Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Настя пишет 📝

Channel

Настя пишет 📝

@nansy_nansy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,051subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001354127977
TypeChannel
Username@nansy_nansy
DescriptionСамый лучший эмо панк Канал создательницы магазина «NANSY’S SHOP» vk: https://vk.com/nansys_shop wb: https://www.wildberries.ru/seller/4562850 ozon: https://ozon.ru/t/LtXWog8 По вопросам сотрудничества: [email protected]
Created30 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nansy_nansy

Growth

9,0519,1029,076.56 August 2026 — 9,102 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,102 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,101 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,086 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,069 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,051 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,043–9,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:189,051-18
13 Aug 2026, 11:239,069-17
10 Aug 2026, 13:419,086-15
7 Aug 2026, 11:349,101-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:459,102no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:399,102first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 9,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,730
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held29 (29 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total73,690
Reactions total10,862
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,010
Videos
1,300
Links
512

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,862 reactions across 27 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52784424365850874735,98055.1%
custom 52784072479180320191,95418.0%
custom 52786032015059455891,74716.1%
custom 52806790966390575041,18110.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,862reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
103
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 27 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nansy_nansy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC≈1,460 views189 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Единороги на озоне! 🦄 — Стикеры с золотой фольгой «Фазы луны» — Наклейка на карту с сахарной ламинацией «Колесница»

custom 5278442436585087473110custom 527860320150594558943custom 528067909663905750431custom 52784072479180320195

16 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,890 views341 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Никогда бы не подумала, что чёлка за 250 рублей может изменить самовосприятие на 180 градусов! Как же я кайфую

custom 5278442436585087473204custom 527840724791803201970custom 527860320150594558956custom 528067909663905750411

16 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,970 views371 reactionsread 18 August 2026

А что, если сделать подарочные фигурные открытки в виде сердца «Кондракара» со случайными предсказаниями, которые будут спрятаны под стираемую наклейку — чтобы их прочитать, вам придётся стереть защитный слой монеткой 🪑???

custom 5278442436585087473219custom 527860320150594558986custom 528067909663905750451custom 527840724791803201915

15 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,090 views213 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Денёчка! Наши товары теперь можно найти в: — Тюмени (магазин «Твоя полка») — Перми (магазин «Та полка») — Питере (магазин «Твоя полка», Владимирский проспект) — Новосибирске (магазин «Лисья полка») — Иркутске (магазин «Твоя полка») Также новинки с единорогами доехали до «Своей полки» в Москве! 🥰

custom 5278603201505945589124custom 527844243658508747354custom 527840724791803201930custom 52806790966390575045

14 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈2,170 views345 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Ой ну прям «ДАВНЫМ-ДАВНО»

custom 5278442436585087473209custom 527860320150594558970custom 527840724791803201956custom 528067909663905750410

14 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC≈2,330 views408 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Человек — это животное, которое сошло с ума. Из этого безумия есть два выхода: ему необходимо снова стать животным; или же стать большим, чем человек

custom 5278442436585087473248custom 527840724791803201987custom 527860320150594558960custom 528067909663905750413

13 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC≈2,430 views357 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Любимый Белгород с непростой судьбой

custom 5278442436585087473225custom 527840724791803201971custom 527860320150594558952custom 52806790966390575049

13 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,630 views619 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Отзыв на наклейку на карту АХХАХАХАХА

custom 5278442436585087473400custom 5280679096639057504109custom 527840724791803201990custom 527860320150594558920

13 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈2,650 views478 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

✂️✂️✂️

custom 5278442436585087473318custom 527860320150594558991custom 527840724791803201961custom 52806790966390575048

11 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈2,970 views552 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Нашла в тумбочке рисунок университетских времён 🥹

custom 5278442436585087473347custom 5280679096639057504113custom 527860320150594558976custom 527840724791803201916

11 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,650 views378 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Что я вижу, когда человек проявляет всевозможную заботу в мой адрес: дарит дорогие подарки, усердно восторгается, старается всячески угодить Лавбомбинг в одной картинке

custom 5278442436585087473222custom 527840724791803201988custom 527860320150594558957custom 528067909663905750411

10 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC≈2,730 views246 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Впрочем, ничего удивительного

custom 5278442436585087473147custom 527840724791803201955custom 527860320150594558940custom 52806790966390575044

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @nansy_nansy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 183,239 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Настя пишет 📝” (@nansy_nansy), 9,051 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nansy_nansy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.