370.641%
🤗260.451%
🎃220.381%
🤣130.225%
🤝110.191%
💋50.087%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,918 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 86 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @napochte. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 87 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 05:15 UTC≈2,120 views35 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💌 Почта снижает тарифы на письменную корреспонденцию на 15% До 31 декабря 2026 года новые клиенты могут отправлять письма и бандероли по сниженным тарифам — как по России, так и за границу 🤩 Как воспользоваться? 1️⃣ Авторизуйтесь в личном кабинете на сайте pochta.ru или в приложении Почты. 2️⃣ Выберите «Отправить» → «Письмо», укажите параметры отправления. Скидка применяется автоматически. 3️⃣ Оплатите онлайн ба…

❤24🐳7🤩4

8 Nov 2026, 08:57 UTC≈3,080 views39 reactions11 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Разные народы — одна команда: Дагестанская почта Завершаем серию историй о регионах, людях и традициях нашей большой команды. 📍Сегодняшняя остановка — Дагестан Это удивительный край седых гор, гостеприимства и культурного многообразия. Здесь проживает более 30 коренных народностей ⚜ Легендарное серебро Кубачи, глиняная керамика Балхара и табасаранские ковры, чьи узоры не тускнеют веками  Как шерстяные нити переп…

❤25🥰7🤩5😍2

6 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC≈106,000 views100 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🎉58❤26👍16

5 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC≈4,090 views53 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Правильный ответ — Роковые марки Именно так в русском переводе звучит название детектива. В книге польской писательницы Иоанны Хмелевской коллекционирование марок — ключевая сюжетная линия и один из мотивов расследования 🕵‍♀ 🎁 Главная героиня хочет заполучить редкие болгарский почтовый блок с изображением птиц. Что из этого вышло, читайте в книге 🤫

❤40⚡7🥰6

4 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC≈4,250 views65 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🍄🥨 Почта объединяет вкусы России Мы живём в разных городах и регионах, но нас связывают история, культура и умение поддерживать друг друга в трудную минуту. ▶️ В День народного единства предлагаем сыграть в онлайн игру 🏆 Соберите максимум очков за 30 секунд и узнайте больше о народах нашей страны. Отправиться в путешествие по России

❤38🔥16😍9👍2

3 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC≈4,310 views52 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🛳️Где заканчивается асфальт и начинается океан: марка к 330-летию Военно-морского флота России Торжественное гашение конверта с маркой провели в Государственной Думе РФ. В церемонии участвовали Первый Заместитель Председателя Госдумы Ирина Яровая, Председатель Комитета Госдумы по обороне Владимир Касатонов, заместитель главнокомандующего Военно-Морским Флотом по военно-политической работе, контр-адмирал Владислав П…

❤35👍12🎉5

2 Nov 2026, 08:27 UTC≈3,940 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

💯16⚡9❤3🤩1

30 Oct 2026, 16:18 UTC≈5,340 views40 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📈 Финансовые показатели продолжают расти: по итогам 9 месяцев 2026 года нарастили выручку до 166 млрд руб, что на 5,2% больше, чем за аналогичный период прошлого года. Растёт востребованность коммерческих направлений деятельности: общая выручка от них увеличилась на 10%, выручка от грузоперевозок — на 54% год к году, а от услуг фулфилмента и других складских логистических услуг — на 90%. 💻 Цифровая трансформация ко…

❤19💯11⚡6😎3🐳1

29 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTC≈4,900 views56 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🌎225 лет новатору: Почта выпустила марку в честь изобретателя Бориса Якоби Памятное гашение прошло в Политехническом музее. 📮 29 октября в обращение вышла марка в честь учёного, одного из основоположников электротехники и изобретателя телеграфных аппаратов. На марке — портрет Якоби и созданный им телеграфный аппарат. Мы с особой радостью выпускаем эту марку не только как знак почтовой оплаты, но и как наш вклад в …

❤30⚡14🔥6🤩3💯2🐳1

28 Oct 2026, 07:30 UTC≈6,040 views68 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⏩В нужное время в нужном месте: новый формат поддержки — в отделениях Почты Совместно с партнёрами запустили пилотный проект по установке постаматов с гуманитарной помощью. 💙 Цель — поддержать многодетные и неполные семьи, ветеранов и других нуждающихся. Сейчас проект охватывает 10 000 подопечных общественных организаций Благополучатели могут сами выбрать локацию и время, чтобы забрать помощь. 📌Список почтовых о…

❤35👍24🤗4😍3🎃2

26 Oct 2026, 07:55 UTC≈5,370 views107 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📧 Доставили 126 млн электронных заказных писем с начала года 💻 Отправить такое письмо можно всего за две минуты — с компьютера или смартфона, без визита в отделение Почты. Если адресат не пользуется сервисом, распечатаем письмо и доставим его в обычном конверте. Онлайн-сервисом уже пользуются порядка 17 млн человек и организаций, включая суды и госслужбы 🌳 Электронный формат с начала года уже помог спасти 43 тысяч…

👍72❤16💯14🐳5

23 Oct 2026, 05:06 UTC≈6,420 views118 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💻 Почта теперь на Госуслугах Письма и посылки сами расскажут, где находятся! 📨 Почта России и Минцифры Татарстана запустили пилотный проект: пользователи будут получать уведомления о письмах и посылках прямо в личном кабинете Госуслуг. Уведомления будут сообщать о важных этапах и событиях: 🔵поступление письма в отделение; 🔵передача посылки курьеру; 🔵вручение отправления получателю; 🔵срок хранения отправления; 🔵ин…

👍65❤33🔥20

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @napochte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 08:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz495 voters

Рубрика «Знаете ли вы?» — вопрос №61 Сколько порой километров добираются письма от местного отделения до получателя? 💌

  1. Больше 20 км7%
  2. Больше 50 км12%
  3. Больше 10 км9%
  4. Больше 100 км71%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Вам почта!
@russianpochta · 43,379
19 posts
DonorSearch.org
@donorsearch · 10,658
4 posts
Дептранс Москвы
@DtRoad · 142,276
4 posts
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,622,185
4 posts
Мария Захарова
@mariavladimirovnazakharova · 458,003
3 posts
Копирайтер в Почту (не штат)
@pochtatest · 55
3 posts
Бойлерная
@boilerroomchannel · 225,045
2 posts
Еврейский музей и центр толерантности
@jewishmuseum · 13,940
2 posts
Минфин России
@minfin · 49,385
2 posts
Центр свт. Спиридона
@cspyridon · 285
1 post
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 331,028
1 post
E-commerce наше всё!
@ecomm1 · 992
1 post
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,022,997
1 post
Экспорт29 | Центр поддержки экспорта Архангельской области
@export29 · 223
1 post
Национальная анимационная Премия «Икар»
@ikaraward · 137
1 post
КСТАТИ
@kstati_p · 235,117
1 post
Химки ЛОБАНОВО
@lobanovo_khimki · 342
1 post
Марушкино и Кокошкино, район Внуково/Новости
@marikonews · 3,089
1 post
NN
@naebnet · 2,177,859
1 post
Товарищ Печкин
@pechkin_pochta · 231
1 post
Почта России: работа в офисе
@pochtajobs · 1,904
1 post
Инфлюенс-менеджер | Почта России
@pochtasmminfluence · 17
1 post
Pro отношения| бизнес| лагеря
@ugs077 · 200
1 post
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,662,248
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Почта России” (@napochte), 130,799 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/napochte.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.