Channel
@nant4t66
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,084subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003761202048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nant4t66 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 23 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nant4t66 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 1,084 | +14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 1,070 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 1,072 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (23 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,775 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
24 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
技师颜值：8 店铺环境：10 服务价格：9 服务评价：10 推荐程度：10 跟朋友一块来的，他2我3,看照片是小少妇的感觉，结果人一进门，居然出乎意料的好看，比照片多了一丝美艳，韵味更甚了；于是乎迫不及待地洗完澡，老师主动过来帮我擦全身，完全不需要我来动手，之后就是躺着开始服务。跟妹妹说了只出一次，所以妹妹先是给我按摩了一会，仿佛回到了当年混迹足疗店的日子，只不过现在的我是一丝不挂的。之后便是调情、指滑，不得不提一下胸滑，妹妹滑的很认真很舒服，特别是滑到大小腿的时候，柔软的触感深入骨髓，顶端的尖尖轻轻撩拨着我的心弦；然后是漫游，也是很仔细，这些服务倒不像是新人。之后换正面，先是跟我耳鬓厮磨一阵子，小少妇就是会调情，看着老师那张比照片魅惑数倍的脸，血脉喷张；一边让老师舔我咪咪，我一边摸着老师的小白兔，感受这片刻的愉悦，多的不谈了直接进入正题，开始臀推。不得不说，老师女上的姿势坐在我身上，真的是骚爆了，还拉着我的手去揉捏她的小白兔；…
技师颜值：8 店铺环境：9 服务价格：9 服务评价：10 推荐程度：10 服务太顶了，差点被秒了
🎟 抽奖标题: 派大星4t限时抽奖活动 中奖后七天内有效 各位请及时兑换 3字以上发言有效 满人开奖满50人 参与关键词: 抽奖 已参与: 0人 🎁 奖品列表： 优惠券100 X 3 优惠券50 X 5 参与要求: ➕加入 - 南通派大星全裸4T交流群 └ 💬 发言数大于 10 条
技师颜值；9 店铺环境10 服务价格699 服务评价10.技师小妹很热情，也很年轻，颜值在线，三点粉嫩，很有女友感 推荐程度9分 特别评价，店铺环境很好，可能是因为都比较年轻的原因，光线不像其他店那么昏暗，不过枕头可以考虑加号一点，不能斜躺着享受老师服务有点可惜
南通最权威的全裸4T派大星 营业啦 预约请提前联系 开发区分店也开了，有在开发区的兄弟可以来这边🫡 📱地址：恒隆国际D座 开发区碧桂园云谷 📱预约客服： @sxw9488 双向私聊：@pdx588_bot 交流群： @pdx4t888
❤1
技师颜值：邻家小妹 店铺环境：位置好找，安静 服务价格：450 服务评价：妹妹温柔，双指轻滑，鼻息清香，瞬间立正，课表服务一致。 推荐程度：强力推荐
技师颜值：9 店铺环境：9 服务价格：699 服务评价：9.5 推荐程度：9 下午闲来无事，看看群里推荐。本来想找个 98 老师玩玩的，结果看到这个店。抱着试一试的心态来看看。到地方上楼，看到环境不错。本来想多选一选妹妹的，结果第一个妹妹就让我很满意 o(^▽^)o 直接选了她，服务很到位。体验感很棒！全程不冷场，情绪价值拉满！标准 4T 服务，全程很热情主动！推荐！值得体验！下次带朋友一起来体验一下- ̗̀(๑ᵔ⌔ᵔ๑)
❤4
在岗 家人们，营业中🫡 📱地址：恒隆国际D座 📱QQ：3092537632 📱预约客服： @sxw9488 双向私聊：@pdx588_bot 交流群： @pdx4t888 相册频道：@nant4t66
❤4🦄1
【出击时间】7.20 【技师号码」3号 【出击留名】无风 联系客服 ： @sxw9488 【人照相似】8分 【颜值身材】9分 【服务态度】很好 【课室环境】很好，都是一次性用品 【综合评价】不错，环境很好，技师服务到位 【出击过程】下午有点空闲时间没事想着休闲一下，联系好客服到地方时间没对好等了一会，不过老师赶来的也算快。进来之后先背面很细致，老师皮肤很光滑，声音也很好听。之后a面服务也很认真，期间很主动拉着我的手摸腿摸屁股，奶子很挺乳头小小的摸着手感真不错，最后臀推出水很仔细的帮忙清理干净。
❤1
技师颜值：9 店铺环境：10 服务价格：9.5 服务评价：牛逼 苏苏臀推太爽了 推荐程度：10
❤1👍1
新到嫩妹🫡
❤2
技师颜值：9 店铺环境：9 技师价格：699 个人发挥：9 环境比较安全清净，妹妹颜值和身材都很不错，手法也非常好，情绪价值拉满，好评
❤2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @nant4t66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 673,968 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“南通派大星4T相册” (@nant4t66), 1,084 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nant4t66.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.